Court Rules Minnesota Statute 
JURIST
MAY 25, 2023
The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the government cannot keep the profits of properties sold to pay off tax debts. The court reached this decision in the case of Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al. wherein a local Minnesota government sold off a woman’s condo to satisfy her tax bill.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 11, 2020
The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii Court Ruled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. In Minnesota v. Zepeda , No. 80593-2-I (Wash. Chevron Corp. 20-cv-1636 (D.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Crime Report
DECEMBER 1, 2022
The National Advocates for Pregnant Women, a legal advocacy group, says Wisconsin’s fetal protection law is the most “egregious” of the civil statutes in the country. Loertscher’s legal team — which included now-Attorney General Josh Kaul — was most successful, securing a federal court ruling that deemed the law unconstitutional.
SCOTUSBlog
APRIL 18, 2025
This week, we highlight petitions asking the court to consider, among other things, whether to overturn a ruling by the Montana Supreme Court that struck down a state law requiring minors under the age of 18 to get consent from their parents before obtaining an abortion. 1101(a)(42). Jacobson v. Republican National Committee v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
NOVEMBER 7, 2017
The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. The court granted the company leave to amend its complaint with 21 days. A Minnesota trial court granted four environmental activists’ motion to present a necessity defense.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
The New Jersey court also found no basis for Grable jurisdiction, rejecting the companies’ arguments that the City’s claims necessarily raised substantial and actually disputed issues of federal law such as First Amendment issues or issues addressed by federal environmental statutes. Minnesota v. 0:20-cv-01636 (D.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 11, 2023
Groff sued USPS in federal court under Title VII for refusing to accommodate his religious beliefs and practices. The trial court ruled for the Postal Service under Hardison , and the U.S. Hennepin County, Minnesota and Nieveen v. Hennepin County, Minnesota , 22-166. A jury awarded Younger $700,000 in damages.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
211 
Let's personalize your content