SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 26, 2021

1326 , they must prove the existence of a prior removal order adjudicated by a federal immigration agency. But if the earlier removal order is invalid on legal grounds, then how can the noncitizen use that fact to defend against the criminal re-entry prosecution? Palomar-Santiago’s legal case did not end with his physical removal.

Immigration 98

Immigration Felony Statute Court 98

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that it was too early to resolve the legality of the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people who are in the country illegally from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House of Representatives. Second, the president must send a report to Congress by Jan. At the Nov.

Immigration 105

Immigration Court Government Legal 105

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legal rules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 11, 2023

Groff sued USPS in federal court under Title VII for refusing to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices. The trial court ruled for the Postal Service under Hardison , and the U.S. That is because, as the U.S. A jury awarded Younger $700,000 in damages. Yegiazaryan v.

Government 82

Government Court Legal Legal 82

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation , No. and non-U.S. 17cv1215, 17cv1873, 17cv1911 (S.D.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

Allowing the emergency declarations to expire will unravel an array of federal policies on issues like free at-home tests, temporary Medicaid coverage, and even immigration. The plan is on hold as a result of lower-court rulings, and in a pair of cases being argued at the Supreme Court on Feb. The White House says yes.

Immigration 106

Immigration Legal Legal Court 106

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. Kruger left WilmerHale for the University of Chicago Law School, where she taught a class in transnational litigation as a visiting assistant professor. Early life and career.

Court 111

Court Laws Lawyers Lawyer 111

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The district court scheduled a hearing for April 16, 2020 to consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer those cases.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 18, 2022

Share For the third time this term, the Supreme Court will weigh in on whether someone can stage an intervention – the legal kind, that is. Rather than showing that Stein’s representation was inadequate, the court of appeals reasoned, the legislators had raised only “garden-variety disagreements over litigation strategy.”

Litigation 91

Litigation Litigating Attorney Court 91

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 3, 2022

Share The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that Kentucky’s attorney general should have been allowed to intervene to defend a state law restricting abortion after another state official declined to do so – even when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit had already struck down the law. The 8-1 decision in Cameron v.

Attorney 97

Attorney Legal Legal Laws 97

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 27, 2021

While most Administrations tend to minimize such test cases to avoid creating bad precedent, the Biden Administration has litigated with an utter abandon — elevating political over legal considerations in litigation. In the prior decision, the Court ruled 5-4 decision in Alabama Association of Realtors v.

Court 48

Court Legal Legal Court Rules 48

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Share On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a dispute over whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. immigration court. immigration court.

Immigration 96

Immigration Legal Legal Government 96

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.

Immigration 91

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 91