This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The NorthCarolina Supreme Court issued an order on Friday in the election protest raised by state Supreme Court candidate Jefferson Griffin. In a 4-2 decision, the ruling partially upholds and partially reverses an April 4 order entered by the state’s Court of Appeals.
The US Supreme Courtruled 8-1 Thursday in Berger v. NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP that two Republican state legislators may step in to defend the state’s voter identification law, even though the state’s Democratic attorney general is already doing so.
The NorthCarolina Supreme Court Friday granted a petition for rehearing for two settled cases. This decision comes after the election of new justices in 2022, which gave the court a 5-2 Republican majority. I am committed to fighting for the rule of law and will of the voters. Justices Michael R.
The US Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from NorthCarolina on Monday over the constitutionality of a state law allowing employers to sue employees working as undercover investigators. ” The denial from the Supreme Court offered no explanation or reasoning.
The NorthCarolinaCourt of Appeals on Friday blocked a lower court order that would restore voting rights to more than 55,000 North Carolinians on parole or probation for a felony. ” Moore said, “although this fight is far from over, [he is] confident that the Constitution will prevail in the end.”
Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in NorthCarolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. The NorthCarolina case.
Tens of thousands of people serving punishments for felony convictions in NorthCarolina but who aren’t behind bars can now register to vote and cast ballots following an appeals courtruling, reports the Associated Press. The law was struck down in March. million registered voters in NorthCarolina.
En banc Fourth Circuit affirms federal district courtruling that struck down as unconstitutional a NorthCarolina charter school rule that girls wear skirts: You can access today’s 10-to-6 en banc ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit at this link.
This week, we highlight cert petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether two groups of NorthCarolina employees were denied pay or benefits by the state in violation of a federal employment law and the Constitution. The NorthCarolina Supreme Courtruled for the employees.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon asked lawyers involved in a major election law case to weigh in on whether the court can still hear the case in the wake of a recent ruling by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court, which reversed its earlier decision in the underlying redistricting dispute that sparked the case.
A US federal court on Wednesday partially blocked enforcement of an Alabama law criminalizing absentee ballot assistance. The court sided with a coalition of plaintiffs who argued the law would violate the rights of disabled, blind, and low-literacy voters. The judge enjoined several sections of Senate Bill 1 (SB1).
Marisa Wright is a US national staff correspondent for JURIST, and a 2L at Harvard Law School. . Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next Monday in a case that could have major implications for racial equality and college admissions. If the Courtrules as expected, it will have major cascading effects for racial equality.
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a NorthCarolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
The decision came in the case of outgoing Republican congressman Madison Cawthorn who, before losing his House primary this month, faced a challenge from NorthCarolina voters arguing that his actions around the Jan. 6 Capitol attack made him ineligible for future public service.
Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Wednesday in a case that UCLA law professor Richard Hasen has called the “ 800-pound gorilla ” of election law. NorthCarolina and the original challengers to the Republican map offer a different interpretation of the text of the elections clause.
How many of the lawyers out there liked hypotheticals in law school? So, for those of you who enjoy hypotheticals, here it is: Company A, a NorthCarolina LLC, owns four patents. Company B has the same corporate address in NorthCarolina and the same five shareholders as Company A.
Share Two years after the courtruled that a disparity in bankrupt debtors’ fees between judicial districts was impermissible, the justices on Friday ruled 6-3 that charging equal fees going forward is an adequate remedy for that disparity. By statute, the U.S.
Judges and authorities have made social media a “First Amendment-free zone” where people — particularly students — face outsize repercussions for contextless and humorous statements, LoMonte wrote in a recently posted University of Memphis Law Review article. NorthCarolina.
This story was republished from NC Newsline , a nonpartisan nonprofit news organization in NorthCarolina. The NorthCarolinaCourt of Appeals issued a ruling Tuesday that a man should not lose his parental rights because of strict parole conditions imposed by another state. Read the original story here.
QUESTION: I’m a solo practitioner with a general practice handling everything from real estate transactions to family law. Laws, rules, regulations, and opinions vary by jurisdiction. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. 91-2 & Formal Advisory Opinion No.
However, there is a new ruling out of NorthCarolina that could present another opportunity for the Court to revisit the issue. District Court for the Middle District of NorthCarolina just ruled that UNC can use race criteria to guarantee a “critical mass” of minority students in its classes. .”
Last summer, the Supreme Courtruled in Siegel v. Fitzgerald that a 2017 law permitting debtors in bankruptcy proceedings in NorthCarolina and Alabama to pay lower administrative fees than those paid by debtors in other states violated the Constitution’s requirement that Congress provide uniform bankruptcy laws nationwide.
Share In a major election-law decision, the Supreme Courtruled on Tuesday that although the Constitution gives state legislatures the power to regulate federal elections, state courts can supervise the legislature’s exercise of that power. Roberts agreed that the court did have the power to decide the case on the merits.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday issued orders from its so-called “long conference” – the justices’ private conference in the last week of September, at which they met for the first time since the end of June to add new cases to their docket. After the California Supreme Court declined to weigh in, Sheetz came to the U.S.
Last June, the Supreme Court invalidated the undergraduate admissions programs at Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina, holding that they violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by explicitly considering applicants’ race. The justices will be reconsidering three cert petitions for the first time.
University of NorthCarolina. Here is the column: Forty-four years ago, the Supreme Court was the center of a raging protest by thousands as the justices took up the case of Regents of the University of California v. In Bakke, the courtruled against affirmative action in a fractured decision. In Gratz v.
The question presented was whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the U.S. state whose law is displaced. LLC (Raiders) is a company organized under the laws of Pennsylvania.
“American citizens lack the ability to make even the most cursory inquiry into whether their prosecutors operate within the rules,” the report asserted. million judicial opinions published between 2000 and 2016 by federal and state courts in Pennsylvania. Adopt American Bar Association Rules for Defining Prosecutorial Misconduct.
In 2014, a University of NorthCarolina professor found that as many as ten percent of the school’s football and basketball players could not read above a third-grade level. What was most striking in the Alston case was the open skepticism over the role of the NCAA in comparison to the last major review from the Court.
The US Supreme Courtruled Tuesday in Moore v. The theory stipulates that state legislatures retain exclusive authority over the administration of elections; therefore, state courts are not allowed to intervene, even if the law in question violates the state constitution.
Share In 2003, a divided Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that the University of Michigan Law School could consider race in its admissions process as part of its efforts to assemble a diverse student body. Ryan Park argues for the University of NorthCarolina. William Hennessy).
From all of us at Diaz Trade Law, we are immensely grateful for your support this year. After Diaz Trade Law filed a successful petition, CBP mitigated the penalty down to $5,000.00, saving our client $807,500.00. Diaz Trade Law (DTL) sent CBP a petition requesting relief and CBP decided to mitigated the penalty to $13,200.00.
Share Lawyers involved in a major election law case disagreed on Monday about whether the Supreme Court has the power to reach a decision in the case. The NorthCarolina Supreme Court’s decision on rehearing will not change either of those decisions, the legislators say.
Although some justices appeared receptive to that theory during nearly three hours of argument, it was not clear that there was a majority to endorse it, even as other justices focused on a narrower version of the theory that would preserve at least some role for state courts in enforcing state laws or the state constitution.
Share The lawyers involved in a major election law case once again disagreed on Thursday about whether the Supreme Court has the power to reach a decision in the case in light of a ruling last month by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court in the underlying dispute.
Share In 2003, the Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. The challengers urge the justices to rule that the Constitution and federal civil rights laws bar any consideration of race in college admissions. The two universities being challenged are Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina.
A tragedy in NorthCarolina could present rather difficult torts questions in a wrongful death case for a grieving family. While I am not a NorthCarolina lawyer, the state does not appear ideal for plaintiffs in this type of action and the facts of the case could present other difficulties. Disclaimer.
He first started sketching Supreme Court arguments in the 1977-78 term, when Regents of the University of California v. I would like to prevail on him to go one more term and have some symmetry by sketching the Harvard and University of NorthCarolina affirmative-action cases, but it seems that his mind is made up.
The injuries in Clendening were not the sort of combat-related or even job-related injuries one would expect: petitioner Carol Clendening seeks to recover for her late husband’s exposure to toxic drinking water while serving as a judge advocate general officer at Camp Lejeune, NorthCarolina. territories.
Russell Covey, a professor at Georgia State University College of Law who has studied plea bargaining, has outlined how this sentence “ceiling” tied to the best plea offer could work in practice. Similarly, University of Chicago Law Professor John Rappaport has broached the idea of simpler versions of trials (i.e., In fact, the U.S.
University of NorthCarolina, which are poised to determine the role of affirmative action in college admissions. The primary issue in both cases is whether the Court should reverse its decision in Grutter v. Decisions in all of the cases are expected before the Court’s term ends in June. Harvard College and SFFA v.
In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, NorthCarolina. The trial courtruled that “Dr. Steege did not meet the locality rule outlined in Shipley v. Code Ann. § 26-26-115(b). Williams , 350 S.W.3d 3d 527 (Tenn. 2011),” and accordingly excluded his testimony.
Although Virginia allows any mistaken information to be corrected (and also allows for challenged voters to file provisional ballots), lower courts ordered Virginia to enable people to vote who had said they were not citizens. We also have the same controversies arising in this election about changes to voting laws just before the election.
In so many words, the circuit courts can certify to the Supreme Court “a question or proposition of law on which it seeks instruction,” thus inviting the Court to resolve the discrete issue or simply grant certiorari before judgment. University of NorthCarolina , No. 4th 455 (6th Cir.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content