Court Rules Indiana Statute 
JURIST
AUGUST 18, 2021
Indiana Court of Appeals sided with Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb on Tuesday allowing him to withdraw the state from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act benefits program. The trial court ruled in the plaintiffs’ favor and ordered the state to continue its participation in the program.
Attorney at Work
MAY 31, 2022
The statute of limitations ran out due to his forgetting the deadline. The court ordered additional briefings, but the lawyer then missed multiple deadlines, claiming earlier orders were lost among numerous notifications on his mobile phone. Most states implement rule changes in batches, two or four times per year.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 23, 2024
As enacted in 1984, the statute at issue in the case, 18 U.S.C. The case before the Court involves James Snyder, who is the former mayor of Portage, Indiana. First, the majority found that the statutory text strongly suggests that §666—like §201(b)— is a bribery statute, not a gratuities statute.
SCOTUSBlog
OCTOBER 4, 2022
McDonough , a case that the court already rescheduled seven times last term, and which involves the construction of a statute providing disability pay for members of the military. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, by a divided vote , deferred to the Department of Veterans Affairs construction of the statute under Chevron U.S.A.,
At the Lectern
APRIL 28, 2022
subdivision (c) and rule 8.392(b) of the California Rules of Court, or whether the matter should be remanded to the superior court so it may in the first instance decide whether the petition or its claims are successive under section 1509, subdivision (d), and if so whether to issue a certificate of appealability under section 1509.1,
JURIST
NOVEMBER 29, 2022
The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Monday reversed a preliminary injunction previously implemented to bar the enforcement of an Indiana law requiring fetal remains to be either buried or cremated by clinics that provide abortion. The plaintiffs contend that the mandate violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 25, 2021
.” The health care workers can refile if circumstances change or if the appellate court rules against them. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct. He cited the Supreme Court’s 1905 ruling in Jacobson v. 29, when the vaccine requirement is scheduled to go into effect.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content