This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court denied a request on Friday to place a hold on a lower court’s decision to uphold two EPA rules while the decisions are under appeal, meaning that the EPA rules must be followed until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit makes a ruling.
As a practical matter, he asked Suri, why is it inconvenient for the government to litigate in one circuit instead of another? RJR Vapor is incorporated and located in North Carolina, where challenges to the FDAs denials of applications to sell e-cigarettes had been unsuccessful.
In 2008, the Supreme Court recognized the right to bear arms as an individual right in District of Columbia v. City of Chicago , the courtruled that this right applied against the states. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v. This case concerned concealed-carry restrictions under N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)
Cruz went to federal court in 2019, asking the court to block enforcement of Section 304 on the ground that it violates the First Amendment. DistrictCourt for the District of Columbia agreed. A three-judge panel of the U.S.
In an earlier blogpost we reported that the Amsterdam DistrictCourtruled that it had international jurisdiction under the Brussels I-bis Regulation and the GDPR. The settlement addressed issues very similar to those raised in this case, as explicitly outlined in the agreement.
The case promises to be a showdown between the Supreme Court and lower courts, which have been chipping away at the high court’s prior Second Amendment rulings. In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. Two years after Heller, in McDonald v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Federal Court Found Flaws in New Climate Change Analysis for Wyoming Oil and Gas Leases. and non-U.S. FEATURED CASE.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The lawsuit was filed in the federal districtcourt for the District of Columbia.
That provision, Section 324 of the act, also stripped federal courts of the power to review challenges to those permits and channeled all challenges to the constitutionality of the act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
An Oregon-based timber company went to federal court in Oregon to challenge the monument’s expansion. Meanwhile, a trade association representing the Pacific Northwest timber industry went to federal court in the District of Columbia with a similar challenge. But the D.C. On appeal, the U.S. United States and Murphy Co.
Oklahoma , the Supreme Courtruled that the eastern half of Oklahoma remains “Indian country” for purposes of the Major Crimes Act , meaning that the federal government, not the state, has authority for prosecuting Native Americans for major crimes committed on reservations. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld the CADA.
New York has long been the source of major litigation over gun control. That includes the possible loss before the Supreme Court in a pending major gun rights case. ” The New York law could offer an important test of the outer boundaries of this right after the Courtrules in the pending case.
To date, federal courts have been reluctant to grant this type of extraordinary relief in challenges to offshore wind projects. For example, in recent years, federal courts have denied motions for preliminary injunction in litigation pertaining to the South Fork Wind , Vineyard Wind , and Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind projects.
Montana Department of Revenue , the Supreme Courtruled that although states are not required to subsidize private education, states that choose to do so cannot exclude religious schools from receiving funding simply because they are religious. A new case on public funding and religious education. Last year, in Espinoza v.
The federal government also is subject to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which prohibits the government and other covered entities like the District of Columbia from “substantially burden[ing]” a person’s exercise of religion. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct.
The districtcourt and U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., In McCarthy v. In Skinner v.
They have pushed ill-considered legislation and litigation that only served to create precedent against gun control. Courts likely would press the Biden administration on why it is seeking to ban this model when other higher-caliber weapons are sold. In the past, politicians in cities like New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C.,
The US Supreme Courtruled Friday that abortion pill mifepristone will continue to be widely accessible as the ongoing appeals process takes place. The Supreme Courtruling keeps mifepristone widely available during ongoing litigation. Mifepristone, approved in 2000, is used broadly to end pregnancies.
They have pushed ill-considered legislation and litigation that only served to create precedent against gun control. Moreover, the earlier ban was imposed in 1994 — before the Supreme Courtruled in District of Columbia v. In the past, politicians in cities like New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C.,
In court papers, she was identified only as “L.C.”. Four years later, her case reached the Supreme Court. In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the courtruled in Olmstead v. Glucksberg , a case in which he helped persuade the court to unanimously uphold Washington’s ban on physician-assisted suicide.
Share The first Black woman to clerk on the Supreme Court. Two trailblazing civil-rights litigators. As we did last year , SCOTUSblog looks back and remembers some of the people who died this year and whose lives and work brought them to the highest court in the nation. Huron’s impact extended beyond his work as a litigator.
Paul Clement, the conservative Supreme Court advocate who frequently sparred with Ginsburg during oral arguments, called her “ a path-marking litigator for equality for women and a keen legal tactician.”. Ruth Ginsburg was one of the members of the Court who achieved greatness before she became a great justice,” he wrote.
Raskin declared “we’re winning in court…we’re winning across the board.” ” The boast was dubious at best on Sunday given earlier losses, but became embarrassing on Monday and Tuesday as additional courtsruled in favor of the Trump Administration in major cases.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. On October 4 , the federal districtcourt for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Given this “unmitigable prejudice,” the court concluded “that this litigation cannot, in good conscience, continue in the Tribe’s absence.”
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. On the other hand, challenges to the EPA’s approval or issuance of any implementation plan, as well as any other final action by the EPA that is “locally or regionally applicable,” can only be filed in the local or regional court of appeals. Town of Southold, N.Y. ,
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. Circuit to the Supreme Court, where she clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens during the 2003-04 term. A stint in the Obama administration, including arguments at the Supreme Court. before going to clerk for Judge David Tatel of the U.S.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In addition, the court found that the writer failed to allege elements of an abuse of process or a malicious prosecution claim.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The court directed the parties to submit a proposed format for briefing within 30 days. and non-U.S.
If Sullivan’s ruling remains in effect, they argued, it will effectively nullify Summerhays’ ruling. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected the states’ request to join the case on appeal. The court explained that the states’ request came too late. case to defend the policy.
The full collection — which includes contributions from 14 scholars — is available here. ‘Self-Inflicted Second Amendment Wounds’ The 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. In his essay, titled “Will the Supreme Court Avoid Further Self-Inflicted Second Amendment Wounds?”,
Waters’ most recent words could well be cited in the ongoing litigation over the January 6 th riot on Capitol Hill. District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine then thrilled many by declaring that he was investigating Trump for a possible incitement charge.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation , No. and non-U.S. 17cv1215, 17cv1873, 17cv1911 (S.D.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Colorado CourtRuled on Venue for Colorado Local Governments’ Climate Change Claims. Wikimedia Commons. and non-U.S.
In 2011, the courtruled 8-1 in favor of Westboro Baptist Church, an infamous group of zealots who engaged in homophobic protests at the funerals of slain American troops. On the existing evidence, they will likely fail on appeal, even if they survive the trial level litigation. In Brandenburg v.
The state court, Sotomayor observed, never addressed Love’s contention that he had been deprived of his constitutional right to an impartial jury. Although that was done in Love’s case, she noted, it doesn’t help “if courts do not even consider claims of racial bias that litigants bring forward.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Federal Court Upheld Environmental Review for Forest Thinning Project. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S.
(The Sabin Center and the Environmental Defense Fund created the IRA Tracker after the IRA was enacted in 2022 to record actions taken by federal agencies to implement the law and relaunched the resource at the start of President Trumps second term with added features to track rollbacks and litigation). In State of New York v.
Without the court’s intervention, the House Committee on Ways and Means is poised to obtain six years of tax returns for Trump and the companies he owns. McFadden, a Trump appointee, ruled against Trump, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that ruling.
If some cases can be sustained past motions to dismiss, they would also allow for discovery though those fights could draw out the litigation. However, Democrats may also be laying the foundation for Trump to claim vindication in defeating such cases in courts. 6 riot that he was investigating Trump for a possible incitement charge.
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to lift those orders while they appealed. The court of appeals refused, instead expediting argument. By a split vote, the 6th Circuit then reversed the lower courts’ rulings , concluding that the states were likely to win their appeals. The court thus allowed the laws go into effect.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed. In an opinion by Judge Patricia Millett, the majority compared the members’ right to go to court to challenge the denial of information under Section 2954 to standing to sue for the denial of requests under laws like the Freedom of Information Act.
As it has in the past, the Court adopted a three-tiered approach to presidential powers based on the source of a presidential action. Sawyer , in which the courtruled against President Harry Truman’s takeover of steel mills. Moreover, shortly after McCardle , the Courtruled in United States v.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Sunset in Hawaii. and non-U.S. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content