This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that Nevada’s 50-person cap on religious gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic is unconstitutional because it places harsher attendance limits on religious gatherings than on casinos and other secular businesses. Thanks for your support! DONATE NOW.
Nevada Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske ordered Nye County’s hand count of ballots to cease immediately late Thursday night just hours after the Nevada Supreme Courtruled the county’s process violated state law. On October 25, the courtruled in favor of the ACLU of Nevada.
“Court reverses order on pandemic restrictions at Nevada churches”: David Ferrara has this front page article in today’s edition of The Las Vegas Review-Journal. Scott Sonner of The Associated Press reports that “ Appeals courtrules against Nevada cap on church attendance.”
“Supreme Courtrules on petition effort against A’s ballpark public financing bill”: Mick Akers of The Las Vegas Review-Journal has this report. And John Shea of The San Francisco Chronicle reports that “ Nevada Supreme Court thwarts 2024 ballot challenge to A’s $380 million stadium handout.”
Though a Nevada federal courts recent U.S. Boruchowitz decision involved unusual facts, the court'sruling that board members can be defrauded of their seat through misrepresentations increases fraud risks in more typical circumstances involving board elections, especially proxy fights, say attorneys at ArentFox Schiff.
unambiguously" applies to a coverage demand from the company's former in-house lawyer, a Nevada federal courtruled Friday. An insurance warranty letter signed by Adam Rogas, a now-convicted executive of defunct cybersecurity company NS8 Inc.,
California’s Native American community on Saturday celebrated the 100th anniversary of a state Supreme Court civil rights decision, Piper v. The commemorative event took place in Big Pine, located in Inyo County, east of the Sierra Nevada mountains. Big Pine School District (1924) 193 Cal.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Courtruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.
The Nevada Secretary of State’s Office confirmed on Friday that a proposed constitutional amendment to change identification procedures for in-person voting and mail ballots has qualified for the November ballot in Nevada. Chairman of the Nevada Republican Party Michael J.
Any day declared a holiday by the President or Congress, such as the recent National Day of Mourning for former President Jimmy Carter, is considered a Legal Holiday for the purpose of computing time in the federal court filings. And, as weve detailed in other blog articles, federal rules and local rules can differ widely.
That’s because current disclosure of litigation funding relies on a patchwork of state law, courtrules, self-reporting, FOIA requests, leaks to journalists, and funding pitches. Some, as noted above, have even banned the practice at common law, though state courts have increasingly relaxed those rules in favor of regulation. [23]
At the same time, Indian courts recognising lex situs have respected foreign judgements concerning overseas property, and have observed that foreign forums should also reciprocate by recognising Indian judgements concerning immovable property in India. Narasimha Rao v. Additionally, fraud by one of the parties can also be a vitiating factor.
There are certain lawyer retirement rules and regulation requirements you’ll need to follow—and they vary from state to state. . For example, Nevada lawyers will have a different retirement process than New York lawyers. In this article, we’ll outline the steps you need to take for a smooth and successful retirement.
Many courts have addressed the issue of taking blood samples from drivers without consent, including Texas and Nevada. However, on Friday, the Wisconsin Supreme Courtruled that the provision was unconstitutional.
In a per curiam opinion on Monday, the US Supreme Courtruled that the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in overturning the death sentence of inmate George Kayer, who robbed and murdered his companion on a gambling trip in Laughlin, Nevada, in 1994.
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit previously found that the final rule constitutes unlawful agency action because it “flouts clear statutory text and exceeds the legislatively imposed limits on agency authority in the name of public policy.” ” This is not the only litigation in the US over ghost guns.
In a declaration filed with the courts, chief restructuring officer William Kaye said Charlotte Olympia’s U.S. outposts — consisting of four locations in New York, California, and Nevada — had historically been unprofitable. Through bankruptcy, the brand plans to liquidate inventory and close all stores. The Fiorucci and Edwin Co.,
Like most states, Michigan courts’ rules for evidence — adopted from the Daubert standard, which was named after a Supreme Court decision issued almost 30 years ago — say trial judges are responsible for making sure expert testimony has a reliable foundation.
With the decriminalization of jaywalking in Nevada , Virginia and now California — the “ Freedom to Walk ” Act will take effect in Los Angeles in the new year — it appears that people understand this when it comes to jaywalking, but not when it comes to immigration. .
In 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.). In 2017, Nevada went ahead and ratified the dead amendment while Illinois did so in 2018. Yet, they still fell short. Freeman that Congress could not extend the ERA’s ratification deadline.
A New York courtruled last month that Kennedy could not appear on the state’s ballot because the address listed on his nominating petition was a “sham address that he assumed for the purpose of maintaining his voter registration and furthering his own political aspirations in” New York. The post Supreme Court denied RFK Jr.’s
As Compliance Date for Methane Waste Rule Nears, California Federal CourtRuled That BLM Could Not Postpone Compliance, Oil and Gas Trade Groups Again Asked Wyoming Federal Court for Preliminary Injunction. On October 4 , the federal district court for the Northern District of California vacated the U.S.
Share The Supreme Court on Friday left in place a ruling by the Nevada Supreme Court that keeps the Green Party off the state’s ballot for the 2024 general election. The Green Party had asked the justices to vacate the ruling while it appealed that decision, but in a brief unsigned order , the justices declined to do so.
Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Courtruled that although students have First Amendment rights while they are at school, school officials can regulate speech that would substantially disrupt the school’s work. the justices returned to the often-complicated question of student speech rights.
However, in 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.) In 2021 federal Judge Rudolph Contreras ruled that it would have been absurd for the Archivist to disregard the deadline and unilaterally add the unratified amendment to the Constitution.
However, in 1981, a federal district courtruled in Idaho v. The Supreme Court later stayed that order but then declared the matter moot.) Democrats then insisted that states could not rescind their votes, even before ratification was finalized. Freeman that Congress could not extend the ERAs ratification deadline.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content