At the Lectern
APRIL 15, 2024
.” The essay might not be giving the California Supreme Court enough credit when it says the court generally doesn’t interpret the State Constitution independently. A pair of 2019 decisions are good examples of the court ruling without regard to what the U.S. Supreme Court has said or might say.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 5, 2021
What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower court ruling upheld by the Supreme Court. I have written about D.C. It is a recurring problem.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
So Congress, for the first time, passed a law authorizing the chief justice to hire an administrative assistant. From 1972 to 1985, Cannon served as Burger’s assistant, helping him implement various changes to modernize the court. In June, the court ruled in R.G. & Harris Funder Homes v. EEOC that it does.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2021
The court, which did not address the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding alleged inadequacies in the climate change-related analyses, found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that they would suffer irreparable harm. Ministry of Economic Affairs (Taipei Administrative Court).
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” Richardson v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
45 
Let's personalize your content