Court Rules Misdemeanor Texas 
The Crime Report
DECEMBER 7, 2023
Many Americans would classify Texas resident Zackey Rahimi, the man at the center of the case, as a dangerous person. In Bruen , the Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that New York State’s Sullivan Act, passed in 1911—which required anyone applying for a pistol concealed carry license to show “proper cause”—was unconstitutional.
JonathanTurley
JULY 11, 2021
which states a person who commits any primary offense — such as misdemeanor property destruction — with the intent to “intimidate or terrorize another person or with reason to believe that his action would intimidate or terrorize that person” is subject to a class B misdemeanor primary offense becoming a class A misdemeanor.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Crime Report
DECEMBER 8, 2022
“ Travis County judges can’t hear appeals from migrants arrested under Texas border security push, court rules ” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
SCOTUSBlog
FEBRUARY 24, 2025
Alito would reverse the lower courts ruling without additional briefing or oral arguments. He emphasized that the lower courts made more than a trifling mistake. Sotomayor suggested that [t]here is reason to thing that the Fourth Amendment might include the in-the-presence limitation on warrantless misdemeanor arrests.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 6, 2018
The California federal court said the substantive legal issues in the District of Wyoming case were distinct from the procedural issues at issue in this action. A few days after the California court issued its order, North Dakota and Texas asked the Wyoming federal court to lift a stay that the court had imposed in December 2017.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 24, 2024
Through various contortions, Bragg converted a dead misdemeanor case into 34 felonies in an unprecedented prosecution. New Yorkers and the media insisted that such selective prosecution was in defense of the “rule of law.” The court ruled that a jury had to decide this issue unanimously under a standard of beyond reasonable doubt.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JUNE 8, 2021
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district court rulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content