This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Pennsylvania Supreme Courtruled Monday that mail-in ballots with missing or incorrect dates will not be counted in the 2024 general election. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that mail-in ballots must contain a date, emphasizing the need to follow instructions in the interest of ensuring fairness in the electoral process.
Among other bodies that have hailed the ruling is Human Rights Watch , which has termed it a “major step to protect the right to a fair trial in Uganda” The post Uganda President defies supreme courtruling declaring military trials of civilians unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News.
The Council of Europe’s Venice Commission has published an urgent report on the conditions and legal standards whereby constitutional courts can invalidate elections following a Romanian Constitutional Courtruling. The Venice Commission stated, “As a rule, the voters must trust that their vote is final.
Subsequently, Doynov alleged that the Supreme Administrative Court had violated his rights to legal counsel, freedom, freedom of expression, right to courts and to a fair trial in the process of examining his claim under the EU Charter. Doynov was first detained under suspicion of authoring a fake bomb threat.
It noted that the disciplinary decision failed to clarify how Ekmez’s victory sign constituted a symbol associated with criminal organizations and found that the lower courts had not thoroughly examined this aspect.
is a no-fault state, state’s highest courtrules”: John R. The state’s Supreme Judicial Courtruled that if wedding plans crumble, the engagement ring must be returned to the person who purchased it.” ” You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts at this link.
The US Supreme Courtruled on Friday that a unanimous jury is required to apply a recidivism punishment under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. The court held that a jury must unanimously find that the qualifying convictions were from separate occurrences for the mandatory minimum to apply.
While the court acknowledged the Greek government’s contention that insufficient evidence linked Greek officials directly to the alleged actions, it emphasized the state’s obligation to thoroughly investigate allegations of human rights violations.
A UK High Courtruled Monday that a ban on puberty blockers issued in May 2024 in the UK was lawful. ” TransActual’s Director for Healthcare, Chay Brown, stated his concerns following the High Courtruling: We are seriously concerned about the safety and welfare of young trans people in the UK.
The court upheld a lower court’s ruling in R. In Daviault , the courtruled that a man who raped an elderly woman could use intoxication as a defense because he was in a “state akin to automatism.” ” On Friday, the court held that section 33.1 Parliament passed section 33.1
In 2018, the European Court of Justice was similarly tasked with considering whether IP addresses constitute personal data in Benedik v Slovenia. The courtruled that the legal provision used by the police to obtain the subscriber information associated with the dynamic IP address is subject to the Convention’s scrutiny.
Other opponents of the bill voiced concerns with its goal of bypassing a Supreme Courtruling that declared the government’s Rwanda plan unlawful. Stephen Kinnock, the Labour Party’s Shadow Minister for Immigration, called the bill “an assault on the rule of law and an affront to the separation of powers.”
The UK High Courtruled Friday that the Government’s climate strategy is inadequate and therefore violates the UK Climate Change Act 2008. The ruling comes nearly two years after a previous High Court judgment ordered the Government to strengthen its net zero strategy to bring it in line with the Climate Change Act.
The post Federal courtrules Artificial Intelligence cannot be an ‘inventor’ under US patent law appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
The Irish High Courtruled Friday that a decision made by the country’s Minister for Justice in 2020 to declare the UK a “safe country” to send asylum seekers back to during processing was “unlawful as a matter of EU law.” The UK has yet to respond to the ruling.
In response, Mustafa argued the trial court had committed errors of appreciation and delivered an unreasoned judgment, launching failed complaints before the Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court before being successful before the ECHR.
The post Australia High Courtrules against electric vehicle tax appeared first on JURIST - News. Victorian Greens Upper House Member for Parliament, Katherine Copsey referred to the decision as “a win for climate and green transport.”
Decisions of the Administrative court are final and cannot be appealed, making the ISIE’s refusal to include the three candidates a significant departure from constitutional practice. The post Tunisia electoral commission rejects courtruling reinstating 3 presidential candidates appeared first on JURIST - News.
The post US Supreme Courtrules Puerto Ricans can be excluded from federal benefits program appeared first on JURIST - News. Justice Sotomayor in her dissent argued that “[t]here is no rational basis for Congress to treat needy citizens living anywhere in the United States so differently from others.”.
The case has been remanded back to the district court for further proceedings. The post US federal appeals courtrules seizure of 700 safety deposit boxes unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News.
The majority only overturned the Alberta Court of Appeal decision partially and upheld the constitutionality of the part of the IAA that only deals with projects carried out or financed by federal authorities on federal lands or outside Canada.
The US Supreme Court Tuesday released a unanimous opinion holding that certain abandoned financial instruments that are similar to money orders may be recovered by the state in which they were purchased. The post US Supreme Courtrules against Delaware in $400M interstate unclaimed property dispute appeared first on JURIST - News.
Upon de novo review, however, the Ninth Circuit found that the district court erred in its ruling and remanded the case back to the district court for further proceedings. The post US appeals courtrules in favor of Native American tribe’s hunting rights on ceded lands appeared first on JURIST - News.
The municipality has filed an appeal with the Provincial Court. While the appeal is being decided, the municipality must comply with the existing ruling. The post Ecuador courtrules that river in capital has rights appeared first on JURIST - News.
The Hong Kong High Courtruled against Jimmy Lai in his challenge against the court’s jurisdiction to hear the charge of conspiracy to sedition on Friday. The post Hong Kong courtrules activist Jimmy Lai’s conspiracy charge within time limit appeared first on JURIST - News.
The UK Supreme Court held Thursday that Surrey’s planning authorities acted unlawfully when granting planning permission for an oil well development in 2019. The courtruled that the authorities should have considered certain environmental impacts when making the decision.
Germany’s Federal Constitutional Courtruled Tuesday that multiple provisions of the country’s Federal Criminal Police Office Act (BKA Act) are unconstitutional because they infringe upon citizens’ privacy rights. Furthermore, the courtruled section 45(1) first sentence no. 2 and 18(2) no.
As such, I am not persuaded that this concession, at the eleventh hour of this litigation and in the context of the Crown’s vigorous opposition to any relief in these proceedings, should now prevent this Court from issuing a declaration.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Tuesday that a Minnesota law requiring handgun carry permit applicants to be at least 21 years of age is unconstitutional. In light of the Eighth Circuit’s ruling, the state may petition for a full-court rehearing or appeal to the US Supreme Court.
In May, the court ordered the map be used for the 2024 election, supplanting a February district courtruling that would have required state officials to redraw it once again six months out from November 5. The previous Louisiana congressional map was struck down on similar grounds.
In a unanimous slip opinion, the US Supreme Courtruled on Thursday that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) waives sovereign immunity and that the federal government can be liable for incorrect debt reporting that damages credit scores. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the opinion of the court.
In a slip opinion on Friday, the US Supreme Court declared that a federal sentencing law gives district courts discretion to impose either concurrent or consecutive sentences for certain drug-related crimes. The case is an appeal from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Courtruled that 18 U.S.C. §
The court addressed concerns from victim’s families by stating that their desire for justice was not an appropriate reason for the legislature to broaden statutory framework in order to obtain “substantively more correct justice.”
The post New York courtrules state ethics commission unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News. Republican State Senate Leader Dean Skelos and Democratic Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver also both resigned in 2015 amid public corruption charges, for which they were eventually convicted.
In a statement the president of the judicial body, Francisco Morales Saravia, commented that “the rulings of the Constitutional Court must be followed and complied with, just like resolutions of the Supreme Court” referring to earlier actions by the Peruvian Supreme Court in the case.
“Supreme Court drops review of Meta, shareholder brawl over data breach disclosures; Only weeks after hearing oral arguments, the high court let a lower courtruling favoring shareholders stand”: Kelsey Reichmann of Courthouse News Service has this report.
In a 2-1 decision, the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district courtruling that the US Attorney General must be a plaintiff in a suit brought to enforce the VRA. ” Though the court could not determine whether Section 2 creates an individual right, it found that the statute does not contain a private enforcement mechanism.
Following this ruling, Gonzales can pursue her claim of retaliation against the county. The post US Supreme Courtrules First Amendment retaliatory arrest claims permissible despite probable cause appeared first on JURIST - News.
“Cheyenne Mountain Zoos elephants are not ‘legal persons’ under the law, Colorado Supreme Courtrules; The Colorado Supreme Court upheld El Paso County District Courts June ruling on Tuesday”: Lauren Penington and Katie Langford of The Denver Post have this report.
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not need to provide notice to delinquent taxpayers of summons made against them to collect outstanding federal taxes. This does not apply to summons to determine whether a taxpayer owes an outstanding amount, only summons to collect. The case, Polselli v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content