Court Rules Immigration Louisiana 
JURIST
JUNE 24, 2023
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. ” Texas Governor Greg Abbott criticized the ruling, saying , “This decision is outrageous. .” SCOTUS [the Supreme Court] gives the Biden Admin.
The Crime Report
JANUARY 4, 2023
I first stumbled on 911 call analysis while reporting on a police department in northern Louisiana. When they hear it,” a prosecutor in Louisiana once told Harpster, “it will be like a Dr. Phil ‘a-ha’ moment.” On it, Harpster has openly espoused misogynistic, transphobic, Islamophobic and anti-immigrant views. I was wrong.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 12, 2023
Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. According to the eight-member majority, “federal courts are generally not the proper forum for resolving claims that the Executive Branch should make more arrests or bring more prosecutions.”
The Crime Report
MAY 23, 2022
Two landmark rulings in the U.S. A Louisiana judge rejected President Joe Biden’s push to end Title 42, which restricted access of would-be asylum seekers to the U.S. and Mexico have given poilicymakers contradictory guidelines on the treatment of border crossers. during COVID-19, reports the Associated Press.
SCOTUSBlog
NOVEMBER 4, 2024
Share The Supreme Court will hear arguments early next year in the latest chapter in a protracted dispute over race and redistricting in Louisiana. Louisiana v. 8, that the Louisiana legislature adopted earlier this year. The court also granted a third case, Riley v. 5 until Nov. Callais and Robinson v.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 23, 2023
In a major victory for the Biden administration, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that Texas and Louisiana do not have a legal right, known as standing, to challenge a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation.
JURIST
MARCH 19, 2025
Khalil, the petitioner, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in early March after he participated in pro-Palestine protests on his college campus last year. The government relied on the district-of-confinement and immediate-custodian rules to support its position.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content