Court Rules Criminal Law District of Columbia 
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 2, 2024
After the riot, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine was widely praised when he announced that he was considering arresting Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that criminal threats must be based on a showing of a culpable mental state. We have been here before with Trump.
SCOTUSBlog
DECEMBER 31, 2020
In June, the court ruled in R.G. & Before becoming clerk of the Supreme Court, Stevas was the clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and worked as an assistant U.S. He also taught criminal law and trial practice at the George Washington University School of Law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 26, 2022
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. Circuit to the Supreme Court, where she clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens during the 2003-04 term. The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, unanimously rejected that position and held that the ministerial exception applied.
SCOTUSBlog
AUGUST 27, 2024
Share Just under two months after a divided Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution for their conduct in office, Special Counsel Jack Smith charged former President Donald Trump in a revised indictment alleging that Trump conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 18, 2024
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court , asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to rule on Trump’s appeal. The justices denied that request on Dec.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 7, 2024
As it has in the past, the Court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Sawyer , in which the court ruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills. Moreover, shortly after McCardle , the Court ruled in United States v.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 25, 2022
Indeed, such a use of the speech would contradict controlling Supreme Court precedent. Again, the use of such a law would fail for the reasons above. The Criminal Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. That does not change due to Trump’s speech before the riot. In Brandenburg v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
85 
Let's personalize your content