Remove Court Rules Remove Lawyers Remove Tort
article thumbnail

Three Supreme Court cases lead to California Lawyer of the Year honors

At the Lectern

The Daily Journal today named the recipients of its annual California Lawyer of the Year award. Three of the cases resulted in Supreme Court opinions. One of the three CLAY award Supreme Court decisions is Guardianship of Saul H. 5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Court rules.”

Lawyers 81
article thumbnail

Dismissal partially reversed based on fraudulent concealment.

Day on Torts

The tort claims in this case were subject to the three-year statute of limitations applicable to injuries to real property, and the Court of Appeals agreed that this limitations period would not be tolled by the discovery rule under the facts here. This opinion was released three months after the case was assigned on briefs.

Tort 59
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Summary judgment for defendants in premises liability case affirmed

Day on Torts

The Court noted that plaintiff’s only evidence that the cap was dangerous was the evidence of her own fall and the fall of the alleged other unnamed homeowner, and that “[n]egligence cannot be presumed by the mere happening of an injury or accident.” internal citation omitted). This opinion was released 1.5

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Scaffolding rental company owed no duty to roofer where homeowner opted to install scaffolding himself.

Day on Torts

After discovery, DSS filed a motion for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The trial court ruled that plaintiff had asserted a premises liability claim, and that “DSS did not owe Plaintiff a duty of care under premises liability.” Plaintiff then amended his complaint to assert claims against DSS as well.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Wrong defendants in certificate of good faith caption should have resulted in dismissal.

Day on Torts

The Court continued its analysis by pointing out that one of its prior decisions supported dismissal in this case. 3, 2019), the Court ruled that “language in a complaint cannot substitute for a proper certificate of good faith.” In Dotson v. State , No. E2019-00325-COA-R9-CV (Tenn. internal citations omitted).

Tort 59
article thumbnail

$1.5M Verdict Affirmed in Tennessee Car Wreck Case.

Day on Torts

Regarding the permanence of plaintiff’s injury, the Court found that plaintiffs’ experts had testified to some permanence for both his leg and back and his cognitive injuries, and that the medical testimony was “corroborated by [plaintiffs’] respective testimony that [plaintiff’s] physical and cognitive symptoms have not improved since the accident.”

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Dismissal of Defamation and False Light Claim under Tennessee Public Participation Act partially reversed.

Day on Torts

If a party petitions for dismissal under the TPPA and “makes a prima facie case that they have participated in a protected activity under the TPPA, the court may then dismiss the action against them, unless the responding party establishes a prima facie case for each essential element of the claim in the legal action.”