This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Kenyan Supreme Courtruled Friday that married couples are not automatically entitled to equal shares of matrimonial property in case of divorce. This precedential ruling stated that upon divorce each partner should exit their marriage with the wealth each of them acquired individually.
The post Oregon Supreme CourtRules On Messy Multimillionaire Heir, Egg Donor Case appeared first on Above the Law. Once again, a friendly reminder about sending your clients to attorneys with specialized experience in assisted reproductive technology when entering such contracts.
First, the court found that—despite petitioners’ claims—Congress does maintain the authority to regulate adoption and foster proceedings involving Indigenous children. Petitioners’ contended that the proceedings fall within the realm of familylaw, which is usually governed by state law.
Corporate work is nothing like familylaw, which is nothing like personal injury. Double-check courtrules, confirm filing requirements, and when in doubt, ask someone with authority and expertise. So go read the rules, and then let’s talk.” Every practice area offers a completely different experience.
The Arrangement on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, which allows for specific courtrulings from mainland China to be enforced in Hong Kong, officially came into operation on Monday.
Those same couples who are now permitted to use surrogacy-assistance to expand their families, are still not permitted to marry within the country. It's a little meshuga.
Never Miss a Beat (or a Deadline) In law, a missed deadline can spell disaster. Robust calendaring systems , when integrated with courtrules, provide a safety net. Automatic deadline calculation based on courtrules is perhaps the most critical aspect of these systems.
She started it with just an associate’s degree, her paralegal certification, and around 15 or so years of paralegal experience working primarily in personal injury, but with a sprinkling in of some familylaw, criminal, and real estate. They had some familylaw questions because of who has parental rights.
When it comes to litigation, missing a deadline isn’t an option, and with so many shifting statutory and courtrules to adhere to, that can be difficult to manage. A rules-based calendaring system not only houses your calendar and upcoming deadlines but also syncs with any rules you set, including a specific court’srules.
The Courtruled in favor of a party’s constitutionally-based privacy right to reproduce or not reproduce over a sincerely held religious belief that embryos are people. . The post Colorado Court Of Appeals Rules For Privacy Rights In Embryo Dispute appeared first on Above the Law.
CourtRules Integration Navigating the complexities of courtrules and procedures across different jurisdictions can be a challenging task, especially when dealing with multiple cases. This eliminates the need to manually research and track courtrules, saving valuable time and minimizing the risk of errors.
Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen” I will start with the two areas that are mainly questions of Rome I and Rome II while in my follow-up post I will focus on the three areas that are not harmonized by EU law (yet) and are mainly questions of familylaw.
QUESTION: I’m a solo practitioner with a general practice handling everything from real estate transactions to familylaw. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. Transitioning to flat fees means passing the reasonableness test and following local ethics guide rails.
IV (Elgar Editions, 2017) 3895 and my own translation of the provisions dealing with international jurisdiction and the enforcement of foreign judgments in 8 Journal of Private International Law 2 (2012) pp. The courtruled as follows (only relevant parts are reproduced here. Supreme Court, Ruling No.
This week: Riverside updates its case management system, LA streamlines filing deadline for FamilyLaw ex parte applications, and courts update operations. The post October 30, 2020: Weekly court update appeared first on One Legal.
The couple applies in the Netherlands for, among other things, recognition of several court decisions on legal parenthood issued in the US, including a decision on denial of paternity, denial of maternity and establishment of paternity, and a decision on custody. Important here is that the surrogacy process has been diligent.
All of the work that a litigation paralegal does is usually tied to a deadline set by the courtrules or the judge. Ability to Work Well Under Pressure Litigation paralegals must have good time management skills. As part of this, time management is important. However, for a litigation paralegal, it is more than just managing time.
It is extremely important you review the rules relevant to your state, or frequently familiarize yourself with Federal rules if you handle those types of matters. Personally, even when I "know" the rules, I find it helpful to review periodically. Again, this may be different in different courts throughout the country.
The defendants challenged the jurisdiction of the Bahraini court based on the forum selection clause, but did not present any claim as to the merits of the case. Regarding choice of lawrules, those concerning familylaw and successions (i.e., 231/2005 of 27 February 2006 ). 5/11341/2023/02 of 4 January 2024 ).
Part 1 – Illegal Gambling and “Volkswagen” I will start with the two areas that are mainly questions of Rome I and Rome II while in my follow-up post I will focus on the three areas that are not harmonized by EU law (yet) and are mainly questions of familylaw.
On the other hand, a small familylaw firm could leverage a much simpler docketing system that focuses on calendaring. Why is Docketing Important for Law Firms? Additionally, MyCase offers a direct LawToolBox integration that provides access to a library of hundreds of courtrule sets across the U.S.
This is particularly helpful for law firms in practice areas with a high volume of client appointments and court appearances, such as criminal law and familylaw. . For example, you’re covered if you and your team members schedule dozens of client appointments and numerous court appearances every month.
Book ing.com and held that a dispute based on unfair competition law relating to the termination of an account for an online publishing platform is a contractual dispute under Art. More importantly, the court considered the requirement of a “real connecting link” in the context of Art. 7(1) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation.
At the same time, Indian courts recognising lex situs have respected foreign judgements concerning overseas property, and have observed that foreign forums should also reciprocate by recognising Indian judgements concerning immovable property in India. Narasimha Rao v. As shown by Mills (pp.7-10)
Share In a major ruling on Thursday, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act, a 1978 federal law that seeks to keep Native American children with Native American families. Four tribes later joined the case to defend the law.
The Federal Court of Justice concludes that the double proxy marriage took place in Mexico, which is why the marriage was formally valid under the applicable local law. Frantzen: Norwegian International Law of Inheritance. This decision makes a valid point, but seems too general and reaches too far.
The case presented here provides yet another compelling example of how Moroccan courts interpret and apply the HCCH 1980 Child Abduction Convention in a manner consistent with Moroccos international obligations. Although the Supreme Courtsruling was issued over a year ago ( Ruling No.
The High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (hereafter, the High Court) considered that, the children welfare and well-being should be paramount and must be assessed independently by Bangladeshi courts, regardless of any foreign judgment. 6592 of 2021 of 21 November 2021.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content