Remove Court Rules Remove Laws Remove Pennsylvania
article thumbnail

Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules incorrectly dated mail-in ballots cannot be counted

JURIST

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Monday that mail-in ballots with missing or incorrect dates will not be counted in the 2024 general election. The court instructed all 67 county election offices to uniformly implement the date requirement.

article thumbnail

Pennsylvania federal court rules election official should count undated mail-in ballots

JURIST

A federal court in Pennsylvania ruled that undated mail-in ballots must be counted in a Monday decision that could significantly influence future elections in the state. This means the court decided the case on plaintiffs’ first claim.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Pennsylvania top court rules for gas drilling firms in antitrust lawsuit

JURIST

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the attorney general’s office does not have authority under the consumer protection law to sue natural gas exploration firms over their leasing practices. Therefore, the defendants asserted that they were not subject to action under the UTPCPL.

article thumbnail

Pennsylvania court rejects challenge to mail-in voting law

JURIST

A Pennsylvania state court rejected Tuesday a challenge to Act 77 , a law that amended the state’s Election Code to expand mail-in voting options. However, the Commonwealth Court was unconvinced by the challenge. The post Pennsylvania court rejects challenge to mail-in voting law appeared first on JURIST - News.

Laws 197
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court blocks Pennsylvania county from counting mail-in ballots amid Senate primary legal battle

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Tuesday issued an order temporarily blocking the counting of some Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that do not have a handwritten date on their declaration forms. While the immediate impact of the Court’s order is unknown, it could affect each ballot’s individual validity.

Legal 219
article thumbnail

“Superior Court Gives Cold Reception to Popular Argument Against Pa.’s Consent by Registration Law; The court held that the defendant failed to identify any binding case law demonstrating grounds for such differing opinions; ‘While it is true enough that Justice Alito’s concurrence provides a window into the workings of that jurist’s mind,’ the court ruled, ‘concurring opinions have no legal effect and, therefore, are not binding on any court’”

HowAppealing

“Superior Court Gives Cold Reception to Popular Argument Against Pa.’s

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court allows Pennsylvania election officials to count undated mail-in ballots

JURIST

The US Supreme Court Thursday rejected an emergency appeal that would have prevented the counting of 257 mail-in votes in an election for a Pennsylvania judgeship. The votes, which could tip the scale in the election, are contested on the grounds that their envelopes were not dated in violation of state election law.

Court 197