This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The highest court in Massachusettsruled on Thursday that individuals under the age of 21 cannot be sentenced to life without parole, becoming the first state to do so. In their decision, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court concluded that “emerging adults, who are 18, 19, or 20, are not fully mature.”
is a no-fault state, state’s highest courtrules”: John R. Lance Reynolds of The Boston Herald reports that “ Massachusetts SJC orders $70K engagement ring be returned to man in failed love story.” ” You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts at this link. .”
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) Monday denied ExxonMobil Corp.’s The Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey released a statement following the SJC’s decision affirming the rejection of ExxonMobil’s “ anti-SLAPP ” motion to dismiss by the Suffolk Superior Court.
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Thursday ruled that Harvard University does not need to relinquish slave photos taken for a Harvard professor’s racist 1850 study to the photo subjects’ descendant, Tamara Lanier.
“Massachusetts judge can be prosecuted for blocking immigration arrest, courtrules”: Nate Raymond of Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued today.
Lawyers can’t exclude potential jurors during voir dire based on sexual orientation, the top court in Massachusettsruled on Monday. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial…
high courtrules possessing a switchblade knife is no longer a crime under the Second Amendment”: John R. And Nate Raymond of Reuters reports that “ Massachusetts high court strikes down switchblade ban.” “Mass. Ellement of The Boston Globe has this report.
An animal cruelty law does not reach a dog owner who ignored a veterinarian’s recommendation to euthanize her suffering, terminally ill dog, the Massachusetts Appeals…
Six states in the US allow for trials before six or eight-person juries in felony cases: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah. This deviation from the standard 12-person jury was permitted by the 1970 US Supreme Courtruling in Williams v.
The top court in Massachusetts has granted a new trial to a Black, Muslim defendant whose appointed lawyer expressed “vitriolic hatred” and racism in social…
“Supreme CourtRules on Tribal Police and Immigrants’ Testimony; In unanimous decisions, the justices refused to suppress evidence found by a tribal officer and rejected a presumption in favor of immigrants’ credibility”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.
The top state courts in Iowa and Massachusetts have ruled that restaurants can’t recover COVID-19 shutdown losses from "business interruption" policies. The Iowa Supreme Court…
Two potentially sweeping Massachusetts high courtrulings and a long-awaited employment bill lingering in the State House are among the issues Bay State attorneys say they are monitoring closely heading into the latter half of 2024.
cannot use a free speech statute to duck a climate change suit brought by the Massachusetts Attorney General, the state's top courtruled Tuesday, finding that the law in question applies to private suits but not public enforcement actions. ExxonMobil Corp.
An age discrimination case was undone by the fine print of an employment agreement, while an "utterly inadequate" document search led to a five-figure sanctions order, among other notable recent decisions in Massachusetts state court.
On December 17, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled that an employee discharged for submitting a written rebuttal to his employer in response to the placement of negative information.
During a busy 2023, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a strict fiduciary rule for Robinhood in a landmark decision, said a handshake can't save a $19 million Wynn Resorts land deal, and affirmed the right to be a total jerk at public meetings.
Judge Shannon Frison, sitting in the Middlesex County Superior Court in Massachusetts, recently issued a ruling that highlights for employers the importance of providing complete and timely responses to requests for employee personnel files.
The US Supreme Courtruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. The Court determined that forcing the designer to comply with CADA would violate her First Amendment right to free speech under the US Constitution. Patrick’s Day Parade and sued under a Massachusetts public accommodation anti-discrimination law.
The appeals court likewise denied the injunction rejecting the plaintiffs’ claim that the University’s vaccine mandate infringed on their fundamental rights. ” The post Federal appeals court upholds Indiana University COVID-19 vaccine mandate appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.
Yet it happened again this week — and it happened not once, but in two separate cases, one in Missouri and the other in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts case did involve a lawyer, as well as the lawyer’s associate and two recent law school graduates not yet admitted to practice. In the Massachusetts case, Smith v.
Supreme Court'sruling granting defendants facing administrative civil penalties the right to a jury trial, experts say a similar challenge in Massachusetts is likely, but may not find as receptive a judicial audience. Following the U.S.
The court relisted Escobar back in June 2024 and has been holding it ever since, pending the resolution of Glossip. The Supreme Courtruled in favor of Richard Glossip in late February , holding that the prosecution there violated its constitutional obligation under Napue to correct false testimony. Relisted after the Jan.
Federal prosecutors have told a Massachusetts federal court that a Russian national convicted of orchestrating a $90 million hack-and-trade scheme can't use a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to show that his case should have been brought in a different venue.
On July 28, 2021, a federal district court in Massachusetts issued a decision in Victim Rights Law Center et al. Cardona, No. 1:20-cv-11104, 2021 WL 3185743 (D. July 28, 2021).
For example, Massachusetts law permits licensing authorities to consider whether an individual has been subject to a protective order in the past and whether an individual has ever been arrested or charged with a crime. This law was challenged by an abuser, who claimed it violated his Second Amendment rights.
More than two dozen states — including Massachusetts — and the District of Columbia have already disallowed putting juveniles behind bars for life with no chance at parole. A new Washington, D.C., law allows those under the age of 25 at the time of their crime to apply for a new sentence after 15 years.
Other states that mention flat fees in their rules include California, Florida and Massachusetts. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. Colorado has even published a sample flat-fee agreement here. The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal. All billing structures have pros and cons.
The First Circuit reversed a lower court'sruling Friday and held that Massachusetts-based Lyft drivers suing to gain employee status must privately arbitrate their claims because they do not qualify as transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce who would otherwise be exempt from arbitration.
The justices said Monday they will review a lower-courtruling that upheld New York’s restrictive gun permit law. The court’s action follows mass shootings in recent weeks in Indiana, Georgia, Colorado and California. The others are: California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island.
The court cited states’ “broad authority to protect residents’ health, safety, property, and general welfare,” and said this power “was not to be preempted unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.” Citing Massachusetts v. Implications for climate cases against fossil fuel companies.
Arizona he asks the Supreme Court to overrule a 1970 precedent holding that states can use juries as small as six jurors to try defendants for felonies. Currently, six states provide for criminal juries of six or eight jurors: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Utah.
The battle over services that record and stream over-the-air TV without compensation to TV broadcasters has become even more confusing, with a US District Court judge in Boston denying an injunction to stop the Aereo service in Massachusetts in a suit brought by Hearst Corporation, which owns a local TV station.
The US Supreme Courtruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The US District Court Southern District of Texas ruled in favor of the states, enjoining Homeland Security from enforcing the memorandum.
courts have found the requirement of at least a 50 percent survivability line to be too severe. One of the first opinions was handed down in 2008 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Matsuyama v. That case involved a patient who complained about gastric distress and was diagnosed as gastritis.
As a result of its filing in French court, Carven has been “put into receivership,” a legal proceeding in which companies are placed into the responsibility of a legally-appointed individual, who acts as custodian of its assets and/or business operations. Carven is looking for a buyer. May 2018 – Rockport Group.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects.
The city normally flies the same three flags on the flagpoles: the American flag and the POW/MIA flag on one flagpole, the Massachusetts flag on the second flagpole, and its own flag on the third. A federal district courtruled for the city, and the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld that ruling.
Share In 2003, the Supreme Courtruled in Grutter v. Two years after that ruling, the Harvard case went to trial before a federal district judge in Massachusetts. Bollinger that universities may consider race in their admissions processes as part of their efforts to achieve diversity on campus.
Rollins challenges a Massachusetts law that makes it a felony to secretly record the speech of anyone other than a law enforcement officer, irrespective of motive. Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law.
The appellate court was already expediting review of the case, and the dismissal was “without prejudice.” ” The health care workers can refile if circumstances change or if the appellate courtrules against them. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Monday ruled that no-excuse mail-in voting and early voting are permissable under the state’s constitution. After Massachusett Governor Charlie Baker signed the VOTES Act in June, the law faced legal challenges from Massachusetts Republicans.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content