Remove Court Rules Remove Misdemeanor Remove Statute Remove Virginia
article thumbnail

Fourth Circuit Overturns Conviction Of Retired Air Force Colonel For Using Racial Slur

JonathanTurley

In a major but likely controversial victory for free speech, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturned the conviction of a retired Air Force Colonel for using a racial epithet at the shoe store on the Marine base at Quantico in Virginia. Bartow was charged under Virginia Code ยง 18.2-416,

Statute 36
article thumbnail

Freedom of Movement: Understanding Immigration Through The Lens Of Jaywalking Laws

The Crime Report

With the decriminalization of jaywalking in Nevada , Virginia and now California โ€” the โ€œ Freedom to Walk โ€ Act will take effect in Los Angeles in the new year โ€” it appears that people understand this when it comes to jaywalking, but not when it comes to immigration. . In 1969, the Supreme Court held in Shapiro v. Thompson that U.S.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. West Virginia Court Dismissed Defamation Suit Against John Oliver Brought by Coal Executive and His Companies.

Court 40
article thumbnail

June 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimoreโ€™s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 42
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not โ€œTruly Reasonableโ€. The court further found that EPCAโ€™s legislative history did not support the plaintiffโ€™s โ€œexpansive interpretation.โ€ Wild Virginia v. 3:20-cv-00045 (W.D.

Court 40