This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Oklahoma Supreme Courtruled Tuesday that the creation of a publicly-funded religious charter school, S t. Isidore of Seville Virtual Charter School violates the First Amendment and Oklahoma State Constitution. The court said the St. ” This is binding on state through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon added three more cases two of which will be argued together to its docket for the 2024-25 term. In a brief unsigned order , the justices agreed to review a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court that rejected an effort by a Catholic online school to become the nations first religious charter school.
The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on Friday vacated a previous ruling that dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Oklahoma-based Muscogee (Creek) Nation, who challenged the construction of a casino in Alabama on land they claim is sacred.
Share Less than two years ago, the Supreme Courtruled in McGirt v. Although Castro-Huerta is not a Native American, his stepdaughter is a member of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, and the OklahomaCourt of Criminal Appeals vacated his conviction because the crime occurred in Indian country.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday left in place a federal appeals courtruling that bars the city of Tulsa from enforcing municipal ordinances against Native Americans. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit on hold to give the city time to appeal. But two years later, the Supreme Courtruled in McGirt v.
ASEA filed counterclaims asking the court to enjoin Alaska from implementing the governor’s administrative order and from making any changes to the dues-deduction processes that were in place before the opinion was issued. The district court “reluctan[tly]” sent the case back to state court, and the U.S.
United States , which examines whether the federal government can bring criminal charges in federal court against a defendant previously found guilty in a Court of Indian Offenses for an offense stemming from the same act. Kimberly responded that there are two easy fixes, both of which, he asserted, respect tribal sovereignty.
to be “paid back”) out of any recovery, and then to take some hefty percentage—often 60% or more of whatever is remaining, particularly in litigations deemed high-risk (like patent litigation), though there are no rulesgoverning how much funders can ask for. (It 24] At the Federal level, the U.S. 2] See generally U.S.
Oklahoma Federal Court Allowed Landowner to Proceed with NEPA Challenge of Osage Nation Oil and Gas Leases. The federal district court for the Northern District of Oklahoma denied non-federal defendants’ motion to dismiss a landowner’s lawsuit claiming that the U.S. European Court of Human Rights). Zepeda , No.
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Richard Glossip, who is on death row in Oklahoma for his role in the 1997 murder of motel owner Barry Van Treese, should get a new trial. Prosecutors have never contended that Glossip himself killed Van Treese, who owned the Oklahoma City motel where he worked.
Share Twice in the past decade the Supreme Court has blocked Oklahoma from executing Richard Glossip. But even with the Oklahoma’s rare confession of error, both the state’s highest court for criminal cases and the state’s pardon and parole board turned down Glossip’s pleas for relief. 9, two former U.S.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, a potential replacement for the now-dismissed Servotronics Inc. Oklahoma should apply retroactively, and whether the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act violates a website designer’s First Amendment rights. In last year’s McGirt v.
And because the resolution of that case may have broader implications for states ability to regulate the speech of professionals, the court is now holding two twice-relisted cases that raise First Amendment challenges to state occupational licensing laws. Oklahoma , which the court had decided to review and was then in the briefing process.
In my second dispatch from this Convention, I spoke with the amendment’s sponsor, Crispin South, a Choctaw law student at ASU and a delegate representing Oklahoma. He said the amendment was important to protect tribal sovereignty from Supreme Courts that often don’t understand the rights tribal nations have. New London.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, a direct challenge to the court’sruling in McGirt v. Last year, the Supreme Courtruled 5-4 in McGirt v. Now, Oklahoma alleges in Oklahoma v.
Madrid , the Supreme Courtruled that the application of physical force by police officers, with the intent to restrain, is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, even if the suspect does not submit and is not subdued. City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma v. Three months ago in Torres v. United States. United States. 20-1709.
After a dispute over the trademarks for remote controls used to operate heavy construction equipment, a jury awarded Oklahoma-based Hetronic International, Inc. In April, the court called for the views of the solicitor general , and her brief arrived in latish September. Hetronic International, Inc. trademarks.
The school district ordered Kennedy to stop praying so that the district did not violate the Constitution’s establishment clause, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another. Alito wrote that Kennedy’s free-speech claim raised important issues, and he suggested the case may warrant review in the future.
To obtain a conviction, is it enough for the government to show that a doctor’s prescribing practices departed from objective standards of medical care? Or must the government also prove that the doctor subjectively understood that the prescriptions at issue served no genuine medical purpose?
Anti-abortion advocates hoped to amend the state constitution to stipulate that “the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion.” In 2019 the Kansas Supreme Courtruled in Hodes & Nauser v.
A group of faith leaders, education advocates and parents filed an amicus brief Monday, urging the US Supreme Court to block Oklahoma’s first religious public school. Oklahoma is proposing the opening of St. The Oklahoma Supreme Courtruled in June of 2024 that the creation of St.
The states urged the justices to stay out of the dispute and to allow the lower courts’ rulings to stand. Louisiana and the other challengers in that case pushed back against the Biden administration’s suggestion that the lower court’s order sweeps too broadly because it puts the whole rule on hold.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a Catholic virtual charter schools bid to become the nations first religious charter school. But the states attorney general counters that a ruling in favor of the Catholic school could upend the charter-school system nationwide. The state supreme court granted that request.
Either or both cases could return to the Supreme Court once the federal appeals courtsrule on the merits of the dispute. Nebraska , a divided courtruled that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority when it announced the debt relief program, which relied on the HEROES Act, a law passed in the wake of the Sept.
The Republican-led “anti-ESG” (environmental, social, governance) movement over the last two years has largely been a legislative effort, comprised primarily of state-level bills that attempt to halt the consideration of climate risk and other commonplace factors in investment decisions connected with government funds, contracts, and pensions.
This minimal test requires government action to have a legitimate purpose and the law in question to be rationally related to that purpose. Additionally, travel distance is a known barrier to care that jeopardizes health, which the court recognized in 2016 in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.
The case began two years ago, when Oklahomas charter school board approved an application by the archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the diocese of Tulsa to establish St. Gentner Drummond, the states Republican attorney general, went to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, asking it to invalidate the boards contract with St.
Yellen addresses the Constitution’s allocation of taxing authority between the federal and state governments. Oklahoma applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was decided. The 2017 cap on the federal tax deduction for state and local taxes. New York v. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Issue : Whether McGirt v.
On the other hand, challenges to the EPA’s approval or issuance of any implementation plan, as well as any other final action by the EPA that is “locally or regionally applicable,” can only be filed in the local or regional court of appeals. In Oklahoma v. EPA and PacifiCorp v. In Brinkmann v. Town of Southold, N.Y. ,
Until 2020, the horse-racing industry was governed primarily by the states, resulting in a patchwork of differing regulations. The district court dismissed both claims. The authority noted that the FTC has the power both to stop enforcement actions by the authority and to review decisions once they are made. Relisted after the Jan.
If the justices decide to take up any of these cases, the government will presumably be represented in its briefs and at oral argument at the Supreme Court by Trumps pick for solicitor general, John Sauer. Student-loan forgiveness Another 5th Circuit ruling led to the governments petition in Department of Education v.
A federal district courtruled that emails sent by Eastman, who in August was indicted in Georgia along with former President Donald Trump and 17 others on charges that they conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 election, should be turned over under the “crime-fraud” exception to the protection for attorney-client communications.
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to lift those orders while they appealed. The court of appeals refused, instead expediting argument. By a split vote, the 6th Circuit then reversed the lower courts’ rulings , concluding that the states were likely to win their appeals. The court thus allowed the laws go into effect.
The court dealt with a set of similar cases out of Idaho in June without reaching a conclusive decision on the federal law. The court’s denial on Monday leaves in place a lower courtruling for Texas, but the question at the center of the case remains unresolved nationally. Mulready v.
The justices invited Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher to file briefs expressing the federal government’s views in three cases. Intratek Computer , the government will weigh in on the effect of a federal whistleblower statute on an arbitration agreement between an employer and its employee. In Robertson v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content