This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled Tuesday that a Minnesota law requiring handgun carry permit applicants to be at least 21 years of age is unconstitutional. Regarding US history, the court rejected the state’s argument that 18 to 20-year-olds were denied the right to bear arms under common law.
The US Supreme Courtruled Thursday that the government cannot keep the profits of properties sold to pay off tax debts. The court reached this decision in the case of Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al. wherein a local Minnesota government sold off a woman’s condo to satisfy her tax bill.
Products liability suits against Ford Motors in Montana and Minnesota can go forward in their respective state courts, said the US Supreme Court on Thursday. The court rejected Ford’s argument that personal specific jurisdiction was limited to lawsuits in states where Ford manufactured or originally sold vehicles.
“Controversial MN Supreme Courtruling fuels legislative change to protect sexual assault survivors; With student support, the Minnesota Legislature is working to close the ‘intoxication loophole'”: Samantha Woodward of The Minnesota Daily, the student newspaper of the University of Minnesota, has this report.
“States Are Not Entitled to Windfalls in Tax Disputes, Supreme CourtRules; In a unanimous decision, the justices sided with a 94-year-old woman who got nothing when a Minnesota county sold her condominium to recoup unpaid taxes”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. Supreme Court in Tyler v.
“Minnesota city can’t ban filming of kids at parks, appeals courtrules; A three-judge appellate panel overturned an ordinance banning the filming of children in city parks, finding it violates the First Amendment”: Andy Monserud of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that the U.S.
“MinnesotaCourtRuling Fuels Calls to Change Sexual Assault Law; The state Supreme Court tossed out a man’s conviction on a third-degree sexual conduct charge because the woman he was accused of assaulting was ‘voluntarily intoxicated’ at the time”: Christina Morales of The New York Times has this report.
“Minnesota Supreme Court: Rape victims not ‘mentally incapacitated’ unless forcibly intoxicated; The far-reaching decision also gives a man convicted of third-degree sexual assault a new trial.” ” You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Minnesota at this link.
Victims who willingly consume alcohol or drugs before they are sexually assaulted aren’t “mentally incapacitated,” the Minnesota Supreme Courtruled Wednesday. The 6-0 decision, written…
In 2021 a federal district courtruled that the government was partially responsible for the deaths due to negligence. The settlement issued Wednesday will resolve all appeals from this ruling. Last week, state legislation has increased firearm access in Florida and Minnesota.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has handed down a major ruling in Worth v. The opinion by Judge Duane Benton upholds a lower court in striking down a Minnesota law limiting gun permits for persons 21 years old. Jacobson in favor of the Second Amendment. ” That argument is meritless.
ASEA filed counterclaims asking the court to enjoin Alaska from implementing the governor’s administrative order and from making any changes to the dues-deduction processes that were in place before the opinion was issued. After this conference, we should have a better idea whether the Supreme Court is persuaded. That’s all for now.
The courtruled in favor of the defendants, holding that their use of the briefs constituted “fair use” under the Section 107 of the Copyright Act. The court found that the defendants’ inclusion of the briefs in their databases was transformative, as it contributed to creating an interactive legal research tool.
Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co., The Federal Circuit applied the correct standard consistent with Supreme Court precedent, including KSR and Deere , focusing on the knowledge and capabilities of a person of ordinary skill in the art. Louis Hirsch , 302 U.S. 490 (1938) (“plainly foreshadowed”) De Forest Radio Co. General Elec.
The district courtruled for the officers, and the 8th Circuit affirmed. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated 28 U.S.C. After 15 minutes, Gilbert stopped breathing. His parents sued the city, arguing that the officers had used excessive force against their son in violation of the Constitution. Issue : Whether the U.S.
Moreover, individual courtrules are now requiring greater transparency. The Federal Circuit’s latest rules clearly seek to maximize public disclosure. In each filing, Rule 25.1(d) University of Minnesota Law School. See DePuy Synthes Products Inc. Veterinary Orthopedic Implants (Fed. Tulane University Law School.
A Minnesota district courtruled Monday that state “abortion laws relating to mandated physician care, hospitalization, criminalization, parental notification, and informed consent are unconstitutional” under Minnesota’s State Constitution.
The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. In Minnesota v. Zepeda , No. 80593-2-I (Wash. Chevron Corp. 20-cv-1636 (D.
“Minnesota Supreme Court: ‘Revenge porn’ not protected free speech; The Minnesota Supreme Courtruled that the law is narrowly written to avoid violating other speech.” ” You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Minnesota at this link.
In a 2015 Op Ed for the Minnesota Star-Tribune , former Minnesota State Senator Don Betzold said of the controversial Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP): The sex offender treatment program is like a prison — only worse, because there’s no ‘out’ date.
In the years following Hendricks , states have turned civil commitment centers into expansions of state prisons, detaining people long beyond the end of their court-issued sentences and detaining them indefinitely. Nowhere is this more evident than in the state of Minnesota. Many stay incarcerated until death.
Share This article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Fulton v. Thomas (Minnesota). City of Philadelphia. Berg is the James L. Oberstar professor of law and public policy at the University of St. Douglas Laycock is the Robert E. Scott distinguished professor of law at the University of Virginia.
The North Dakota South Central Judicial District Courtruled in favor of Red River Women’s Clinic, granting a motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the ban from taking effect while the lawsuit moves through the legal system.
The most significant barrier to criminal justice reform may not be deadlocked politicians or conservative special interests, but the “law enforcement lobby,” warns a forthcoming essay in the Minnesota Law Review. How does the law enforcement lobby perpetuate harm? The authors point to the disappointing implementation of Brown v.
The Supreme Courtruled that tort law could not be used to overcome First Amendment protections for free speech or the free press. The Court sought to create “breathing space” for the media by articulating that standard that now applies to both public officials and public figures.
Supreme Court (James Walsh, The Minnesota Star Tribune) Trump administration touts deportations under Alien Enemies Act after a judge temporarily blocked its use (Megan Lebowitz, Julia Ainsley, Gary Grumbach. &
Loertscher’s legal team — which included now-Attorney General Josh Kaul — was most successful, securing a federal courtruling that deemed the law unconstitutional. The four other states which permit civil commitment — the Dakotas, Oklahoma and Minnesota — all require “clear and convincing evidence.”.
The Minnesota Supreme Court has tossed a lawsuit contending that former President Donald Trump can’t appear on the primary ballot in the state because he…
“State court dismissed petition seeking to bar Trump from 2024 ballot; Minnesota Supreme Courtruled exceedingly fast after hearing oral arguments Thursday; an appeal is likely”: Rochelle Olson of The Minneapolis Star Tribune has this report on an order that the Supreme Court of Minnesota issued today.
The court found, however, that the plaintiff failed to show that the defendants had not considered climate change effects on the Mexican spotted owl and therefore held that the FWS’s analysis of climate change was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The case was argued before the High Court on January 22, 2019. WildEarth Guardians v.
Federal Court Stayed Remand Order in Minnesota’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Industry, Denied Attorney Fees. The federal district court for the District of Minnesota stayed its order remanding Minnesota’s climate change lawsuit against the fossil fuel industry. Minnesota v. 0:20-cv-01636 (D. Louis area.
Groff sued USPS in federal court under Title VII for refusing to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices. The trial courtruled for the Postal Service under Hardison , and the U.S. Hennepin County, Minnesota and Nieveen v. Hennepin County, Minnesota , 22-166. A jury awarded Younger $700,000 in damages.
An appeal is now expected to proceed and the matter could well end up in front of the Supreme Court. Last week, the Minnesota Supreme Courtruled in a similar case that Trump could not be removed from the primary ballot in that state. Another ruling is expected soon out of Colorado.
The Supreme Court’s cases are also contrary to the legislators’ theory, North Carolina and the challengers tell the justices, making clear that state courts had the authority to consider the challengers’ gerrymandering claims. In its 1932 decision in Smiley v. And in Rucho v.
Because the neighbors produced no other testimony and relied “merely on speculation that the excavation, regrading, and moving of materials would produce undue impacts,” the court upheld the Commission’s findings. MinnesotaCourt and D.C. Federal Court Declined to Stop Construction of Enbridge Line 3 Pipeline.
Thompson agreed with Roberts that a governor’s veto can limit the legislature’s power under the elections clause, pointing to the Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. Holm , in which the justices upheld the Minnesota governor’s veto of a congressional map enacted by the state legislature. Katyal said yes.
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. The action involved closing valves on pipelines in Washington, Montana, Minnesota, and North Dakota. appeal Feb.
As Compliance Date for Methane Waste Rule Nears, California Federal CourtRuled That BLM Could Not Postpone Compliance, Oil and Gas Trade Groups Again Asked Wyoming Federal Court for Preliminary Injunction. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
On March 1, the federal defendants filed their opposition to the motion to stay the mandate, arguing that the Supreme Court was unlikely to grant the petition, “much less reverse this Court’s judgment,” because the Ninth Circuit had applied settled precedent. Minnesota Auto Dealers Association v. Minnesota , No.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. On July 8, 2021, a jury in Minnesota state court found four activists guilty of aiding and abetting fourth degree criminal damage to property, a misdemeanor offense.
Maxine Waters, D-CA, went to Minnesota and told the protesters that they “gotta stay on the street” and “ get more confrontational.” These civil lawsuits actually raise claims like the infliction of emotional distress that were directly and unequivocally rejected by the Supreme Court.
Sekulow urged the court to take up the case quickly “to prevent the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision from having an irreparable effect on the electoral process.” He indicated that he was “prepared to abide by whatever expedited processes this Court may set.” And on Dec. And on Dec.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content