JURIST

MARCH 26, 2023

Under this rule, the movant has the burden of showing that there has been a “significant change in facts or law [that] warrants revision of the decree.” ” Here, the court ruled that the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Wade , does not impact the statute’s constitutionality.

Statute 197

Statute Misdemeanor Felony Court Rules 197

The Crime Report

JANUARY 6, 2023

side without going through a designated port of entry, that same action becomes a misdemeanor or even a felony , depending on the circumstances. . In 1969, the Supreme Court held in Shapiro v. When someone ‘jaywalks’ from the Mexican side of the border to the U.S. Decriminalizing jaywalking was a measure of equity. Thompson that U.S.

Immigration 114

Immigration Laws Misdemeanor Government 114

JonathanTurley

JULY 11, 2021

which states a person who commits any primary offense — such as misdemeanor property destruction — with the intent to “intimidate or terrorize another person or with reason to believe that his action would intimidate or terrorize that person” is subject to a class B misdemeanor primary offense becoming a class A misdemeanor.

Misdemeanor 56

Misdemeanor Government Laws Statute 56

At the Lectern

DECEMBER 14, 2023

At its conference yesterday, a double one, the Supreme Court ruled on a robust 164 matters. The court granted review in EpicentRx, Inc. Had the defendant’s conviction been of a misdemeanor instead of later reduced to a misdemeanor, lifetime registration would have been discretionary instead of mandatory.

Misdemeanor 45

Misdemeanor Court Entertainment Felony 45

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 2, 2024

The statute is below. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that criminal threats must be based on a showing of a culpable mental state. Here is the statute: 13-1202. Threatening or intimidating pursuant to subsection A, paragraph 1 or 2 is a class 1 misdemeanor, except that it is a class 6 felony if: 1.

Felony 82

Felony Statute Misdemeanor Attorney 82

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

At the Lectern

MAY 29, 2025

Lots of action at the Supreme Court’s double conference yesterday. The court ruled on 195 matters, including: LGBTQ discrimination See: Supreme Court wont hear same-sex wedding cake case. Supreme Court to hear the case, according to Bob Egelko’s article in the San Francisco Chronicle.

Punitive Damages 45

Punitive Damages Demurrer Statute Court 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 45

Court Statute Government Construction 45

JonathanTurley

JUNE 24, 2024

Through various contortions, Bragg converted a dead misdemeanor case into 34 felonies in an unprecedented prosecution. New Yorkers and the media insisted that such selective prosecution was in defense of the “rule of law.” The court ruled that a jury had to decide this issue unanimously under a standard of beyond reasonable doubt.

Legal 62

Legal Legal Laws Court 62

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The court further found that EPCA’s legislative history did not support the plaintiff’s “expansive interpretation.”

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40