JURIST

FEBRUARY 19, 2024

The UN expressed concern Monday over the UK government’s action to make the Rwanda deal operational. ” He warned of the negative human rights implications, stating: The combined effects of this bill, attempting to shield Government action from standard legal scrutiny, directly undercut basic human rights principles. .”

Government 197

Government Immigration Constitutional Law Court Rules 197

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 13, 2022

Share In a pair of cases on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled against non-U.S. 1231 , the government detained him. 1231 , the government detained him. Fearing persecution or torture in Mexico, Arteaga-Martinez then sought “withholding of removal,” which bars the government from removing a noncitizen to such a country.

Immigration 98

Immigration Court Rules Statute Court 98

JURIST

MARCH 27, 2024

The law would also empower state magistrates to issue removal orders to individuals found to be in breach of immigration policy. Historically, immigration policy has been the prerogative of the federal government. ” Texas officials have yet to respond directly to the ruling. .”

Immigration 138

Immigration Litigation Litigating Laws 138

HowAppealing

JUNE 14, 2022

“Supreme Court Rejects Bail Hearings for Jailed Immigrants; A federal law, the justices ruled, does not require immigration judges to consider whether immigrants may be released while their challenges are pending”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Rules Court Laws 100

JURIST

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

The US Department of Justice filed an appeal on Friday with the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit challenging a lower court ruling in July blocking new applications to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Court Rules 197

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 197

JURIST

JULY 28, 2023

The UK High Court ruled on Thursday that Secretary of State for the Home Department Suella Braverman must not exercise her new powers to restrict protection and support of victims of modern slavery without first considering the risks of re-trafficking.

Government 196

Government Court Immigration Court Rules 196

JURIST

MAY 13, 2024

The aim of the act was “to prevent and deter unlawful migration, and in particular migration by unsafe and illegal routes, by requiring the removal from the United Kingdom of certain persons who enter or arrive in the United Kingdom in breach of immigration control.” We must start the flights to stop the boats.”

Court Rules 162

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 162

JURIST

JANUARY 23, 2024

The UK Government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda suffered a setback Monday, when the House of Lords voted to require the government to substantiate its claims that Rwanda is a safe country before ratifying the new treaty between the UK and the African nation.

Government 104

Government Immigration Court Rules Legal 104

JURIST

AUGUST 1, 2022

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Monday that two vessels owned by non-profit Sea Watch may have been wrongly detained by the Italian government. The court found that Sea Watch has a right to rescue, despite its cargo status, under its duty to assist during a maritime emergency.

Court Rules 196

Court Rules Court Government Legal 196

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2023

Share In an opinion released on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that noncitizens subject to deportation do not have to ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider its allegedly erroneous decisions before seeking judicial review in the federal courts of appeals. The court’s conclusion is not entirely surprising.

Court Rules 105

Court Rules Court Immigration Litigation 105

JURIST

JUNE 7, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday on an immigrant status case regarding noncitizens seeking to change their immigration status from temporary protected status (TPS) to lawful permanent residency.

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Court Rules Statute 188

HowAppealing

JUNE 30, 2021

“Supreme Court Backs Pipeline in Case on New Jersey Land Seizures; By a 5-to-4 vote, the court said the federal government could delegate its power to condemn state property to a private company”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Government 100

Government Immigration Court Rules Court 100

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 9, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to hear four new cases, including a First Amendment challenge to a federal law that prohibits encouraging illegal immigration. Three years ago, the court agreed to take up this question in another case, United States v. Instead, a unanimous court ruled that the U.S.

Immigration 88

Immigration Statute Court Court Rules 88

JURIST

JANUARY 16, 2024

.” The UNHCR’s assessment comes following the signing of the UK-Rwanda Asylum Partnership Treaty in December 2023 and the proposal of the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill. In response to the bill, the Rwandan government threatened to withdraw from the treaty if the UK did not adhere to international law.

Laws 197

Laws Immigration Government Legal 197

JURIST

JANUARY 18, 2024

The UK government Wednesday published letters regarding how civil servants should follow the Safety of Rwanda Bill. The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill was introduced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s government in response to a UK Supreme Court ruling in November.

Immigration 118

Immigration Government Court Rules Court 118

JURIST

DECEMBER 17, 2021

The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday they would hear the appeal of a lower court ruling that re-implemented Canada’s Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) with the United States. The STCA was signed between the US and Canadian governments in 2002.

Court 197

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 197

JURIST

MARCH 29, 2024

The UN Committee on Human Rights called on the UK on Thursday to withdraw the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill and certain provisions of the Illegal Migration Act 2023 due to human rights concerns. ” Its approach has received widespread criticism.

Immigration 244

Immigration Court Rules Laws Government 244

JURIST

APRIL 22, 2024

The UK’s Parliament on Tuesday approved the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill , which would declare Rwanda a “safe country” in order to send certain asylum seekers there while they await their applications to be assessed. The court ruled in November 2023, that Rwanda could not be considered a safe country.

Court 104

Court Immigration Government Court Rules 104

JURIST

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

The Hungarian government also built a border fence along the Serbian border and used riot police to repulse asylum seekers trying to cross closed border points. Hungary has brought the matter to the Hungarian Constitutional Court and stated that it cannot comply with the European ruling until its own court rules on the issue.

Laws 204

Laws Immigration Court Court Rules 204

JURIST

NOVEMBER 15, 2023

The UK Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the government’s Rwanda plan is unlawful. The Rwanda plan was an immigration policy used by the UK government to “stop the boats” of migrants arriving in the UK. We are determined to protect our borders. And we are determined to stop the boats.

Court 104

Court Immigration Court Rules Legal 104

JURIST

APRIL 26, 2024

King Charles III has given his assent to the UK government’s legislation which will allow asylum seekers to be sent to Rwanda. The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill 2024 received Royal Assent on Thursday and will now become law in the UK.

Laws 118

Laws Immigration Government Court Rules 118

JURIST

DECEMBER 22, 2023

The Washington Supreme Court ruled Thursday that civil immigration detainees employed in private facilities must be treated as legal employees and are thus entitled to the minimum wage stipulated by the state. The case, Ugochukwu Goodluck Nwauzor, et al v. The GEO Group, Inc.

Immigration 223

Immigration Court Rules Court Contract 223

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 7, 2021

Share The Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Monday that noncitizens who have been granted temporary humanitarian relief from deportation cannot use the process known as “adjustment of status” to obtain lawful permanent residency in the United States without leaving the country. The court ruled in Sanchez v.

Immigration 141

Immigration Government Statute Court Rules 141

JURIST

SEPTEMBER 8, 2023

A US federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Texas can leave the floating barrier in the Rio Grande after a district court ordered the state to remove it on Wednesday. Texas Governor Greg Abbott appealed the order along with an emergency motion to stay the district court’s order earlier on Thursday.

Court 232

Court Court Rules Government Immigration 232

JURIST

JUNE 24, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Rules Court Statute 211

JURIST

OCTOBER 4, 2022

Garland the court is again asked to examine administrative procedure, this time in the context of an immigration proceeding. Leon Santos-Zacaria is an immigrant who was removed from the US but later reentered the country. That holding was later upheld by the Board of Immigration Appeals, an administrative body.

Court 118

Court Immigration Tort Law Firm 118

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2021

Guzman Chavez , the court ruled against a group of noncitizens who applied for withholding relief and sought hearings to determine if they could be released on bond while immigration authorities reviewed their withholding claims. The court divided along conservative and liberal lines. 1231 controlled.

Immigration 105

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 105

JURIST

JULY 1, 2023

On April 19, 2023, the High Court of Manipur directed the state government to consider the inclusion of the Meitei community in the ‘Scheduled Tribes’ list and send its recommendations to the Government of India within four weeks. The situation in the state has been tense ever since violence broke out on May 03, 2023.

Government 104

Government Court Rules Court Immigration 104

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2024

The district court ruled for Medical Marijuana and the other companies on Horn’s RICO claim. McDonough , the justices agreed to weigh in on the application of the “benefit of the doubt” rule – the idea that a veteran, rather than the government, should receive the benefit of the doubt on close issues involving veterans’ law.

Personal Injury 100

Personal Injury Court Immigration Statute 100

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 29, 2021

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, adopting a rigid interpretation of a federal statute that requires the government to serve a “notice to appear” in order to trigger the “stop-time” rule. That rule can foreclose access to immigration relief by preventing noncitizens from accruing the time required for eligibility.

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Rules Government Laws 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 5, 2021

Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents , the Supreme Court ruled that a private individual could sue an FBI agent for violating his Fourth Amendment rights, even when there was not a specific law authorizing a claim for damages. The district court ruled that Boule’s claims would impermissibly extend Bivens , but the U.S.

Immigration 80

Immigration Court Rules Court Government 80

The Crime Report

JANUARY 6, 2023

People walk dangerous routes when the government eliminates or fails to provide legal avenues that are safe, permanent and predictable whether it’s across the street or across an international border. Code made it a crime to cross the border without authorization, with a specific intent to target Mexican immigrants.

Immigration 114

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Government 114

HowAppealing

MARCH 27, 2024

“Appeals Court Keeps Block on Texas Migrant Arrest Law; The decision in favor of the federal government left in place a trial court injunction while courts determine whether the measure is legal”: J. appeals court keeps block on Texas immigration law.”

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Court Legal 100

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 12, 2023

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Rules Court Entertainment 52

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, whether the prosecution in a case of illegal gun possession by a person with a nonimmigrant visa must prove he knew of his legal status, and the inquiry courts should follow in deciding to close the courtroom to the public.

Statute 84

Statute Government Court Immigration 84

JURIST

JULY 17, 2021

” He vacated the program itself and the memorandum that created it, and enjoined the government “from administering the DACA program and from reimplementing DACA without compliance with the APA.” ” The post Texas district court rules DACA unlawful appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

Court Rules 239

Court Rules Court Legal Legal 239

The Crime Report

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

While the Joe Biden administration appeals a Texas court ruling that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) is unlawful, the decision is blocking more than 80,000 new applications from young adults who were brought to the United States illegally as children and are seeking protection under the program, reports the Chicago Tribune.

Court Rules 94

Court Rules Immigration Court Attorney 94