JURIST

JUNE 15, 2023

The US Supreme Court declined on Thursday to disturb a federal statute governing the adoption and foster proceedings for Indigenous children in the US. The court issued three findings in its Thursday decision. The court first heard oral arguments in the case back in November 2022.

Court Rules 118

Court Rules Court Family Law Statute 118

JURIST

JUNE 18, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can retain its power to dismiss third-party federal whistleblower actions filed on behalf of the government under the False Claims Act (FCA). When a relator files a complaint, the Government gets an initial opportunity to intervene in the case.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Court Government Statute 104

JURIST

JULY 4, 2024

The Supreme Court of Japan ordered the Japanese government to compensate victims of forced sterilization after holding that the now-defunct Eugenic Protection Law was unconstitutional. The decision was a unified decision on five different appeals from Tokyo , Sendai , Sapporo , and Osaka.

Laws 197

Laws Court Statute Lawyer 197

JURIST

JUNE 1, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday that tribal police officers have the authority to detain and search non-Indigenous persons on federal highways within their territories. The decision quiets what some feared would be a further infringement on the inherent sovereignty tribes possess to govern themselves.

Court Rules 223

Court Rules Court Statute Government 223

JURIST

APRIL 16, 2021

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the Department of Health Services (DHS) lacked authority to limit capacities for indoor public gatherings. As a result, the court held that “Emergency Order 3 should have been promulgated according to rulemaking procedures set forth in Wis.

Court Rules 164

Court Rules Court Statute Government 164

FDA Law Blog

JULY 8, 2024

By Riëtte van Laack & JP Ellison — On Thursday, the 27 th of June, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. The first question in the Court’s analysis was whether the claim that the SEC brought is a “suit at common law,” i.e., if the case is legal in nature. Jarkesy.

Court Rules 59

Court Rules Cause of Action Court Statute 59

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 6, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Monday morning added one new case to its docket for the 2022-23 term, a technical dispute over the binding nature of the statute of limitations for a federal property law. A lower court ruled that the landowners filed their lawsuit too late and that the statute of limitations is jurisdictional.

Statute 76

Statute Government Court Rules Court 76

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 13, 2022

Share In a pair of cases on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled against non-U.S. Pursuant to the post-removal order statute, 8 U.S.C. 1231 , the government detained him. Pursuant to the post-removal order statute, 8 U.S.C. 1231 , the government detained him. The first case, Johnson v.

Immigration 98

Immigration Court Rules Statute Court 98

JURIST

DECEMBER 30, 2022

The Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas reversed the Board’s decision without affording any deference to the agency’s interpretation of the relevant statute. Later, the Ohio First District Court of Appeals held that a court must defer to an administrative interpretation only if the court finds a statute to be ambiguous.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Court Laws Statute 104

JURIST

OCTOBER 7, 2021

The court delivered the landmark decision in an appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against an NGT order on waste disposal that was issued after the NGT took suo moto cognizance of an article published by an online news source.

Court Rules 104

Court Rules Court Government Statute 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 22, 2023

Share Under a historic water crisis in the desert southwest, the Navajo Nation asked for a court order requiring the federal government to determine the Nation’s water needs and to devise a plan to meet those needs. Gorsuch would have framed the issue before the court as a matter of applying the canons of construing Indian treaties.

Court Rules 144

Court Rules Court Government Litigation 144

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 28, 2024

1681n and 1681oauthorize suits for damages against “any person” who violates the FCRA, and §1681a expressly defines “person” to include “any” government agency. Supreme Court’s Decision The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed. “[W]e government. government. It held that the USDA could be sued because 15 U.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court Cause of Action Statute 52

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 16, 2023

Share The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Justice has broad, but not unfettered, authority to dismiss whistleblower lawsuits filed under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provision even when the government initially elected to allow the whistleblower to proceed with the action.

Government 109

Government Court Litigation Litigating 109

JURIST

DECEMBER 11, 2020

The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in United States v. Georgia that the Eighth Amendment forbids a death sentence for the rape of an adult woman, respondents argue that they could not, in fact, have been sentenced to death, and therefore the statute of limitations for their crimes. Justice Samuel Alito authored the opinion.

Court Rules 128

Court Rules Court Statute Laws 128

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 28, 2022

With spending clause legislation, the federal government provides funds in exchange for the funding recipient’s adherence to various conditions. The post Court rules against plaintiff seeking emotional distress damages for discrimination appeared first on SCOTUSblog. Check back soon for in-depth analysis of the opinion.

Court Rules 98

Court Rules Court Contract Statute 98

JURIST

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

In a unanimous decision on Wednesday, the US Supreme Court ruled that the heirs of Jewish art dealers cannot bring a lawsuit in US courts against Germany over the alleged forced sale of art and artifacts under the Nazi regime. The Court directed the lower court to reconsider the case in light of the opinion in Germany v.

Court Rules 194

Court Rules Court Statute Laws 194

JURIST

DECEMBER 21, 2020

Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeals ruled on Monday that the government-mandated mask ban, instituted in October 5, 2019, is constitutional. During the anti-government protests , which have largely died down, many demonstrators wore masks to hide their identities from authorities and to protect themselves from tear gas.

Court Rules 153

Court Rules Court Government Statute 153

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 16, 2023

Share In an opinion released on Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that noncitizens subject to deportation do not have to ask the Board of Immigration Appeals to reconsider its allegedly erroneous decisions before seeking judicial review in the federal courts of appeals. The court’s conclusion is not entirely surprising.

Court Rules 105

Court Rules Court Immigration Litigation 105

JonathanTurley

JUNE 20, 2024

However, Wisconsin has strong protections for home owners, including statutes expressly stating that the power of eminent domain must be “ strictly construed ” against the government. Moreover, there is a statute that expressly bars the use of eminent domain to take property to for “pedestrian way[s].”

Court Rules 54

Court Rules Statute Court Construction 54

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2023

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a Turkish bank can be prosecuted in U.S. courts for its role in a conspiracy to evade U.S. But the court left the door open for the bank to press a different immunity argument in the lower courts. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Court Rules 98

Court Rules Laws Court Punitive Damages 98

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 25, 2022

Share Federal courts employ the All Writs Act to serve countless ends, from assisting FBI investigations to prohibiting vexatious litigation to requiring Apple to access data. This statute, which was originally part of the Judiciary Act of 1789, empowers federal courts to “issue all writs” (i.e., Twyford disagrees.

Statute 89

Statute Court Rules Court Litigation 89

JURIST

DECEMBER 21, 2021

The UK Supreme Court Monday allowed an appeal by Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó in a dispute over whether he or President Nicolás Maduro has control over more than US $1 billion of Venezuela’s international gold reserves held by the Bank of England. The UK government considered this election deeply flawed.

Court 173

Court Statute Government Court Rules 173

JURIST

AUGUST 3, 2023

The court ruled that the law was valid under rational basis review. Under rational basis review, a court will uphold a law as constitutional if the government has a legitimate interest in enacting the statute and the law is rationally related to that interest. Circuit Judge Kenneth K.

Laws 197

Laws Court Statute Government 197

JURIST

JULY 7, 2024

In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled in Hodes & Nauser v Schmidt that the Kansas Constitution protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy. After the 2019 decision, the case was sent back to the Shawnee District Court to determine if S.B.

Court 197

Court Depose Court Rules Healthcare 197

The Crime Report

JUNE 29, 2022

50 years ago today, the Supreme Court in their opinion on Furman v. The decision forced federal and state governments to review their statutes to ensure that administration of the death penalty did not discriminate and was applied consistent to the Eight Amendment, prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.

Court Rules 96

Court Rules Court Statute Government 96

JURIST

JUNE 7, 2021

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday on an immigrant status case regarding noncitizens seeking to change their immigration status from temporary protected status (TPS) to lawful permanent residency.

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Court Rules Statute 188

JURIST

MARCH 8, 2023

In Wimes’ opinion and order, the court ruled that SAPA is “unconstitutional in its entirety.” ” The court ruled that SAPA violates the Supremacy Clause because it tries to invalidate federal law. Under the doctrine, state legislatures cannot invalidate or disregard federal statutes.

Laws 118

Laws Court Rules Statute Court 118

JURIST

APRIL 19, 2022

After the Amendment took effect on January 1, 2018, Circuit City, a US chain of electronics retail stores, refused to pay the increased fees and brought suit in the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, claiming that the 2017 Amendment, which creates nonuniform bankruptcy laws, was unconstitutional.

Laws 270

Laws Government Constitutional Law Court 270

Constitutional Law Reporter

FEBRUARY 23, 2021

The heirs allege that when the Nazi government rose to power, it unlawfully coerced the consortium into selling the collection to Prussia for a third of its value. 108, 115 (2013), Roberts emphasized that the Court has long recognized that “United States law governs domestically but does not rule the world.”

Court Rules 89

Court Rules Court Government Laws 89

FDA Law Blog

JULY 2, 2024

Claud — Among the tools that the government has to enforce the FDC Act is the injunctive power granted by Congress in 21 U.S.C. § That statute provides that courts “ shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown, to restrain violations ” of the FDC Act. By JP Ellison & John W.M. N atural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Statute 52

Statute Litigation Litigating Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 1, 2023

Natural Resources Defense Council , the Supreme Court ruled that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute as long as that interpretation is reasonable. On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to reconsider its ruling in Chevron. Share Nearly 40 years ago, in Chevron v.

Compensatory Damages 145

Compensatory Damages Court Statute Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Generally speaking, that line of cases has limited the circumstances in which statutes that impose timing requirements on federal causes of action are regarded as jurisdictional – which means that they automatically and categorically keep a case out of court. Why, you might ask, should this matter? In most cases, perhaps, it would not.

Statute 72

Statute Cause of Action Government Court 72

Law 360

NOVEMBER 14, 2023

Judges on the D.C.

Statute 52

Statute Court Rules Government Court 52

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 22, 2021

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against the federal government and in favor of people seeking Social Security benefits on a procedural issue about administrative “exhaustion” requirements. The court ruled 9-0 that claimants need not raise all of their specific issues before the agency.

Administrative Law 104

Administrative Law Statute Government Court Rules 104

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 17, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a VA benefits decision that was based on an agency regulation in effect at the time the decision was rendered does not constitute “clear and unmistakable error” even if the agency regulation is later deemed to conflict with the text of the relevant benefits statute.

Statute 103

Statute Legal Legal Court 103

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 10, 2022

The question before the court is a procedural one, focusing on the deadline for Reed to file a federal civil rights claim challenging the constitutionality of the Texas law governing DNA testing. In 2009, the Supreme Court ruled in District Attorney’s Office v. Reed urges the justices to adopt the rule used in the U.S.

Statute 106

Statute Construction Litigation Litigating 106

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 18, 2021

In this case, Chevron removed the lawsuit to a federal district court in Maryland, pointing to eight different grounds for removal. Baltimore asked the district court to send the case back to state court, and the district court agreed. This conclusion, the companies contend, flows from the plain text of 28 U.S.C.

Statute 132

Statute Court Reporting Court Court Reporter 132