This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) Monday denied ExxonMobil Corp.’s The Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey released a statement following the SJC’s decision affirming the rejection of ExxonMobil’s “ anti-SLAPP ” motion to dismiss by the Suffolk Superior Court.
Yet it happened again this week — and it happened not once, but in two separate cases, one in Missouri and the other in Massachusetts. In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet.
Citing Massachusetts v. EPA , the court stated that states have “a legitimate interest in combatting the adverse effects of climate change.” Second, the court found no “significant conflict” between any “concrete and specific” federal policy or interest and the application of Hawai‘i law.
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S. ADDITION TO THE NON-U.S.
Share In 2003, the Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. Two years after that ruling, the Harvard case went to trial before a federal district judge in Massachusetts. The test that it outlines is so vague, SFFA argues, that the only way to determine whether a university can meet it is through litigation.
The court also denied review in 10-time relist L.M. Middleborough , involving a Massachusetts middle-school student who was barred from wearing to school a shirt stating There Are Only Two Genders. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit upheld the schools decision, finding no First Amendment violation.
Rollins challenges a Massachusetts law that makes it a felony to secretly record the speech of anyone other than a law enforcement officer, irrespective of motive. Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law.
The appellate court was already expediting review of the case, and the dismissal was “without prejudice.” ” The health care workers can refile if circumstances change or if the appellate courtrules against them. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct.
As a result of its filing in French court, Carven has been “put into receivership,” a legal proceeding in which companies are placed into the responsibility of a legally-appointed individual, who acts as custodian of its assets and/or business operations. Carven is looking for a buyer. May 2018 – Rockport Group.
The courtruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” 1500 Massachusetts Avenue. particularly those with ravenous monkeys.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Given this “unmitigable prejudice,” the court concluded “that this litigation cannot, in good conscience, continue in the Tribe’s absence.”
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The court also declined to “create a new tort named abusive litigation.” CLIMATE LITIGATION CHART. and non-U.S.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon put on hold an order by a federal judge in Massachusetts that would have required the Department of Education to reinstate more than $65 million in grants that it terminated in February because they funded programs that included diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
The district courtruled in favor of the plaintiffs on most claims, finding that the DPOC and DPOR requirements were preempted by the NVRA and violated the VRA, but it rejected the Equal Protection claim. Adam Feldman runs the litigation consulting company Optimized Legal Solutions LLC. 8 Elliot Greenfield, Alexander C.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Federal Court Upheld Environmental Review for Forest Thinning Project. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, in an opinion that she read from the bench – a signal of her strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling. Trump’s order spawned multiple challenges in federal courts around the country, including in Washington, Maryland, and Massachusetts. either illegally or temporarily.
Sandford , which held that a Black person whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as enslaved persons were not entitled to any protection from the federal courts because he was not a U.S. District Judges Deborah Boardman in Maryland and Leo Sorokin in Massachusetts also put Trumps order on hold. Two other judges U.S.
The Supreme Court declined to take up his petition for review. James Otis was a Massachusetts defense lawyer and legislator whom Smithsonian Magazine describes as “one of the most influential protesters against Britain’s colonial laws.” In private practice, Sauer has continued to litigate hot-button issues. for U.S.
But in these cases, the Trump administration did not file a petition for review; instead, it filed emergency applications to partly block the orders issued by district courts in Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington. New Jersey , filed in Massachusetts by a group of 18 states, the District of Columbia, and San Francisco.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. The district court had granted Exxon’s motion to stay the case under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction to allow the U.S.
District Judge Patti Saris, a Massachusetts judge appointed by President Bill Clinton. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit by President Ronald Reagan, from 1997 to 1998. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit by President Ronald Reagan, from 1997 to 1998. From 1996 to 1997, Jackson served as a clerk to U.S
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content