This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Oregon Supreme Courtruled Friday that all state criminal convictions which resulted from nonunanimous jury verdicts are invalid. The ruling comes after a 2020 US Supreme Court decision that held non-unanimous jury verdicts violate the US Constitution’s Sixth Amendment. Justice Thomas A.
An Oregon county judge blocked Oregon Ballot Measure 114 (BM 114), Oregon’s gun control law, from taking effect on Tuesday. The court found that the ballot measure violated the state constitution , despite a previous federal courtruling finding that the measure complied with the US Constitution’s Second Amendment.
The post Oregon Supreme CourtRules On Messy Multimillionaire Heir, Egg Donor Case appeared first on Above the Law. Once again, a friendly reminder about sending your clients to attorneys with specialized experience in assisted reproductive technology when entering such contracts.
“Oregon Supreme Courtruling could end death sentences for many; Death penalty opponents expect the Thursday ruling will overturn many of the state’s death sentences”: Conrad Wilson and Dirk VanderHart of Oregon Public Broadcasting have this report on a ruling that the Supreme Court of Oregon issued yesterday.
“Oregon Supreme Court says no to Nick Kristof’s governor candidacy”: Lauren Dake of Oregon Public Broadcasting has this report. The opinion is not yet posted to the Supreme Court of Oregon ‘s website , but I will link to it once it becomes available.
“Ban on Non-Unanimous Verdicts Is Not Retroactive, Supreme CourtRules; The 6-to-3 decision, a sequel to a ruling last year, affects thousands of prisoners in Louisiana and Oregon”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G. .”
The Oregon Supreme Court recently ruled that the constitutional requirement for unanimous juries in serious criminal cases applies to older verdicts challenged in state post-conviction…
He told the state courts that to determine whether the fee passes constitutional muster, they should apply the test outlined by the Supreme Court in two property rights cases, Nollan v. City of Tigard, Oregon. Moreover, Kavanaugh stressed, “no prior decision of this Court has addressed or prohibited that longstanding practice.”
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday on whether enforcing public camping ordinances against unhoused people without adequate shelter is cruel and unusual punishment and, therefore, prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Johnson , originated in southern Oregon. The case, Grants Pass v. In the 1962 case Robinson v.
The US Supreme Courtruled Friday in a 6-3 decision to allow cities to enforce bans on homeless encampments even when shelter space is unavailable. In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. The National Homelessness Law Center took to X to address the matter saying that the “ Supreme Courtruling will make homelessness worse.”
Share The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that a lawsuit filed by an Oregon man who was placed on the No Fly List can go forward even after the government has removed him from the list and pledged not to return him to it “based on the currently available information.” This article was originally published at Howe on the Court.
The US Supreme Courtruled Tuesday that Yonas Fikre’s challenge to his previous placement on the No Fly List can proceed, rejecting the government’s claim that his removal from the list rendered the lawsuit void.
Additionally, the Vermont Supreme Courtruled in 1802 that once crossed over into Vermont, a slave contract from another state was unenforceable. Evidence lies in both the constitutional language and judicial precedent. Article 1 of Vermont’s Constitution states “[t]hat all persons are born equally free and independent.”
There is an interesting case out of Oregon where Judge Marco Hernández has ruled for a Portland State University Professor Bruce Gilley who was excluded from a Diversity Twitter page by the Communication Manager of the Division of Equity and Inclusion at the University of Oregon.
Supreme Court'sruling on an Oregon town's anti-camping ordinance, government incentives for manufactured housing communities, and the progress states have made toward building safety in the three years since the tragic condo collapse in Surfside, Florida.
An investigation has found that three currently employed and active Portland, Oregon cops were flagged by the Multnomah County district attorney for added scrutiny if they’re ever called to the stand, reports Willamette Week.
About the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism was established by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2005 under Supreme CourtRule 799(c) to foster increased civility, professionalism and inclusiveness among lawyers and judges in Illinois.
On Friday, the justices agreed to decide whether the Nollan / Dolan test applies to a California man’s challenge to a development fee, or whether – as a California appeals courtruled – the fee is instead immune from such review because it was authorized by legislation. A federal appeals courtruled that Fikre’s case was not moot.
Louisiana , the Supreme Courtruled that states could only convict defendants of serious offenses with a unanimous jury verdict. After Ramos , criminal defendant asks justices to preserve non-unanimous acquittals in Puerto Rico. In Ramos v. In Centeno v.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Courtruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.
Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Four years ago, the Supreme Courtruled in Nieves v. City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.
Then, in 2009 , the California Supreme Courtruled that the callousness of the original crime couldn’t be a parole board’s sole criterion for denying a person freedom. University of Oregon parole researcher Kristen Bell offers policy solutions, including better clarification of parole boards’ criteria.
The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii CourtRuled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Environmental Groups Challenged Authorization for New Natural Gas Plant in Oregon.
The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain courtrules on retirement.”. According to Law.com , attorney retirement in New York is “remarkably complex” with “variations of ‘retire’… used in different contexts.”
This week,we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether Barack Obama had the authority as president to expand a national monument in the forests of Oregon into land overseen by the Interior Department. The Oregon district court rejected the timber company’s challenge. But the D.C.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects. Klee , Nos.
Governor Newsom’s directive comes nearly a month after the US Supreme Court’s decision in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. It is not binding on cities and local governments but would include lands under the control of the Department of Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and Fish and Wildlife.
One month after he filed his petition, the courtruled in Ramos v. Because all three of Lambert’s convictions were non-unanimous, he asked the court to send his case back for a second look under Ramos. On remand, the state courtruled against Lambert under Betterman and Ramos. The justices agreed.
crime over the past 40 years has been the legalization of abortion which “led to a reduction in crime 18 years later, starting in 1992 and dropping sharply in 1995” citing case studies in states like California, Alaska, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. Alongside this, some have argued that one reason for the decrease in U.S.
Stutzman the owner added a religious hostility claim after Masterpiece cakeshp but on June 6, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Stutzman. Then the Supreme court denied certiorari in July 2021. On June 15, 2021, a Colorado District Courtruled in Scardina v.
The Oregon Supreme Courtruled Thursday against ten Republican state senators who staged a record-long walkout in 2023, disqualifying them from seeking reelection. The post Oregon Supreme Court bars ten state senators from reelection after walkout appeared first on JURIST - News.
While there is no index that lists cases in which bloodstain-pattern analysis played a role, state appellate courtrulings show that the technique has played a factor in felony cases across the country. Additionally, it has helped send innocent people to prison.
The majority opinion written by Judge Lawrence VanDyke noted the policy in upholding a policy that excluded trans women from the Miss United States of America pageant in Oregon. ” That issue came up in the Oregon case of Anita Green.
IBLA also said the quantification of emissions for a project in Oregon did not necessarily mean BLM could quantify similar emissions from this project. The case was argued before the High Court on January 22, 2019. On September 19, 2019, the Courtruled for the government. In re Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance , No.
In 1989, the Supreme Courtruled that a minority set-aside program in Virginia was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The government cited historical barriers for minority enterprises, but the court balked.
It held that a Black person whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as enslaved persons was not entitled to any protection from the federal courts because he was not a U.S. Four decades later, the Supreme Courtruled that the 14th Amendment guarantees U.S. citizenship to anyone born in the United States.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
The court, which did not address the plaintiffs’ arguments regarding alleged inadequacies in the climate change-related analyses, found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that they would suffer irreparable harm. Ministry of Economic Affairs (Taipei Administrative Court).
An Oregon womans nude photos ended up the topic of conversation in her small town after a prosecutor looked through her sensitive cellphone data and told the county sheriff what he found despite no warrant, no consent and no suspicion that she had committed a crime. [Sad Heres more of the story, via Oregon Lives reporting.
In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that young people and other plaintiffs asserting a claim against the federal government for infringement of a Fifth Amendment due process right to a “ climate system capable of sustaining human life” did not have Article III standing.
The justices asked the Biden administration for more information in a trio of cases that the court granted in February. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and Oregon v. In 1989, the courtruled that an inmate seeking post-conviction relief is not “in custody” for a conviction once the sentence for that conviction has expired.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The most recent biological opinion (BiOp) and related record of decision (ROD) were issued in September 2020 after district courts invalidated six earlier biological opinions.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content