This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The court found that the lawsuit was barred under res judicata because of it’s similarity to Fisher v. Abigail Fisher and Edward Blum, who were essential in the Fisher litigation, are now directors of the SFFA. The SFFA has filed similar lawsuits against other universities including Harvard and the University of NorthCarolina.
Tens of thousands of people serving punishments for felony convictions in NorthCarolina but who aren’t behind bars can now register to vote and cast ballots following an appeals courtruling, reports the Associated Press. million registered voters in NorthCarolina. There are more than 7.3
Share At oral arguments earlier this week the Supreme Court was skeptical of the Food and Drug Administrations effort to block a NorthCarolina-based company from challenging the denial of its application to market e-cigarettes in the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Louisiana.
So, for those of you who enjoy hypotheticals, here it is: Company A, a NorthCarolina LLC, owns four patents. Company B has the same corporate address in NorthCarolina and the same five shareholders as Company A. On that basis, the courtruled that the defendants had not satisfied their burden for transfer.
On Friday, the justices agreed to decide whether the Nollan / Dolan test applies to a California man’s challenge to a development fee, or whether – as a California appeals courtruled – the fee is instead immune from such review because it was authorized by legislation. A federal appeals courtruled that Fikre’s case was not moot.
In the absence of oversight boards and civil litigation, criminal charges against prosecutors and ethics board disciplinary measures are the only means of incentivizing appropriate prosecutorial actions. Adopt American Bar Association Rules for Defining Prosecutorial Misconduct. Certify Compliance.
The trial courtruled in favor of GLI. The Third Circuit ruled in favor of Raiders. The Supreme Court granted GLI’s cert petition and heard oral arguments on October 10, 2023. Decision The Court held that the issue of whether a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract is enforceable is governed by federal law.
Share In 2003, the Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. The two universities being challenged are Harvard University and the University of NorthCarolina. SFFA came to the Supreme Court in February 2021, asking the justices to review the 1st Circuit’s ruling. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit to weigh in.
. § 1254(2), the lesser-known companion to the provision that gives the Supreme Court certiorari jurisdiction (§1254(1)). Certification to a State Supreme Court, this Blog has noted , is a procedure the Sixth Circuit knows well. See In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig. , University of NorthCarolina , No.
This is not the only recent litigation involving electoral maps in the lead-up to the 2024 elections. On Tuesday, t wo prominent voting rights advocacy groups sued Republican state leadership in NorthCarolina over the state’s Congressional redistricting plans.
Paul Clement, the conservative Supreme Court advocate who frequently sparred with Ginsburg during oral arguments, called her “ a path-marking litigator for equality for women and a keen legal tactician.”. Ruth Ginsburg was one of the members of the Court who achieved greatness before she became a great justice,” he wrote.
The US Supreme Courtruled 8-1 Thursday in Berger v. NorthCarolina State Conference of the NAACP that two Republican state legislators may step in to defend the state’s voter identification law, even though the state’s Democratic attorney general is already doing so.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. climate litigation charts. Given this “unmitigable prejudice,” the court concluded “that this litigation cannot, in good conscience, continue in the Tribe’s absence.”
Share The Supreme Court on Monday refused to block orders by courts in NorthCarolina and Pennsylvania that threw out the congressional maps enacted by the states’ Republican legislatures and replaced them with maps drawn by the trial courts. The NorthCarolina case.
The non-profit has now also filed a petition in a challenge to the University of NorthCarolina that it hopes can serve as a companion to the Harvard case. In early November, the district courtruled that UNC’s use of race in admissions was consistent with Supreme Court precedents. University of NorthCarolina.
Harper arose from a challenge to a new congressional map adopted by NorthCarolina’s Republican-controlled legislature in early November 2021. The NorthCarolina Supreme Court struck down the map after finding that it was a partisan gerrymander in violation of the NorthCarolina constitution.
Below is my Hill column on the current litigation controversies around the country. We are still watching litigation playing out just a day before the election. They often refuse challengers access to vital election board information or bar cases as speculative or litigants as lacking in standing. Jamie Raskin (D.,
Share For the third time this term, the Supreme Court will weigh in on whether someone can stage an intervention – the legal kind, that is. The NorthCarolina legislature passed the voter-ID law at the center of the case in December 2018. Philip Berger, the leader of the NorthCarolina Senate. Background.
“This crabbed view of corruption,” O’Connor and Stevens concluded, “ignores precedent, common sense, and the realities of political fundraising exposed by the record in this litigation.” Federal Election Commission , the court overruled McConnell (as well as a 1990 campaign-finance decision, Austin v. In Citizens United v.
The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that two Republican legislators in NorthCarolina can join a lawsuit to defend the constitutionality of the state’s voter-identification law. In an 8-1 opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Courtruled that the Republican legislators have a right to intervene in the lawsuit.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content