Remove Court Rules Remove Immigration Remove Louisiana
article thumbnail

Supreme Court will hear case on second majority-Black district in Louisiana redistricting

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear arguments early next year in the latest chapter in a protracted dispute over race and redistricting in Louisiana. Louisiana v. 8, that the Louisiana legislature adopted earlier this year. The court also granted a third case, Riley v. 5 until Nov. Callais and Robinson v.

Court 116
article thumbnail

US federal judge transfers pro-Palestine student activist’s case, denying attempt to dismiss

JURIST

Khalil, the petitioner, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in early March after he participated in pro-Palestine protests on his college campus last year. The government relied on the district-of-confinement and immediate-custodian rules to support its position.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The cases that remain

SCOTUSBlog

Louisiana v. Callais (argued March 24): This is a dispute over a congressional map that the Louisiana Legislature adopted last year. Sotomayor otherwise appears to be done for the term, as she has already written for March and April, while Gorsuch could still have a decision in March. Federal Communications Commission v.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules states lack constitutional standing in key immigration case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. ” Texas Governor Greg Abbott criticized the ruling, saying , “This decision is outrageous. .” SCOTUS [the Supreme Court] gives the Biden Admin.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules States Can’t Challenge Federal Immigration Policy

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”

article thumbnail

Two Landmark Rulings in U.S. and Mexico Split Over Border Treatment

The Crime Report

Two landmark rulings in the U.S. A Louisiana judge rejected President Joe Biden’s push to end Title 42, which restricted access of would-be asylum seekers to the U.S. and Mexico have given poilicymakers contradictory guidelines on the treatment of border crossers. during COVID-19, reports the Associated Press.

article thumbnail

Texas and Louisiana lack right to challenge Biden immigration policy, court rules

SCOTUSBlog

In a major victory for the Biden administration, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that Texas and Louisiana do not have a legal right, known as standing, to challenge a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation.