Court Rules Laws New Mexico 
JURIST
OCTOBER 8, 2023
On Friday, New Mexico District Judge Fred T. The case was in the New Mexico County of Lea Fifth Judicial District Court. Soelen concluded that the congressional map does not violate Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution. Thus, Soelen ruled that the map is constitutional.
JURIST
DECEMBER 15, 2020
The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of New Mexico , ending the latest chapter in a decades-old water dispute involving the Pecos River. The conflict involves how water is apportioned between New Mexico and Texas under an interstate compact first approved by Congress in the mid-twentieth century.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 1, 2024
District Judge David Urias has enjoined the University of New Mexico from imposing a $5,400 security fee for former collegiate swimmer and activist Riley Gaines after speaking on campus. Now, in a significant free speech victory, U.S. The First Amendment prohibits the vesting of such unbridled discretion in a government official.”
JURIST
NOVEMBER 25, 2021
The court further concluded that the amendment also violated Article XXIII, § 2 because it should have been submitted to voters through a constitutional convention. On appeal, the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed. We are still governed by the rule of law.”
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 22, 2023
Justice Neil Gorsuch dissented, his third extensive writing in the last two weeks on Indian law matters. Gorsuch would have framed the issue before the court as a matter of applying the canons of construing Indian treaties. The post Supreme Court rules 5-4 against Navajo Nation in water rights dispute appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
SCOTUSBlog
MARCH 25, 2023
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Five years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that pleading guilty to a crime does not prevent a defendant from arguing that the law criminalizing their conduct is unconstitutional. In Herrera v.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 22, 2021
Although the decision did not involve cash payments to college athletes, it may pave the way for a future Supreme Court ruling on whether college athletes should be able to earn money for playing sports – either directly from their universities or through lucrative endorsement deals. Monday’s decision in NCAA v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
118 
Let's personalize your content