Day on Torts

MARCH 11, 2022

When the brother was admitted, plaintiff filled out admission paperwork, including an arbitration agreement, as plaintiff had a durable power of attorney for healthcare executed by the brother and naming plaintiff as the attorney-in-fact. National Health Corp. , 3d 876 (Tenn. internal citation omitted). Code Ann. §

Attorney 59

Attorney Statute Healthcare Court 59

Day on Torts

APRIL 1, 2022

Bradley Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center , No. The Court noted that this interpretation “comports with the purpose of the certificate of good faith—weeding out frivolous lawsuits.”. Applying this reasoning to the case at hand, the Court ruled that Exhibit 7 did not satisfy the certificate of good faith requirements.

Depositions 59

Depositions Healthcare Statute Court 59

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 13, 2022

Share With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Supreme Court on Thursday put the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers on hold, while litigation over its legality continues in the lower courts.

Court 145

Court Healthcare Government Statute 145

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 3, 2021

In their petition, the challengers argue that the Federal Circuit’s decision contradicts a prior Supreme Court decision that held that Section 232 is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power to the executive branch because the statute establishes clear preconditions that the president must follow. Haystings v.

Healthcare 88

Healthcare Tort Education Court 88

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 6, 2022

A federal district court in Missouri put the rule on hold for 10 states, while a federal district court in Louisiana did the same for 14 other states. The states argue that the provision on which the government relies is a “housekeeping statute” that does not give HHS the broad power that the government claims.

Court 143

Court Government Healthcare Drafting 143

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 24, 2024

Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to lift those orders while they appealed. The court of appeals refused, instead expediting argument. By a split vote, the 6th Circuit then reversed the lower courts’ rulings , concluding that the states were likely to win their appeals. The court thus allowed the laws go into effect.

Felony 96

Felony Court Statute Laws 96