This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday gave a Maryland prison official another chance to defend himself against a federal civil rights claim. Last week’s unanimous ruling in Dupree v. As a result, she agreed, some lawyers may err on the side of filing a post-trial motion to renew their arguments “out of an abundance of caution.”
United States , the Supreme Court identified one scenario in which jury instructions were not sufficient: when a non-testifying defendant’s confession to police incriminates a codefendant. While ostensibly standing behind these precedents, the Supreme Courtruled today that all that was missing from Gray was slightly more robust redaction.
But the lower courtsruled, and the federal government contends, that the “safety value” is only available to defendants who do not have any of the indicators. He argues that the “safety valve” therefore applies because he has two of the “indicators” that can disqualify someone from relief, but not all three.
Chevron transferred – the technical term is “removed” – the case to federal district court in Maryland, a move allowed by federal law. Representing the oil and gas companies, lawyer Kannon Shanmugam told the justices that 28 U.S.C. What do we say to that, he asked at one point?
Weve prepared this guide to 2025 court holidays as a go-to resource to help you proactively mark critical dates in your calendar to ensure that youre always one step ahead of the clock. This is why, again, its vital to always check the applicable federal and local courtrules when calculating your filing deadline dates.
That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, courtrules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches. What we do know comes mostly from self-reporting, industry reports, and journalists. ” Amer.
NLRB lawyers are arguing that Whole Foods must allow workers to wear “Black Lives Matter” masks at work, suggesting — in effect — that Bezos should start with the worker and work forward by allowing them to advocate for social change. That, of course, could change — the minute an NLRB lawyer shows up wearing a MAGA hat.
Glossip asked an Oklahoma court to set aside his conviction and sentence last year. In January 2023, he said, he had received for the first time files from the state indicating that prosecutors knew, but had not disclosed to Glossip or his lawyers, that Sneed had been prescribed lithium for bipolar disorder after his arrest.
After a group of federal judges had recommended that an attorney who had represented her in other ADA cases be suspended from practicing law in Maryland because of repeated ethics violations, she explained, she had voluntarily dismissed her case in the district court and cannot refile it. He argued that she does not.
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday evening largely left in place an order by a federal judge in Maryland directing the government to return to the United States a Maryland man who is currently being held in a maximum-security prison in El Salvador as a result of what the Trump administration concedes was an administrative error.
It is important to note that Republicans have also had courtsrule against them in states like North Carolina and Pennsylvania). The court found that, in their 2021 Congressional Plan, the Democrats not only violated Maryland law but the state constitution’s equal protection, free speech and free elections clauses.
* Trump administration refusal to honor 9-0 Supreme Courtruling to facilitate the release from custody of a Maryland man mistakenly deported becomes gravest crisis for federal judiciary since the apocryphal “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it” moment. [ That’s… not legal.
Nearly a half-century ago, the Supreme Courtruled unanimously that a trial court infringed on a defendants Sixth Amendment right to be represented by an attorney when it prohibited him from meeting with his lawyer during an overnight break in his testimony.
However, not surprisingly in our age of rage, there has been a slew of defamation claims raised from leading lawyers to universities to academics to police officers to the Dominion company to Sarah Palin to Jerry Falwell Jr. to Roy Moore to Joy Reid. well, you get the idea. The Lincoln Project is the latest example. In New York Times v.
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) authorization of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from three facilities in Louisiana, Maryland, and Texas. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S. In an unpublished decision, the D.C.
The lawyer who holds that job, which is sometimes known as the “political deputy,” is normally the only deputy in the solicitor general’s office who is not a career civil servant (and the only other political appointee, beyond the solicitor general, in the office). solicitor general.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization , a challenge to a Mississippi law that bans almost all abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy, that a majority of the court was ready and willing to roll back abortion rights. And when the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case on June 23, Roberts was on board.
Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. ” __ Another case in the court is a cautionary tale about those creating their own haunted houses. Maryland v. Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Janik (2009) Sgt.
However, there has been little pushback from a host of lawyers who have spent months calling for sanctions against Republican lawyers for filing lawsuits viewed legally or factually meritless. The question is whether it states just enough to avoid sanctions and whether the Trump team wants to seek such sanctions under Rule 11.
That was followed by another blistering decision striking down the Democratic plan for Maryland as “ extreme partisan gerrymandering.” ” Now an appellate court has also found that Democrats were trying to rig the next election and the five-judge panel ruled against the plan.
Becerra – are challenges to regulations issued by the Trump administration in 2019 that barred clinics that receive family-planning funds from providing abortion referrals – the so-called “gag rule.” The justices also asked the federal government for its views in Volkswagen Group v.
But in these cases, the Trump administration did not file a petition for review; instead, it filed emergency applications to partly block the orders issued by district courts in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington. There are three cases, which the court will hear consolidated as one on Thursday: Trump v. Solicitor General D.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. Maryland Appellate Court Affirmed Ruling for Baltimore in Case Seeking Correspondence and Agreements Related to City’s Climate Case. July 8, 2021).
In a December 2020 letter, during his presidential transition, he asked Democratic senators to recommend public defenders and civil rights lawyers, who have generally been underrepresented on the federal bench, for judgeships. Circuit enjoyed support from lawyers of all ideological stripes. But in Boy Scouts of America v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content