Court Rules Divorce Tort 
Day on Torts
AUGUST 9, 2021
When defendant and his wife were later divorcing in 2019, the annuity came to light, and the wife informed plaintiff that she had seen a check that appeared to have been endorsed by someone else on her behalf. Based on the evidence, the Court affirmed the ruling that plaintiff “possessed a one-half ownership interest in the annuity funds.”.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 2, 2022
With the reduction of $2 million to Heard, that still leaves $8,350,000 — more than the $7 million that he gave up in the divorce. Attorneys are protected by absolute privilege in court in making harmful and even false statements. Of course, these awards will be subject to motions for reduction or remittitur.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Day on Torts
MARCH 12, 2021
4, 2021), plaintiff filed a fraud claim against defendant attorney who had represented him for a portion of plaintiff’s previous divorce case. After an initial appeal and remand, the trial court held a bench trial where plaintiff and defendant were the only witnesses. M2019-01395-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 19, 2021
Eichel: Choice of Court Agreements and Rules of Interpretation in the Context of Tort or Anti-trust Claims. In its rulings CDC (C-352/13) and Apple Sales (C-595/17) the ECJ gave a boost to the discussion on the range of choice of court agreements vis-à-vis antitrust claims. 1 Brussels Ia Regulation/Art.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 16, 2025
They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower court ruling to the contrary. Five judges dissented, in an opinion written by Judge Julius Richardson. Relisted after the Jan.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content