Court Rules Kentucky Litigating Litigation 
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 24, 2020
There is an interesting fight brewing in Kentucky between Attorney General Daniel Cameron and Gov. Beshear has correctly cited a major victory recently before the Kentucky Supreme Court — an unanimous decision in favor of his authority to issue pandemic orders. Andy Beshear. In Beshear v.
JURIST
MARCH 21, 2022
Judge David Bunning of the District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky ruled Friday that former Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis violated the constitutional rights of same-sex couples when she denied them marriage licenses during the summer of 2015. Judge Bunning disagreed with Davis’s argument, writing: It is.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently O
MARCH 19, 2021
Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. Judge Alan Albright’s court in the Western District of Texas is rapidly becoming the latest hot spot for patent litigation. Moreover, individual court rules are now requiring greater transparency.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 11, 2024
Accordingly, both courts of appeals held that the two laws work in tandem, even if in tension, to guide the executive branch’s authority over the Oregon forest. Biden , the challengers ask the justices to grant review and reverse the lower courts’ rulings. In American Forest Resource Council v. United States and Murphy Co.
SquirePattonBoggs
MARCH 11, 2024
. § 1254(2), the lesser-known companion to the provision that gives the Supreme Court certiorari jurisdiction (§1254(1)). Certification to a State Supreme Court, this Blog has noted , is a procedure the Sixth Circuit knows well. See In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig. , Kentucky , 35 F.4th 4th 455 (6th Cir. 1254(2).
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 30, 2023
The court ruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” Kentucky v. particularly those with ravenous monkeys. 3d 599 (6th Cir.2003)
SquirePattonBoggs
MAY 13, 2022
The district court ruled otherwise, holding that the defendant “had purposefully targeted stores” across multiple states “to impede communication between law enforcement, triggering the relocation enhancement.”. 20-56174, 2022 U.S. LEXIS 12657, at *16 n.6 6 (9th Cir. May 11, 2022). Safelite Grp., 3d 429, 440 (6th Cir.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
30 
Let's personalize your content