This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Supreme Court held Monday that individuals whose convictions became final before Ramos v. Louisiana , holding that jury verdicts in criminal trials must be unanimous under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, do not receive the advantages of jury unanimity on federal collateral review. In Edward v.
“Louisiana State Bar violated lawyers’ free speech rights, appeals courtrules”: Daniel Wiessner of Reuters has this report. Bernie Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law reports that “ Louisiana Lawyer’s Rights Violated by Wellness, LGBTQ+ Posts.” Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.
The US Supreme Court declined Monday to take up an appeal by a group of oil companies challenging a California state courtruling permitting two California cities to sue for damages related to climate change, meaning the case will be heard in state court.
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday in Jones v. Jones argued that under two of the court’s recent decisions, 2012’s Miller v. Jones argued that under two of the court’s recent decisions, 2012’s Miller v. The court’s six conservative justices disagreed.
“Domestic Abusers Have Gun Rights Too, US Appeals CourtRules; Court vacates conviction of Texas man tied to five shootings; Ruling is latest fallout from US Supreme Court landmark ruling”: Erik Larson of Bloomberg News has this report. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.
The Oklahoma Supreme Courtruled Tuesday that the creation of a publicly-funded religious charter school, S t. The court said the St. ” The state’s Charter School Board would have provided oversight of performance and legal compliance. ” This is binding on state through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Louisiana , the Supreme Courtruled that states could only convict defendants of serious offenses with a unanimous jury verdict. Some of these communications included both the firm’s legal advice about planning for tax consequences of expatriation and non-legal advice about preparing tax returns. In Ramos v.
The decision follows multiple previous precedents set by the Court over the past decade that sharply limited courts’ ability to sentence a juvenile offender to life in prison without parole, the lawyers wrote. The court is fooling no one,”” Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissent. In Miller v.
The conflict of interest contravenes a number of provisions in the Louisiana Code of Judicial Conduct , including Canon 1 requiring judges to uphold the independence and integrity of the court system. It also contravened Canon 2 in failing to “avoid Impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities.”
Before filing suit, plaintiff consulted with a friend who was an attorney in Louisiana. Based on this legal standard, the Court of Appeals agreed that plaintiff did not comply with the HCLA pre-suit notice requirements here. Plaintiff thereafter filed this HCLA suit. internal citations omitted).
The Second Circuit agreed with the district court that the plaintiff lacked standing because he failed to allege an injury in fact since he “never explained why he had any legal right to have the document distributed.” Federal Court in Washington Upheld Forest Restoration Plan. EPA’s brief is due December 15. Williams , No.
His case ended up before the Supreme Court, which issued a 7–2 decision against Scott. ” The Court held that black men and women, free or slaves, were not American citizens. The Louisiana Supreme Court refused to throw out the charge against Plessy, his case ended up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Louisiana that have raised doubts about imposing the death sentence for crimes such as rape. In 1977, the Supreme Courtruled that imposing the death penalty for rape was cruel and unusual punishment. Georgia , Coker v. Georgia and Kennedy v. Between 1908 and 1951, all 45 prisoners executed for rape in Virginia were Black men.
Share This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider, among other things, a capital defendant’s request for habeas relief on the ground that his lawyer conceded guilt over his objection, as in 2018’s McCoy v. After McCoy , Tyler unsuccessfully sought relief in Louisiana state courts. In Tyler v.
Perhaps they also stand as a microcosm of the diversity of work-from-home environments in which so many members of the legal community have found themselves this year. 10, the courtruled unanimously in favor his clients. “I Lien sketched Louisiana Solicitor General Elizabeth Murrill, who faced off against Bélanger in Edwards v.
Alabama is one of 23 states , including Louisiana and Texas , that have enacted laws criminalizing gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Some states, such as Florida, have attempted to prohibit the use of personal pronouns in certain public school contexts, and Ohio has also prohibited transgender participation in sports.
The government argues that although enablement inquiry requires some factual findings, it also includes questions of law, and the Federal Circuit properly set aside a jury verdict favoring Amgen on legal grounds. Louisiana , 21-993. relisted after the Oct. 28 conference). Returning Relists.
Louisiana , the Supreme Court overruled precedent from the 1970s upholding nonunanimous verdicts in criminal cases. The court there wrote that the Constitution provides a defendant the “right to demand that his liberty should not be taken from him except by … the unanimous verdict of a jury of twelve persons.”
According to the Espy File and DPIC , there have been more than 16,000 people in colonial and post-colonial America executed in a legal process since 1608. Supreme Courtruled that a prisoner challenging an existing method of execution under the Eighth Amendment must propose a viable alternative method. . This past June the U.S.
Can an officer legally, not follow an order from her superior? Many legal cases exist documenting public servants (namely police officers) and when they can and cannot disobey a superior or an administrative (e.g., and around the world) often seem and in many cases do follow any legal order given. (and
Timeline Post Conviction The following is a timeline of the post-conviction events that have taken place in the Syed case: In May 2010, Syed filed a post-conviction application with nine claims challenging the legality of his conviction in the Baltimore trial court.
In a major victory for the Biden administration, the Supreme Court on Friday ruled that Texas and Louisiana do not have a legal right, known as standing, to challenge a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation.
But that hasn’t stopped some from promoting his methods and even deploying 911 call analysis in court to win convictions. In 2016, Missouri prosecutor Leah Askey wrote Harpster an effusive email, bluntly detailing how she skirted legalrules to exploit his methods against unwitting defendants. “Of I was wrong.
The US Supreme Court temporarily stayed on Thursday a lower courtruling which would have restricted the Biden administration’s ability to encourage social media platforms to remove content it considers misleading.
Share The Supreme Court on Monday set the stage for a major ruling next year on abortion – one that could upend the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Roe v. Casey , in which the courtruled that the Constitution protects the right to have an abortion before a fetus becomes viable. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.
Last May, in an ongoing legal challenge to Becton’s authority first filed in 2020, five white female prosecutors — Mary Knox, Alison Chandler, Mary Blumberg, Rachel Piersig and Jill Henderson — filed a federal lawsuit against Contra Costa County and its DA’s office. Photo via Wikimedia Commons.
Share With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Supreme Court on Thursday put the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers on hold, while litigation over its legality continues in the lower courts. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Friday invalidated a Mississippi election law that allowed mail-in and absentee election ballots as long as they were sent on or before Election Day. The ruling overturned the lower court’s decision that upheld the law.
Even as Americans anticipate a Supreme Courtruling striking down Roe v. We can expect things to get worse if the Courtrules as t he leak this week suggested it will. Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. The case of Lizette Herrera, a 26-year-old South Texas woman, is already well known. If the U.S.
. & Nnamdi Egwuonwu, NBC News) Louisiana’s nitrogen gas execution back on for next week, federal appeals courtrules (Andrea Gallo, Meghan Friedmann, John Simerman, & Joseph Cranney, The Times-Picayune of New Orleans) How Amy Coney Barretts close friendship could affect the future of this major supreme court case (Linda Jacobson, The (..)
That changed this week, with announcements from different parts of the federal bureaucracy aimed at supporting and protecting reproductive health in the new landscape created by the Supreme Courtruling that overturned Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood. For legal authority, HHS is relying on the ??1986
As both a government lawyer and in private practice, Douglas Huron spent his legal career advocating on behalf of workers. In that case, Ann Hopkins was denied a promotion because she was perceived as “pushy” and “too macho,” and the Supreme Courtruled in 1989 that the company’s actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Robinson , in which Louisiana had asked the justices to review a ruling by a federal district court that would have required the state’s legislature to draw a new congressional map that included a second majority-Black district. The case had been on hold for nearly a year, waiting for the court to issue its ruling in Allen v.
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) authorization of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from three facilities in Louisiana, Maryland, and Texas. The mining company’s emergency motion after the August 2017 order asked the court to amend its judgment and stay the injunction. 349-6-16WNCV (Vt.
.” Ironically, it was the only part of the president’s remarks that is consistent with what the court actually said in its decision in Dobbs v. Wade, the courtruled that millions of citizens, not nine justices, must now decide the question of abortion. It would also unleash potential legal challenges.
Because the balance of factors was likely to shift over time, the court said it would reevaluate the stay if the Eighth Circuit appeal was not resolved in 12 months. The court also denied Minnesota’s motion for attorney fees, concluding that “removal advanced critical legal questions that have not yet been resolved by the higher courts.”
The vaccine disputes came to the court last month on an emergency basis, a procedural posture in which the justices might have generally been inclined to dispose of them with a brief order without hearing argument. 7 on whether the mandates can remain in place while challenges to their legality continue in the lower courts.
Circuit to hold the cases in abeyance was to allow the federal district for the District of Columbia to resolve cases challenging NHTSA’s action that raise similar legal issues. The district court scheduled a hearing for April 16, 2020 to consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer those cases. Williams , No.
Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out a lawsuit seeking to limit the government’s ability to communicate with social media companies about their content moderation policies. By a vote of 6-3, the courtruled that that the plaintiffs did not have a legal right, known as standing, to bring their lawsuit.
In a series of recent decisions, federal courts across the United States have addressed a range of significant legal issues, from civil rights and constitutional law to administrative authority and criminal justice. Additionally, cases that reversed lower court decisions or set new legal precedents were considered more significant.
But in response to legal challenges, Congress amended the law in 2022 to give the FTC the power to make changes to the authoritys rules. A group of states brought suit in a federal district court in Kentucky, challenging the constitutionality of the HISA and its funding mechanism.
Louisiana Federal Court Halted Work on Crude Oil Pipeline in Swamp Area. The federal district court for the Middle District of Louisiana enjoined work on the Bayou Bridge Pipeline in the Atchafalaya Basin in Louisiana. The court ordered the Board of Regents to produce all requested records within 90 days.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
To the contrary,” the clinic writes, “two generations – spanning almost five decades – have come to depend on the availability of legal abortion, and the right to make this decision has been further cemented as critical to gender equality.”. There have been no such changes, the clinic underscores. “To Last year, in Ramos v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content