Remove Court Rules Remove Depose Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Kansas Supreme Court reaffirms abortion rights and strikes down state restrictions

JURIST

While the state argued that banning D&E promoted the value and dignity of human life, the court found that this interest was too broadly stated and not supported by evidence showing that the law was necessary or effective in achieving this goal. The court noted that S.B. The court noted that S.B. Physicians Herbert C.

Court 197
article thumbnail

Exclusion of HCLA expert based on locality rule affirmed.

Day on Torts

After deposing Dr. Steege, defendants moved to exclude Dr. Steege on the basis that he was not competent to testify under Tenn. The trial court ruled that “Dr. Steege did not meet the locality rule outlined in Shipley v. In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Tort 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Texas and Louisiana lack right to challenge Biden immigration policy, court rules

SCOTUSBlog

Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy. District Judge Drew Tipton agreed that the policy violates federal law and vacated it nationwide. Moreover, Kavanaugh noted, the Constitution gives the executive branch broad discretion to enforce the laws.

article thumbnail

Second Circuit Refutes Allegations Involving Law Clerk in Mediaite, Above the Law, and Other Publications

JonathanTurley

On October 5, 2021, the site Above the Law ran a story by Senior editor Kathryn Rubino about what she described as a vehemently racist law student who was given a prestigious clerkship by William H. chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. This cannot be the end of this matter.”.

Laws 32
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. The court determined, moreover, that even if the plaintiffs’ claims could be construed as post-effective date claims (i.e., and non-U.S.

Court 40