This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Courtruled on Friday that a unanimous jury is required to apply a recidivism punishment under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. The court held that a jury must unanimously find that the qualifying convictions were from separate occurrences for the mandatory minimum to apply.
A UK High Courtruled Monday that a ban on puberty blockers issued in May 2024 in the UK was lawful. TransActual condemned the court’s decision to uphold the ban. ” The post UK High Courtrules ban on puberty blockers is lawful appeared first on JURIST - News. risks and no or very limited clear benefits.”
As a litigation paralegal, you need to be good at finding the relevant courtrule quickly. I would go back to my office and spend far too long trying to find the relevant courtrule. Back then, there was no such thing as Google or online courtrules. This one is based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Courtruled Tuesday that Article 1, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution offers greater protection to citizens from warrantless searches of their vehicles than does the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Thanks for your support! DONATE NOW.
The UK High Courtruled Friday that the Government’s climate strategy is inadequate and therefore violates the UK Climate Change Act 2008. The ruling comes nearly two years after a previous High Court judgment ordered the Government to strengthen its net zero strategy to bring it in line with the Climate Change Act.
.” The Court found that it could not allow incredibly difficult logistics to give license to Immigration Judges to skirt their responsibilities. The court remanded the case to the judge to reconsider Valarezo-Tirados’s petition.
Because the wind power development would “have a significant adverse effect” on the practice of herding on the Fosen peninsula, the Supreme Courtruled that the license would violate the ICCPR unless substantial remedies were implemented.
The post Federal courtrules Artificial Intelligence cannot be an ‘inventor’ under US patent law appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Based on these two conclusions, the court affirmed the district court’s order denying Uber’s motion to compel arbitration. The post Federal appeals courtrules Uber cannot force arbitration of disability discrimination claims appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
The US Supreme Courtruled 5-4 Wednesday that Texas does not have the authority to regulate gaming on the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo reservation in El Paso, Texas. The post US Supreme Courtrules Texas may not regulate legal gambling on Native American reservation appeared first on JURIST - News.
Poland’s constitutional courtruled on Thursday that some parts of EU law are not compatible with the Polish constitution and declared that the constitution supersedes EU laws, setting off a legal crisis within the EU. The primacy of EU law must be undisputed.
With regards to the request for expungement of the Madras High Court’s remarks, the court clarified that since such remarks were made orally, they are not a part of the official judicial record and hence the question of expungement does not arise.
He further ordered that the Australian government pay Djokovic’s legal fees. However, both his affidavit and an official transcript of the border interview indicate that the agents were unsatisfied with that exemption, and chose to cancel his visa and detain him without giving him proper access to his legal counsel.
The US Supreme Courtruled then that under the Fourth Amendment, police must have a warrant in order to obtain cell-site location information from wireless carrier’s databases. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania distinguished Carpenter from Dunkins. United States.
The judgment means that Los Angeles County will not be legally required to house homeless people in Skid Row. A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously decided Thursday that the decision of Judge David Carter, who oversaw the case in April 2020 , failed to follow legal requirements.
The US Department of Justice filed an appeal on Friday with the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit challenging a lower courtruling in July blocking new applications to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
The UK Supreme Court held Thursday that Surrey’s planning authorities acted unlawfully when granting planning permission for an oil well development in 2019. The courtruled that the authorities should have considered certain environmental impacts when making the decision.
The post Malawi Supreme Courtrules death penalty unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. Malawi is the 22nd country in sub-Saharan Africa to abolish the death penalty, following Chad’s abolition of capital punishment for all crimes last May.
The US Supreme Courtruled in a 6-3 opinion Thursday that mistakes of law—and not only mistakes of fact—could protect parties from losing their copyrights on grounds of inaccurate registration. The post US Supreme Courtrules mistakes of law can excuse copyright registration inaccuracies appeared first on JURIST - News.
The Court of Justice of the European Union Thursday held that Lithuanian law ordering the automatic detention of asylum seekers was inconsistent with EU law. Ultimately, the court found that this law was in breach of article 6.
In April 2020, the Supreme Courtruled in Ramos that defendants on trial in state courts must be convicted by a unanimous jury under the Sixth Amendment, which is incorporated to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. In Edward v.
Civil asset forfeiture does not require that the owner of the property actually be charged or convicted of a crime, and in most cases the standard for seizure is much lower than the traditional “beyond a reasonable doubt” criminal legal standard of proof.
The UK’s High Cout of Justice on Tuesday ruled that recent amendments to protest laws enacted by the Secretary of State were unlawful. The court’s judgment comes as a result of a legal challenge to the amendments brought by the National Council of Civil Liberties.
However, the court found the 2021 reform conflicted with Article 103 of the Basic Law. The majority stated the purpose of the law is to “ensure legal certainty” and guarantee German citizens protection from criminal double jeopardy.
The post California courtrules gig worker initiative unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. For two years, drivers have been saying that democracy cannot be bought. And today’s decision shows they were right.”.
The post Germany top courtrules Berlin rent cap is unconstitutional appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary. Landlords and property investment firms, however, have criticized the law for interfering with the housing market and policy.
The decision shares similarities with a Dutch decision in 2019 where the Dutch High Court stated that the government’s response to climate change fell short of the standards necessary to protect the citizenry from threats to their lives and wellbeing that climate change gives rise to.
The US Supreme Courtruled 8-1 Monday in Uzuegbunam v. The courtruled that Article 3 standing’s redressability element is satisfied if the plaintiffs’ claim is based on a completed violation of a legal right. Further, according to the court, nominal damages by themselves can redress a past injury.
Sections 2 and 179 of the UPDF Act, subjecting civilians to military law and triable by military courts, were found in contravention of articles 28(1) and 44(c) of the Constitution. This was because these courts were neither independent nor impartial.
The UK Supreme Courtruled Wednesday that part of the UK’s trade union laws are incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The Supreme Court disagreed with this. UNISON, whose legal team represented Mercer in court, celebrated the success of the case.
The US Supreme Courtruled unanimously Monday against a non-US citizen who was contesting his indictment for unlawful re-entry into the country. The district court dismissed the indictment, and that finding was affirmed upon appeal to the Ninth Circuit. .'” The case, US v.
While lower courts had ruled in favor of Facebook, the Federal Court reversed those rulings, determining that the company’s community standards policy violated the users’ right to free expression.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Courtruled Wednesday that the attorney general’s office does not have authority under the consumer protection law to sue natural gas exploration firms over their leasing practices. Therefore, the defendants asserted that they were not subject to action under the UTPCPL.
The Indian Supreme Courtruled on Wednesday that women can sit for the NDA (National Defence Academy) admission exam in a landmark interim order which will allow more women to serve in India’s armed forces.
The Hungarian Constitutional Courtruled against a petition from Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s government Friday, seeking to challenge a ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union that held Hungary’s asylum policies broke European law.
A federal court in Pennsylvania ruled that undated mail-in ballots must be counted in a Monday decision that could significantly influence future elections in the state. The ruling comes from NAACP v. ” Nevertheless, the court chose not to proceed with this claim.
In a statement the president of the judicial body, Francisco Morales Saravia, commented that “the rulings of the Constitutional Court must be followed and complied with, just like resolutions of the Supreme Court” referring to earlier actions by the Peruvian Supreme Court in the case.
The ruling comes after the Virginia General Assembly approved a law last year that allows localities to remove war memorials. The post Virginia highest courtrules city can remove two Confederate statues appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a bill into law Wednesday night shielding in vitro fertilization (IVF) providers from legal liability, moments after it was passed by the legislature. The new law protects IVF providers from some civil lawsuits and criminal prosecutions.
The Supreme Courtruled 5-3 on Thursday that a Fourth Amendment seizure occurred when police shot a woman, Roxanne Torres, in the back as she fled because the police used physical force with intent to restrain. The majority emphasized that the ruling is narrow. Torres kept driving, successfully fleeing the scene.
Asylum Aid, a leading UK charity providing free legal advice and representation to asylum seekers and refugees, announced on Friday that it was launching legal action against the Home Office’s Safety of Rwanda plan to “ensure that all individual cases against removal to Rwanda are properly considered.”
However, the lower courtruled in favor of the officer, finding that the officer had probable cause. The Supreme Court’s opinion, delivered by Justice Elena Kagan, vacated and remanded the lower court’s decision, holding that “the flight of a suspected misdemeanant does not always justify entry into a home.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content