This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Recently, I reported here on the “quiet” launch of a new legal research service, Decisis , targeting bar associations and 1-2 lawyer law firms. as well as president of the company that created Decisis, Legal InQuery Solutions. I now have more information on the launch of the service, based on my interview yesterday with Jeffrey S.
Her parents, Angela Rodriguez and Adan Rodriguez, sued Lasting Hope and Benton’s employer, University of Nebraska Medical Center Physicians, but the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the action due to a lack of any legal duty to warn or protect the girlfriend. We have discussed decisions extending Tarasoff.
That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, courtrules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches. Some, as noted above, have even banned the practice at common law, though state courts have increasingly relaxed those rules in favor of regulation. [23]
They argued that there is no legal remedy to address these harms. ” After the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization , abortion rights now depend on state laws. On the contrary, Florida, Nebraska and South Dakota rejected the amendments.
The landmark 5-4 ruling also concluded that the Kansas law governing the practice did not constitute double jeopardy since it merely authorized “civil” rather than “criminal” commitments. As with other sex offense laws life the public registry, these laws only serve to extend punishment beyond a court sentence.
Other states, such as Nebraska and Oklahoma , have succeeded in enacting legislation that defines sex on reproductive terms, and Mississippi is currently attempting to do the same. In 2023, DuBose sponsored a bill that similarly sought to define sex based on individuals’ reproductive systems, but that bill was indefinitely postponed.
I was blessed to have had stellar legal representation. Free legal representation is highly sought but few are willing to do the work. But we also have a legal system in which the right to an adequate defense, regardless of whether you have enough money to pay for it, is protected by the Constitution, under the landmark Gideon v.
A class action lawsuit against the MSOP struck an early victory in the 2015 Minnesota District Courtruling Karsjens v. Logue is a Nebraska registrant and activist for the rights of returning citizens, and founder of the sex offense education and reform website OnceFallen.com. Paul news media.
Nebraska and South Carolina now stand out as particular circumstances in which states are still wielding capital punishment — but without the lethal injection drugs. .
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Wednesday rejected the Biden Administration’s attempt to stay a lower courtruling which found President Joe Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan unlawful. This is just the latest in a series of legal blows to the Biden administration’s federal student loan forgiveness plan.
The vaccine disputes came to the court last month on an emergency basis, a procedural posture in which the justices might have generally been inclined to dispose of them with a brief order without hearing argument. 7 on whether the mandates can remain in place while challenges to their legality continue in the lower courts.
Not only that, but four states — Nebraska, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky — rescinded their prior ratifications; a fifth, South Dakota, set its ratification to expire if the ERA was not adopted by the 1979 deadline. In 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. But it fell short of that constitutional threshold.
Share The Supreme Court will fast-track a challenge to the Biden administration’s student-debt relief program and hear oral argument in February, the court said Thursday. The $400 billion program will remain on hold in the meantime due to lower-courtrulings that have blocked the government from implementing it.
Either or both cases could return to the Supreme Court once the federal appeals courtsrule on the merits of the dispute. Nebraska , a divided courtruled that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority when it announced the debt relief program, which relied on the HEROES Act, a law passed in the wake of the Sept.
Six states, led by Nebraska, went to federal court in Missouri to challenge the program. He concluded that the states do not have a legal right to sue, known as standing. He relied on the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003, a law passed in the wake of the Sept. District Judge Henry Autrey, a George W.
The federal courtruled resoundingly in favor of SIFMA, finding for plaintiffs on all counts. Keenan subsequently filed a second motion for summary judgment to seek closure on legal arguments the court did not address when granting the injunction. The issue of standing must also be considered.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. Nebraska , characterizing the decision as a straightforward interpretation of federal law. But before the court could reach that question, it had to determine whether any of the challengers had a legal right to sue, known as standing.
Share Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will retire from the court at the end of the 2021-22 term, NBC News reported on Wednesday. Breyer stressed that because the Nebraska law did not have any exception to protect the health of the mother, it was unconstitutional.
By invoking “leading legal constitutional scholars,” Biden only added redundancy to absurdity in claiming that the Equal Rights Amendment is now law. However, in 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.) It failed to do so.
In the 17 years following her graduation from law school, Jackson held a variety of legal jobs. While much of that experience is typical for a Supreme Court short-lister, one line on Jackson’s resume is not: her mid-career decision to spend two years as a public defender. In Stenberg v.
Archivist, Colleen Shogan recently explained that neither her office nor the White House have the authority to publish the amendment unilaterally or waive the deadline for ratification: In 2020 and again in 2022, the Office of Legal Counsel of the U.S. However, in 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content