This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“Supreme Court Returns to a Culture War Battleground: Transgender Rights; On Wednesday, the justices will hear the marquee case of the term, a challenge to a Tennessee law banning several forms of medical care for transgender youths.” ” Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. Casey Parks and Ann E.
Years of convictions could be at risk following a Washington Supreme Courtdecision that struck down the state’s felony drug possession law. The state supreme…
Between 2011 and 2014, Thompson took out three loans, totaling $219,000, from Washington Federal Bank for Savings, a small bank on the South Side where the Daley family made its name. But they were not false, he insisted, because he indicated only that he had borrowed $110,000 from Washington Federal not that he owed $110,000.
“Regardless of how noble corporations may be with their DEI goals, the legality of this is now under the microscope,” Leon Prieto, professor of management at Clayton State University, told The Washington Post. The post Supreme CourtDecision Complicates Diversity Disclosure Landscape appeared first on Intelligize.
Here’s the Thursday morning read: In an Attempt to Reverse Supreme Court’s Immunity Decision, Schumer Introduces No Kings Act (Mary Clare Jalonick, The Associated Press) Ex-justice department officials raise alarm over US supreme court’s immunity ruling (Peter Stone, The Guardian) Kagan’s High Court Ethics Proposal Poses Enforcement Challenges (Lydia (..)
“Supreme Court’s conservative majority to decide direction of law on race, elections and religious freedom this month”: Ariane de Vogue of CNN has this report. And today’s broadcast of C-SPAN’s Washington Journal contained a segment titled “ Amy Howe on Key Supreme CourtDecisions in June 2023.”
Jeremy Roebuck and Shayna Jacobs of The Washington Post report that “ Judge refuses for now to drop Adams charges, appoints outside lawyer; Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general, will examine the Justice Departments decision to dismiss the bribery case against the New York mayor.”
Here’s the Friday morning read: What the Supreme CourtDecision Means for NY’s Eviction Moratorium (David Brand, City Limits). Supreme Court won’t block Indiana University vaccine mandate as Justice Barrett rejects student plea (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post). Making Sense of Chrysafis v.
Here’s the Monday morning read: Antiabortion activists at Supreme Court cite an unlikely authority for overturning Roe v. Wade: Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post). Oklahoma attorney general urges Supreme Court to overturn McGirt (Chris Casteel, The Oklahoman).
Every year, about this time, I dust off the crystal ball to offer a look at the year ahead to see what Washington has in store for broadcasters. And there is never a shortage of ideas from Washington as to how broadcasters should act. Comments in this proceeding are due on January 24th, 2011. Radio Issues.
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court denies request to reinstate Florida drag show law (David Kihara, Politico) ‘He didn’t deserve to die like this’: Supreme Courtdecision leaves family of a man killed at the border searching for justice (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) She got a ticket for beeping her car horn.
“Ban on Non-Unanimous Verdicts Is Not Retroactive, Supreme Court Rules; The 6-to-3 decision, a sequel to a ruling last year, affects thousands of prisoners in Louisiana and Oregon”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. Supreme Court refuses to make Louisiana ban on non-unanimous juries retroactive.”
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “ Supreme Court sides with government over environmentalists in Barrett’s first signed majority opinion.” ” John Fritze of USA Today reports that “ Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivers first opinion in case involving records disclosure.”
In a recent state courtdecision, a King County judge in Washington State concluded that Facebook violated state political disclosure rules by not publicly providing information about the sale of political ads relating to state elections and ballot issues, as required by state law.
A dispute over a railing collapse that injured fans at the Washington Commanders' stadium could still end up in arbitration after a Fourth Circuit panel reversed a lower-courtdecision blocking the team from enforcing the arbitration clause on the fans' game tickets.
The Supreme CourtDecision in Citizens United v. What has not been addressed are the potential legal issues that this "third party" money may pose for broadcasters during the course of political campaigns.
Supreme Court will not take up Johnson & Johnson challenge of $2.1 billion cancer case award (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post). No ‘Magic Words’ Needed as Asylum-Seekers Lose at High Court (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law).
Aereo finally lost a courtdecision. This is the first case that Aereo itself has lost, also winning a favorable decision from a District Court in Boston which essentially followed the Second Circuits reasoning (see our summary of the Boston decision here ).
Gugliuzza, Temple University Beasley School of Law; Jonas Anderson, American University Washington College of Law; and Jason Rantanen, University of Iowa College of Law. This is the second in a new series on venue transfer requests and mandamus at the Federal Circuit. Litigants shouldn’t get to choose the judge who decides their case.
Every year, about this time, I dust off the crystal ball to offer a look at the year ahead to see what Washington has in store for broadcasters. This year, like many in the recent past, Washington will consider important issues for both radio and TV, as well as issues affecting the growing on-line presence of broadcasters.
It is the beginning of another year – and a time to look ahead to look ahead at what broadcasters should expect from Washington in the coming year. So there is always something happening in Washington for which broadcasters need to be alert. And there are many issues in Congress or at other agencies that could affect broadcasters.
Sometimes policy decisions will come from individual cases, and sometimes they will be driven by a particular FCC Commissioner who finds a specific issue that is of specific interest to him or her. But here is our try at listing at least some of the issues that broadcasters should expect from Washington in the coming year.
And, Congress has so since the beginning, with George Washington signing the the First Patent Act into law in 1790. As Congress continued to legislatively develop the statute, courts also added common law nuance, including the law of patent eligibility. by Dennis Crouch The U.S. Prometheus , 566 U.S. 66 (2012); Alice Corp.
Texas , which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v.
The short provision has remained essentially unchanged since it was originally handwritten in the 1700s and signed into law by President George Washington. ” Unfortunately, due to a series of Supreme Courtdecisions, patent eligibility law in the United States has become confused, constricted, and unclear in recent years.
Indecency: After the Supreme Courtdecision in June 2012, upholding the FCC’s right to regulate indecency but questioning the current procedure for doing so, the FCC’s regulation of indecency has been up in the air.
In a Courtdecision in 2008, the US Court of Appeals determined that the FCC had not adequately assessed its obligations under NEPA with respect to the impact of communications towers on birds after there were claims that towers killed millions of birds each year. After the Courtdecision, American Bird Conservancy v.
Although the district court agreed to confirm the award, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit disagreed, concluding that confirmation was inappropriate because Antrix lacked adequate contacts with the Western District of Washington, where Devas brought its suit.
The American Civil Liberties Union has challenged the constitutionality of the Florida law, making some of the same arguments that caused several state supreme courts to strike down broad bans on land ownership by foreign citizens of Asian countries decades ago, including a pivotal California Supreme Courtdecision in 1952.”
In an interview with the Blog , FDLI wants to recognize the efforts of Chris Perkins, Gabe Lindman and Emma Dardis of Washington, DC-based marketing agency Model B, for their amazing work. 2024 brings a host of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Plus, the burgundy was kicked up a notch to a cherry red.
Pre-1972 sound recordings are also still an issue, with state appeals courts looking at US District Courtdecisions in New York and Florida, trying to decide if a performance right exists in these recordings in these two states (we wrote about the NY appeal here , and the initial Florida decision here ).
The Super Bowl incident, as well as various other instances of “fleeting expletives” that slipped out during TV awards shows, led to numerous FCC fines in the early 2000s, and a long string of court appeals thereafter.
In 2021, the District Court ruled that the Berkeley ordinance was not preempted by EPCA , rejecting the notion that EPCA preempts local ordinances that do “not facially address any of those [energy conservation or energy use] standards.” Under EPCA, the U.S. Berkeley has not yet said whether it will appeal the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
Gonzalez — The annual Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference put on by the Food and Drug Law Institute (“FDLI”) took place in Washington this week. FTC Supreme Courtdecision stripping FTC of its ability to obtain restitution or disgorgement under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. By Steven J.
Several of them are sequels to earlier high courtdecisions. First Amendment The current court is very solicitous of First Amendment rights. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v.
Supreme Court’sDecision Th Supreme Court vacated and remanded by a vote of 9-0. Justice Elena Kagan wrote on behalf of the unanimous Court. The Court’sdecision relied heavily on its prior ruling in Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S.
. § 1331 ; and (2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1983 in state court.” Williams v.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. She is a former experienced judge in civil and commercial trials at the Shanghai Pudong New District People’s Court in China. 9-10:30am London/10-11.30am the Hague/4-5.30pm Beijing) RSVP now your free ticket here.
This is evidenced by the US Supreme Court 2022 judgment Golan v. She is a former experienced judge in civil and commercial trials at the Shanghai Pudong New District People’s Court in China.
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in Empire Health Foundation v. Empire Health Foundation, which operates in eastern Washington state, first claims that HHS’s approach in the 2005 regulation systematically — and intentionally — reduces DSH payments to needy hospitals. In 2020, the U.S. Empire Health’s arguments.
Some older Supreme Courtdecisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”.
What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower court ruling upheld by the Supreme Court. ” Obviously, this decision would not impact D.C. statehood.
In reaching its decision, the Courtrecognized a consent-based theory of personal jurisdiction, which it found does not conflict with the contacts-based test set forth in International Shoe Co. Washington , 326 U.S. According to the Court, those decisions did not overrule the precedent established in Pennsylvania Fire Ins.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
100 
Let's personalize your content