article thumbnail

Montana court rules in favor of youth plaintiffs in landmark climate trial

JURIST

A Montana state judge ruled Monday that a provision of state law is unconstitutional because it violates “the right to a clean and healthful environment,” a fundamental right enshrined in Montana’s Constitution. Montana , is the first constitutional climate suit in US history to make it to trial.

article thumbnail

In ‘monumental moment,’ Montana Supreme Court rules for youths claiming right to clean environment

ABA Journal

The Montana Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a state law banning consideration of greenhouse gas emissions in fossil-fuel-permitting decisions, citing a state constitutional provision…

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules state courts have personal jurisdiction in product liability cases against Ford

JURIST

Products liability suits against Ford Motors in Montana and Minnesota can go forward in their respective state courts, said the US Supreme Court on Thursday. The court rejected Ford’s argument that personal specific jurisdiction was limited to lawsuits in states where Ford manufactured or originally sold vehicles.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules against suppressing evidence found by tribal police on federal highways

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Tuesday that tribal police officers have the authority to detain and search non-Indigenous persons on federal highways within their territories. ” The court went on to state that detention is only permissible if a violation of law is “apparent.” United States v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Rules Tribal Police Can Detain and Search Non-Native Americans

Constitutional Law Reporter

Late one night, Officer James Saylor of the Crow Police Department approached a truck parked on United States Highway 212, a public right-of-way within the Crow Reservation in the State of Montana. In reaching its decision, the Court acknowledged the “general proposition” established in Montana v. United States , 450 U.S.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Allows Tribal Police to Detain Non-Indians

The Crime Report

. “But the Supreme Court decided to render a decision that was broader than that and applies to all of Indian Country by deciding for the first time ever that the second Montana exception was satisfied.” Explaining the decision, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer cited a precedent from a 1981 case, Montana v.

Court 116
article thumbnail

Morning Docket: 12.20.24

Above The Law

Roll on Friday ] * More analysis on the recent " the REAL ethical problem is pointing out that the Supreme Court is unethical " opinion. Law360 ] * Montana Supreme Court rules for the kids in climate change case. [ National Law Journal ] * Cosplaying as a judge for a TikTok parody lands lawyer in trouble.

Lawyer 101