Remove Court Rules Remove Entertainment Remove Litigating
article thumbnail

The Briefing by The IP Law Blog: Court Rules Litigation Funding Not Relevant in Netflix v. GoTV

The IP Law Blog

A court denied Netflix’s request for GoTV Streaming to supply documents relating to the source of its patent litigation funding. Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri discuss this dispute on this episode of The Briefing by the IP Law Blog. Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel. Read more about this case here.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will answer big-ticket COVID insurance question for the Ninth Circuit

At the Lectern

The Supreme Court today agreed to answer this question posed by the Ninth Circuit in Another Planet Entertainment, LLC v. The court has shown no interest in COVID insurance issues when they arise in state court litigation. of California’s Supreme Court, part 2

Court 63
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Down to a T: Ticketmaster, Taylor Swift, and Antitrust Laws

Fordham Law News

14] Since Ticketmaster’s 2010 merger with Live Nation Entertainment, it has faced criticism about its size, power in the entertainment industry, and how it displays the characteristics of a monopoly. [15] 20] When the case was brought by Tickets.com, Ticketmaster and Live Nation Entertainment had not yet merged. [21]

article thumbnail

In back-to-back cases, justices will scrutinize traditional limits on challenges to agency proceedings

SCOTUSBlog

Cochran present a frontal assault on the traditional framework under which federal courts have entertained complaints about federal agencies. The ALJ imposed a substantial monetary penalty and barred her from practice before the SEC, but the decision was vacated after the Supreme Court ruled in Lucia v.

Statute 108
article thumbnail

Case preview: Justices to consider procedural issue in major climate-change lawsuit

SCOTUSBlog

The companies suggest that their interpretation is consistent with the Supreme Court’s cases interpreting three other statutes allowing review of district court orders, in which the court ruled that an appeals court can review both “the particular aspect of the order that permitted the appeal” and also “any other issues encompassed in the order.”

Statute 117
article thumbnail

Brnovich, election-law tradeoffs, and the limited role of the courts

SCOTUSBlog

Brnovich is the latest in a line of cases suggesting that the federal courts should play a smaller role in the patrolling of how states administer elections. The court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause said that federal courts should not entertain challenges to partisan gerrymandering under the Constitution.

Laws 100
article thumbnail

Seeking Transparency in Waco

Patently O

Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. Judge Alan Albright’s court in the Western District of Texas is rapidly becoming the latest hot spot for patent litigation. Moreover, individual court rules are now requiring greater transparency.