Remove Court Rules Remove Government Remove Misdemeanor Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Was Rittenhouse’s Possession of the AR-15 Unlawful?

JonathanTurley

The statement could effectively knock out the misdemeanor gun possession count — the one count that could still be in play for the jury after the prosecution’s case on the more serious offense appeared to collapse in court. It is also hard to instruct a jury on an ambiguous statute. I have a legal education.”

Statute 57
article thumbnail

No sentencing enhancements for recklessness convictions under federal Armed Career Criminal Act

SCOTUSBlog

The case came to the court after Charles Borden Jr. At sentencing, the government sought an enhancement under the ACCA; it claimed that three of Borden’s prior felony convictions were violent felonies. He asserted that one of the felonies the government cited included recklessness, and, therefore, was not a violent felony.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A no-straight-grant Wednesday conference

At the Lectern

Immunity for law enforcement : The court granted-and-held in Nelson v. County of Riverside , which is expected to decide whether immunity under Government Code section 821.6 Supreme Court, which, in reversing a First District, Division Five, decision ( People v. In a rare ruling, the court granted review in Munoz v.

article thumbnail

Fourth Circuit Overturns Conviction Of Retired Air Force Colonel For Using Racial Slur

JonathanTurley

” The language of the statute in my view is unconstitutional due to its sweeping criminalization of any “curse or abuse” that could “provoke a breach of the peace.” As the United States Supreme Court ruled in National Ass’n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Winston , 199 S.E.2d

Statute 39
article thumbnail

Court expands government’s ability to deport noncitizens for offenses related to obstruction of justice

SCOTUSBlog

By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in Pugin v. The role of the court, he began, was not to craft a new federal obstruction of justice offense, “but rather to determine which state or federal offenses ‘relate to obstruction of justice.’” Such “redundancies are common in statutory drafting,” Kavanaugh wrote.

Felony 98
article thumbnail

Freedom of Movement: Understanding Immigration Through The Lens Of Jaywalking Laws

The Crime Report

People walk dangerous routes when the government eliminates or fails to provide legal avenues that are safe, permanent and predictable whether it’s across the street or across an international border. In 1969, the Supreme Court held in Shapiro v. When someone ‘jaywalks’ from the Mexican side of the border to the U.S. Thompson that U.S.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court will hear forum selection and workers’ comp cases, but it turns down two animal rights matters; also, there’s one separate statement

At the Lectern

At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Court ruled on a robust 164 matters. The court granted review in EpicentRx, Inc. Had the defendant’s conviction been of a misdemeanor instead of later reduced to a misdemeanor, lifetime registration would have been discretionary instead of mandatory.