ABA Journal

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023

An animal cruelty law does not reach a dog owner who ignored a veterinarian’s recommendation to euthanize her suffering, terminally ill dog, the Massachusetts Appeals…

Court Rules 131

Court Rules Court Laws 131

JURIST

NOVEMBER 8, 2022

Six states in the US allow for trials before six or eight-person juries in felony cases: Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah. This deviation from the standard 12-person jury was permitted by the 1970 US Supreme Court ruling in Williams v.

Felony 249

Felony Court Court Rules Criminal Law 249

JURIST

APRIL 17, 2021

In 1922, the MLB received an exemption from the Sherman Antitrust Act when the Supreme Court ruled that professional baseball is not interstate commerce. Republican Senators Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Josh Hawley, Marsha Blackburn, and Mike Lee introduced the bill to remove MLB’s antitrust exemption.

Sports 211

Sports Court Rules Legal Legal 211

ABA Journal

FEBRUARY 9, 2022

The top state court in Massachusetts on Monday ruled against a Snapchat user who was prosecuted after posting a gun video seen by a "friend"…

Court Rules 102

Court Rules Court 102

LegalReader

FEBRUARY 18, 2021

Massachusetts superior court rules woman's hospice claim can move forward.

Court Rules 105

Court Rules Court Litigating Litigation 105

ABA Journal

JUNE 16, 2023

The top court in Massachusetts has granted a new trial to a Black, Muslim defendant whose appointed lawyer expressed “vitriolic hatred” and racism in social…

Court Rules 102

Court Rules Court Lawyer Lawyers 102

HowAppealing

JUNE 2, 2021

“Supreme Court Rules on Tribal Police and Immigrants’ Testimony; In unanimous decisions, the justices refused to suppress evidence found by a tribal officer and rejected a presumption in favor of immigrants’ credibility”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Immigration 100

Immigration Court Rules Court 100

ABA Journal

APRIL 25, 2022

The top state courts in Iowa and Massachusetts have ruled that restaurants can’t recover COVID-19 shutdown losses from "business interruption" policies. The Iowa Supreme Court…

Court Rules 98

Court Rules Court 98

Law 360

JULY 30, 2024

Two potentially sweeping Massachusetts high court rulings and a long-awaited employment bill lingering in the State House are among the issues Bay State attorneys say they are monitoring closely heading into the latter half of 2024.

Court Rules 96

Court Rules Attorney Court 96

Law 360

MAY 24, 2022

cannot use a free speech statute to duck a climate change suit brought by the Massachusetts Attorney General, the state's top court ruled Tuesday, finding that the law in question applies to private suits but not public enforcement actions. ExxonMobil Corp.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Statute Court Attorney 52

Law 360

DECEMBER 3, 2024

An age discrimination case was undone by the fine print of an employment agreement, while an "utterly inadequate" document search led to a five-figure sanctions order, among other notable recent decisions in Massachusetts state court.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court 52

Mondaq

DECEMBER 29, 2021

On December 17, 2021, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled that an employee discharged for submitting a written rebuttal to his employer in response to the placement of negative information.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court 40

Law 360

DECEMBER 15, 2023

During a busy 2023, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a strict fiduciary rule for Robinhood in a landmark decision, said a handshake can't save a $19 million Wynn Resorts land deal, and affirmed the right to be a total jerk at public meetings.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court 52

Mondaq

OCTOBER 25, 2021

Judge Shannon Frison, sitting in the Middlesex County Superior Court in Massachusetts, recently issued a ruling that highlights for employers the importance of providing complete and timely responses to requests for employee personnel files.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court 40

JURIST

JUNE 30, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. The Court determined that forcing the designer to comply with CADA would violate her First Amendment right to free speech under the US Constitution. Patrick’s Day Parade and sued under a Massachusetts public accommodation anti-discrimination law.

Court 129

Court Court Rules Laws Attorney 129

JURIST

AUGUST 4, 2021

The appeals court likewise denied the injunction rejecting the plaintiffs’ claim that the University’s vaccine mandate infringed on their fundamental rights. ” The post Federal appeals court upholds Indiana University COVID-19 vaccine mandate appeared first on JURIST - News - Legal News & Commentary.

Court 118

Court Education Court Rules Legal 118

LawSites

FEBRUARY 22, 2024

Yet it happened again this week — and it happened not once, but in two separate cases, one in Missouri and the other in Massachusetts. The Massachusetts case did involve a lawyer, as well as the lawyer’s associate and two recent law school graduates not yet admitted to practice. In the Massachusetts case, Smith v.

Court 145

Court Lawyer Lawyers Attorney 145

Law 360

AUGUST 1, 2024

Supreme Court's ruling granting defendants facing administrative civil penalties the right to a jury trial, experts say a similar challenge in Massachusetts is likely, but may not find as receptive a judicial audience. Following the U.S.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court 52

Law 360

JUNE 22, 2023

Federal prosecutors have told a Massachusetts federal court that a Russian national convicted of orchestrating a $90 million hack-and-trade scheme can't use a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision to show that his case should have been brought in a different venue.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court Court Decisions 40

Mondaq

OCTOBER 2, 2021

On July 28, 2021, a federal district court in Massachusetts issued a decision in Victim Rights Law Center et al. Cardona, No. 1:20-cv-11104, 2021 WL 3185743 (D. July 28, 2021).

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court Laws 40

The Crime Report

AUGUST 4, 2022

The Supreme Court’s June ruling expanding gun rights threatens to upend firearms restrictions across the country as activists wage court battles over everything from bans on AR-15-style guns to age limits, the Associated Press reports.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court Laws 40

The Crime Report

JUNE 25, 2021

More than two dozen states — including Massachusetts — and the District of Columbia have already disallowed putting juveniles behind bars for life with no chance at parole. A new Washington, D.C., law allows those under the age of 25 at the time of their crime to apply for a new sentence after 15 years.

Court Rules 52

Court Rules Court Attorney Laws 52

Law 360

NOVEMBER 5, 2021

The First Circuit reversed a lower court's ruling Friday and held that Massachusetts-based Lyft drivers suing to gain employee status must privately arbitrate their claims because they do not qualify as transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce who would otherwise be exempt from arbitration.

Court Rules 40

Court Rules Court 40

Attorney at Work

OCTOBER 11, 2022

Other states that mention flat fees in their rules include California, Florida and Massachusetts. About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. Colorado has even published a sample flat-fee agreement here. The ‘Reasonable Test’ Remains Universal. All billing structures have pros and cons.

Lawyer 271

Lawyer Lawyers Legal Services Depositions 271

The Crime Report

APRIL 26, 2021

The justices said Monday they will review a lower-court ruling that upheld New York’s restrictive gun permit law. The court’s action follows mass shootings in recent weeks in Indiana, Georgia, Colorado and California. The others are: California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island.

Court 52

Court Court Rules Laws 52

JURIST

JANUARY 12, 2024

The highest court in Massachusetts ruled on Thursday that individuals under the age of 21 cannot be sentenced to life without parole, becoming the first state to do so. In their decision, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court concluded that “emerging adults, who are 18, 19, or 20, are not fully mature.”

Court Rules 223

Court Rules Court Attorney 223

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

The court cited states’ “broad authority to protect residents’ health, safety, property, and general welfare,” and said this power “was not to be preempted unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.” Citing Massachusetts v. Implications for climate cases against fossil fuel companies.

Court 85

Court Tort Cause of Action Litigation 85

Broadcast Law Blog

OCTOBER 11, 2013

The battle over services that record and stream over-the-air TV without compensation to TV broadcasters has become even more confusing, with a US District Court judge in Boston denying an injunction to stop the Aereo service in Massachusetts in a suit brought by Hearst Corporation, which owns a local TV station.

Court 40

Court Statute Court Rules 40

JURIST

JUNE 24, 2023

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The US District Court Southern District of Texas ruled in favor of the states, enjoining Homeland Security from enforcing the memorandum.

Immigration 211

Immigration Court Rules Court Statute 211

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 17, 2022

The city normally flies the same three flags on the flagpoles: the American flag and the POW/MIA flag on one flagpole, the Massachusetts flag on the second flagpole, and its own flag on the third. A federal district court ruled for the city, and the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld that ruling.

Government 124

Government Court Court Rules 124

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 28, 2021

For example, Massachusetts law permits licensing authorities to consider whether an individual has been subject to a protective order in the past and whether an individual has ever been arrested or charged with a crime. This law was challenged by an abuser, who claimed it violated his Second Amendment rights.

Misdemeanor 98

Misdemeanor Laws Court Court Rules 98

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 20, 2025

The court relisted Escobar back in June 2024 and has been holding it ever since, pending the resolution of Glossip. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Richard Glossip in late February , holding that the prosecution there violated its constitutional obligation under Napue to correct false testimony. Relisted after the Jan.

Court 87

Court Attorney Tort Laws 87

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 26, 2022

Share In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. Two years after that ruling, the Harvard case went to trial before a federal district judge in Massachusetts. Bollinger that universities may consider race in their admissions processes as part of their efforts to achieve diversity on campus.

Court 112

Court Education Litigating Litigation 112

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 13, 2022

San Francisco Regional Director Jill Coffman declared that the company is violating the rights of workers in 10 different states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, Washington, Indiana, and California). In her consolidated complaint against Whole Foods Market, Inc.,

Lawyer 10

Lawyer Lawyers Government Court Rules 10

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 28, 2021

Rollins challenges a Massachusetts law that makes it a felony to secretly record the speech of anyone other than a law enforcement officer, irrespective of motive. Next, we explore the bounds of the Federal Arbitration Act, with a pair of petitions arguing that California’s efforts to restrict arbitration agreements undermine federal law.

Felony 131

Felony Statute Attorney Court 131

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 25, 2021

The appellate court was already expediting review of the case, and the dismissal was “without prejudice.” ” The health care workers can refile if circumstances change or if the appellate court rules against them. They also can refile if the lower court has not reached a decision by Oct.

Government 54

Government Court Laws Law School 54