SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 17, 2021

Here’s the Thursday morning read: Reading the tea leaves: Remaining cases as of June 16 (Amy Howe, Howe on the Court). Activists, academics step up pressure on Justice Breyer to retire (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post). The Truth Teller of the Supreme Court (Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times).

Immigration 104

Immigration Court Rules Court 104

JURIST

NOVEMBER 3, 2021

A federal district court in Washington state ruled against a Tacoma for-profit immigration detention center in a minimum wage suit Tuesday, ordering its owners to pay $5.9 District Court Judge Robert Bryan of the Western District of Washington ordered that GEO pay $5.9 An additional $16.7 An additional $16.7

Immigration 188

Immigration Court Rules Contract Court 188

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 30, 2021

Here’s the Wednesday morning read: The Supreme Court will soon rule on a controversial voting-rights case. Jennifer Rubin, The Washington Post). Supreme Court Expands ICE Detention Power (César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, Crimmigration). Immigration in the Supreme Court, 2020 Term (Kevin Johnson, ImmigrationProfBlog).

Immigration 65

Immigration Court Rules Court 65

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 2, 2021

Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court Rules on Tribal Police and Immigrants’ Testimony (Adam Liptak, The New York Times). Supreme Court will not take up Johnson & Johnson challenge of $2.1 billion cancer case award (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post).

Immigration 70

Immigration Court Rules Court Decisions Court 70

JURIST

OCTOBER 4, 2022

Garland the court is again asked to examine administrative procedure, this time in the context of an immigration proceeding. Leon Santos-Zacaria is an immigrant who was removed from the US but later reentered the country. That holding was later upheld by the Board of Immigration Appeals, an administrative body.

Court 118

Court Immigration Tort Law Firms 118

HowAppealing

MARCH 27, 2024

Maria Sacchetti of The Washington Post reports that “ U.S. appeals court keeps block on Texas immigration law.” ” Elizabeth Findell of The Wall Street Journal reports that “ Appeals Court Keeps Texas Immigration Law on Pause; State plan to arrest, deport migrants faces constitutional challenge.”

Immigration 100

Immigration Government Court Legal 100

HowAppealing

JULY 22, 2022

“Supreme Court Refuses for Now to Restore Biden Plan on Immigration Enforcement; A federal judge in Texas has blocked guidelines setting priorities for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents, saying they were at odds with the immigrations laws”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Rules Court Laws 100

HowAppealing

JANUARY 22, 2024

Marimow and Nick Miroff of The Washington Post report that “ Supreme Court clears way for border agents to remove Texas wire barrier; Monday’s order was one of several recent actions by the high court that affirmed federal government authority over immigration matters.” ” David G.

Court 100

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 100

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

In his thesis, Harpster originally said this number was 1 in 5 and attributed the figure to an unpublished study by a now-dead detective and professor in Washington state. A detective in Washington state, Marty Garland, told Harpster that a young mother had called 911 in November 2018 after her infant stopped breathing in his sleep.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 5, 2024

Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court temporarily blocks new Texas immigration enforcement law (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Trump Prevails in Supreme Court Challenge to His Eligibility (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Takeaways from Trump’s Supreme Court win: He stays on ballot, but his legal peril is just starting (Nicholas Riccardi, The (..)

Immigration 101

Immigration Court Rules Court Legal 101

Above The Law

JANUARY 23, 2024

* Supreme Court rules 5-4 that Texas can't implement its own immigration policy. Washington Post ] * Florida backtracks from plan to use taxpayer funds for Trump legal defense fund after Ron DeSantis suggests he'd veto it.

Immigration 93

Immigration Manufacturing Court Rules Legal 93

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 16, 2023

16 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 90

Immigration Court Rules Court 90

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Below is my column in The Hill on the recent bills proposed in Florida and California on immigration and guns. DeSantis’s ‘tongue in cheek’ immigration relocation law. If Newsom’s bill is a middle finger to the Supreme Court, DeSantis’ bill is the same to the Biden administration. Here is the column: California Gov.

Immigration 33

Immigration Laws Court Sports 33

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

For example, New York and numerous other cities have declared themselves to be “sanctuaries” for undocumented immigrants yet, in recent months, have protested increasing transfers of such immigrants to their jurisdiction. Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University.

Immigration 42

Immigration Legal Legal Government 42

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

The federal district court for the Southern District of California rejected challenges to waivers of environmental laws granted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for certain types of border wall construction projects in San Diego County. New York City’s response to the 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) issues is due on March 30.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigating 40

HowAppealing

DECEMBER 19, 2020

“Justices Put Off Ruling on Trump Plan for Unauthorized Immigrants and Census; The Supreme Court said a challenge to efforts to exclude unauthorized immigrants from the tabulations used to allocate House seats was premature”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Court Rules Legal 100

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 28, 2021

Share The Supreme Court said Monday it will not take up a dispute over whether transgender students must be allowed to use restrooms that match their gender identities. Two new grants on immigration, free speech. An immigration judge ordered their deportation, and the Board of Immigration Appeals upheld that ruling.

Immigration 103

Immigration Court Government Work From Home 103

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 19, 2022

Share Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly expel migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. The dispute now before the Supreme Court is a separate case. immigration court.

Court 131

Court Immigration Government Litigating 131

JonathanTurley

JUNE 1, 2021

As we await important and likely divided decisions on issues like abortion, Chief Justice John Roberts and his colleagues seem to be sending a message that the Court is not so rigidly ideological as Democratic members and activists suggest. cannot be reconciled with the terms of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Court 60

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 60

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 10, 2020

Washington Supreme Court Invalidated Regulation of Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Washington Supreme Court concluded that the Washington Clean Air Act did not grant the Department of Ecology authority to regulate indirect greenhouse gas emissions of businesses and utilities whose products ultimately generate such emissions.

Court Reporting 40

Court Reporting Court Government Construction 40

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 5, 2024

In that case, a 5-3 majority ruled against a state seeking to enforce immigration laws in light of what it described as a vacuum of federal action. The court declared that the states were preempted or barred from taking such action. They have often found the courts closed to them.

Immigration 58

Immigration Court Government Laws 58

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. State of Washington ex rel. Spokane County District Court , No. Ninth Circuit Affirmed Rejection of NEPA Challenges to Immigration Policies. FEATURED CASE.

Court 40

Court Litigating Litigation Government 40

JonathanTurley

JULY 9, 2022

Below is my column in the Hill on the effort to declare an “invasion” along the Texas border to allow the state to take greater control along the border to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. Greg Abbott signed an order allowing Texas law enforcement to return illegal immigrants apprehended in the state back to the U.S.

Immigration 33

Immigration Government Court Laws 33

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 26, 2022

Her mother hails from Jamaica, while her late father was the son of Jewish immigrants from eastern Europe. After graduating from Yale in 2001, she spent a year working as an associate at Jenner & Block in Washington, D.C., Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2002 to 2003. Early life and career.

Court 115

Court Laws Lawyers Lawyer 115

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 8, 2020

However, Sally Yates is one of the most astute political operatives in Washington. Former Justice official and Harvard professor Jack Goldsmith pointed out that Yates neither determined the immigration order to be unconstitutional nor cited any basis for refusing to defend it. The order was constitutional.

Attorney 40

Attorney Drafting Legal Legal 40

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 10, 2024

Immigration has long been an area of intense policy disagreements. In my view, Biden has been dead wrong on immigration, but voters will soon have an opportunity to render a judgment on those policies in the election. If Mayorkas is violating federal law, he can be brought to court to enjoin his actions.

Misdemeanor 38

Misdemeanor Immigration Tort Laws 38

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v.

Immigration 96

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 96