Remove Court Rules Remove Florida Remove Statute
article thumbnail

NAACP issues travel advisory for Florida over state efforts to limit Black history classes and ban diversity programs in schools

JURIST

The NAACP Board of Directors issued a formal travel advisory Sunday for the state of Florida over a series of laws recently signed by Governor Ron DeSantis that the organization says “[attempt] to erase Black history and to restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in Florida schools.”

Education 197
article thumbnail

Business owners seek to reclaim cash seized in drug bust

SCOTUSBlog

This week, we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether that 30-day deadline bars owners from reclaiming property if they file with a missing signature. Luis Sanchez is a part-owner of a small business in Florida selling electronics to Latin American customers. In Sanchez v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Gun Violence: When ‘Self-Defense’ Becomes Murder

The Crime Report

Howrey Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School, state statutes vary widely on defining what constitutes aggression. Concealed carry is allowed in all 50 states, and a Supreme Court ruling is expected shortly in a New York case about whether individuals have a Second Amendment right to carry guns openly in self-defense.

article thumbnail

Using Photos on Your Website – Court Decision Highlights Problems with a Creative Commons License and Other Copyright Issues

Broadcast Law Blog

One example is a recent US District Court ruling on a motion for summary judgment of a copyright lawsuit brought by a photographer when his photos of Willie Nelson and Carlos Santana appeared on a news website to illustrate articles on the musicians. However, relying on the creative commons license can be perilous.

article thumbnail

Mandatory minimums, payday lending, and voting rights in first session of Supreme Court term

SCOTUSBlog

But the lower courts ruled, and the federal government contends, that the “safety value” is only available to defendants who do not have any of the indicators. After the oral argument in Murray , the court will make a rare foray into admiralty law, in Great Lakes Insurance v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co.

Court 144
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Great Lakes

Conflict of Laws

After the yacht ran aground in Florida and sustained significant damage, Raiders filed a claim. Because the claims were based on Pennsylvania statutes, it argued, they were barred by the choice-of-law clause. The trial court ruled in favor of GLI. The Third Circuit ruled in favor of Raiders.

Court 69
article thumbnail

Oops!… [FDA] Did It Again: Another Orphan Drug Act Loss for FDA Based on Unambiguous Statutory Text; 11th Circuit Rules that the Scope of Orphan Drug Exclusivity is Determined by the Rare Disease or Condition Designated, and Not the Indication Approved

FDA Law Blog

In yet another decision based on statutory interpretation, an appellate court has decided that FDA’s interpretation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) is contrary to the plain text of the statute. As courts keep hitting the Agency “…Baby, One More Time ,” the appellate court these days seems Toxic for FDA.

Statute 52