This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon asked lawyers involved in a major election law case to weigh in on whether the court can still hear the case in the wake of a recent ruling by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court, which reversed its earlier decision in the underlying redistricting dispute that sparked the case.
The Court originally consolidated two lawsuits to make up this case: one against Harvard College’s admissions process for discrimination against Asian applicants and another against the University of NorthCarolina for using socioeconomic factors, allegedly incorporating race, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Lawyer flat fee billing can be tricky. ANSWER: While most lawyers and clients are accustomed to the traditional billable hour, other pricing options do exist. Table of contents What Are Lawyer Flat Fees? The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal Resources About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism.
How many of the lawyers out there liked hypotheticals in law school? So, for those of you who enjoy hypotheticals, here it is: Company A, a NorthCarolina LLC, owns four patents. Company B has the same corporate address in NorthCarolina and the same five shareholders as Company A.
Share In 2003, a divided Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. But during nearly five hours of oral arguments on Monday, the court’s conservative majority signaled that it could be ready now, 19 years after Grutter , to end the use of race in college admissions. Brown , diversity goals, and an “endpoint in sight”.
Share The lawyers involved in a major election law case once again disagreed on Thursday about whether the Supreme Court has the power to reach a decision in the case in light of a ruling last month by the NorthCarolina Supreme Court in the underlying dispute.
Share Lawyers involved in a major election law case disagreed on Monday about whether the Supreme Court has the power to reach a decision in the case. Lawyers for one group of challengers, Common Cause, agreed, while other challengers urged the justices to dismiss the case. In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v.
Harper arose from a challenge to a new congressional map adopted by NorthCarolina’s Republican-controlled legislature in early November 2021. The NorthCarolina Supreme Court struck down the map after finding that it was a partisan gerrymander in violation of the NorthCarolina constitution.
& Chinese Companies Fined $2.5 And Xinjiang Zhongtai Chemical Co. to the UFLPA Entity List , June 2023 A New Era in Cosmetics Regulation: The Modernization of Cosmetic Regulations Act , May 2023 Can A False Claims Act Qui Tam Case, Alleging Customs Fraud, Be Filed And Pursued Anonymously?,
Share In 2003, the Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. The two universities being challenged are Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina. SFFA came to the Supreme Court in February 2021, asking the justices to review the 1st Circuit’s ruling. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit to weigh in.
A tragedy in NorthCarolina could present rather difficult torts questions in a wrongful death case for a grieving family. While I am not a NorthCarolinalawyer, the state does not appear ideal for plaintiffs in this type of action and the facts of the case could present other difficulties.
A National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers report , for example, found that the average sentence for fraud defendants who went to trial in 2015 was three times higher than the sentence for those who pleaded guilty; for defendants charged with burglary and embezzlement, the sentence at trial was almost eight times higher.
He first started sketching Supreme Court arguments in the 1977-78 term, when Regents of the University of California v. I would like to prevail on him to go one more term and have some symmetry by sketching the Harvard and University of NorthCarolina affirmative-action cases, but it seems that his mind is made up.
In her initial expert disclosures, plaintiff identified Dr. Steege from Chapel Hill, NorthCarolina. The trial courtruled that “Dr. Steege did not meet the locality rule outlined in Shipley v. Code Ann. § 26-26-115(b). Williams , 350 S.W.3d 3d 527 (Tenn. 2011),” and accordingly excluded his testimony.
While I remain hopeful that the courts have gotten a head start on addressing many issues, there is a virtual army of lawyers in place from both major parties waiting for a green light to deploy. As the voting margin shrinks between the parties, the number of lawyers increases. Jamie Raskin (D.,
Some of us immediately noted that Biden’s exclusionary criteria have been declared unconstitutional or unlawful by the court for schools and businesses; they also are unprecedented , unnecessary , and unfair to potential nominees. For decades, the court has left this issue a muddle of conflicting and vague 5-4 rulings.
On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to review a potentially blockbuster religion clause case in Oklahoma Charter School Board v. While the lawyers representing St. The lower courtruled that such funding of a religious school is unconstitutional. Here is the lower court decision: St. However, there is a catch.
The justices did not act on several high-profile petitions that they considered last week, including a challenge to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health-care workers and a NorthCarolina case asking the justices to weigh in on the election-law doctrine known as the “independent state legislature” theory. But the U.S.
It is important to note that Republicans have also had courtsrule against them in states like NorthCarolina and Pennsylvania). New York Times reporter Ken Vogel said at the time that Clinton lawyer Marc Elias, with the law firm of Perkins Coie, denied involvement in the anti-Trump dossier.
A government lawyer who argued at the Supreme Court more than anyone else in the 20th century. As the year comes to a close, SCOTUSblog looks back at some of the individuals who died in 2020 after living lives that brought them – at different times and for different reasons – to the Supreme Court of the United States.
AP ] * After ruling that boneless chicken can have bones , Ohio Supreme Courtrules that big pharmaceutical companies selling a dangerous product isn't a product liability claim. Law.com ] * Firm institutes "choose your own billable target" policy that offers tiered bonuses depending on what lawyers declare.
Encountering barriers as a young female lawyer In September 1946, then 16-year-old Sandra Day enrolled at Stanford. She stayed there until 1954, when she moved to Germany with her husband, who served as an Army lawyer. In Germany, O’Connor worked as a civilian lawyer for the Army Quartermaster Corps.
However, in 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.) In 2021 federal Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that it would have been absurd for the Archivist to disregard the deadline and unilaterally add the unratified amendment to the Constitution.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content