Remove Court Rules Remove Criminal Law Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Michigan Supreme Court rules Flint water crisis charges are invalid without preliminary examination

JURIST

Baird and Nicolas Lyon, were charged for their roles in the Flint water crisis under Michigan’s “one-man grand jury statute.” ” The law allows a single judge to consider evidence in private chambers and issue an indictment authorizing criminal charges. The cases were remanded to the state district court.

article thumbnail

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Sidewalks are Not “Pedestrian Ways” to Allow for Eminent Domain Seizures

JonathanTurley

However, Wisconsin has strong protections for home owners, including statutes expressly stating that the power of eminent domain must be “ strictly construed ” against the government. Moreover, there is a statute that expressly bars the use of eminent domain to take property to for “pedestrian way[s].”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?

JonathanTurley

However, the most damaging moment came outside of the presence of the jury when the judge drilled down on the law. He told the prosecutors “I have been wrestling with this statute with, I’d hate to count the hours I’ve put into it, I’m still trying to figure out what it says, what’s prohibited. I have a legal education.”

Statute 59
article thumbnail

Subjective intent of wrongdoing required to convict doctors under Controlled Substances Act

SCOTUSBlog

The opinion is a victory for physicians prescribing innovative treatments that they believe serve legitimate medical purposes, and it should assuage concerns about a ruling that could have chilled more doctors from prescribing needed pain treatments. The case, Ruan v.

article thumbnail

The Supreme Court’s Decision in ZF Automotive et al. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: A U.S. Perspective

Conflict of Laws

The Court ruled that since neither panel was conferred governmental authority, § 1782 discovery would be inappropriate in both instances. Justice Barrett, writing for a unanimous Court, adopted a textual approach to the question.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Argument in double-jeopardy case shines spotlight on prosecutorial issues faced by Native tribes

SCOTUSBlog

Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Kimberly if there was an “easy fix” for the tribe and the federal government to avoid double jeopardy problems in future cases in the event that the Supreme Court rules in favor of Denezpi. Kimberly responded that there are two easy fixes, both of which, he asserted, respect tribal sovereignty.

article thumbnail

Fourth Circuit Overturns Conviction Of Retired Air Force Colonel For Using Racial Slur

JonathanTurley

.” The language of the statute in my view is unconstitutional due to its sweeping criminalization of any “curse or abuse” that could “provoke a breach of the peace.” ” However, the appellate panel corrected noted that such laws are narrowly construed in light of controlling precedent.

Statute 40