LawSites
DECEMBER 4, 2023
We knew that a systemized approach to addressing value-based considerations would be far more effective at consistently capturing the full value of the legal work being scoped and we delivered on that need with our innovative solution: Modifiers. Demo video: [link] Founded: 2/1/2018, Washington DC. Anything else?
LawSites
JANUARY 17, 2022
We need your vote! Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Headquarters: Washington, D.C. Link not currently working as web site undergoing redesign.). Founded: 4/1/2021. Headquarters: Ona, W.V.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LawSites
JANUARY 17, 2022
We need your vote! Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Here is your chance to help pick the legal technology startups that will be selected for the sixth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2022.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 5, 2021
What is most striking however is the coverage in the Washington Post, which reported on the summary affirmance but only quoted supporters for the challenge, including a strikingly misleading take on the lower court ruling upheld by the Supreme Court. residents a vote in Congress without statehood. statehood.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
So Congress, for the first time, passed a law authorizing the chief justice to hire an administrative assistant. From 1972 to 1985, Cannon served as Burger’s assistant, helping him implement various changes to modernize the court. He also taught criminal law and trial practice at the George Washington University School of Law.
The Crime Report
JULY 16, 2021
Capitol, attorneys who promoted former President Donald Trump’s false claims about election fraud are being forced to defend their actions in court, reports the Washington Post. Six months after the violent attack on the U.S.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
FEBRUARY 10, 2020
The dissent contended that “a federal court need not manage all of the delicate foreign relations and regulatory minutiae implicated by climate change to offer real relief, and the mere fact that this suit cannot alone halt climate change does not mean that it presents no claim suitable for judicial resolution.” Trump , No.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
135 
Let's personalize your content