Remove Court Rules Remove Oregon Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Twelve cases added to Supreme Court calendar

SCOTUSBlog

On Friday, the justices agreed to decide whether the Nollan / Dolan test applies to a California man’s challenge to a development fee, or whether – as a California appeals court ruled – the fee is instead immune from such review because it was authorized by legislation. A federal appeals court ruled that Fikre’s case was not moot.

article thumbnail

Outspoken critic on Texas city council seeks to revive lawsuit over retaliatory arrest

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Four years ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Nieves v. City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. In Gonzalez v.

Statute 74
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Holds Berkeley’s Gas Ban Preempted by U.S. Energy Policy & Conservation Act

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in California Restaurant Association v. The court overturned a District Court ruling to invalidate a Berkeley, California, prohibition on natural gas infrastructure in newly-constructed buildings. O n Monday, April 17, 2023, the U.S. City of Berkeley.

article thumbnail

Earning Freedom: A Tale of Redemption Behind Bars

The Crime Report

Then, in 2009 , the California Supreme Court ruled that the callousness of the original crime couldn’t be a parole board’s sole criterion for denying a person freedom. There’s no rationale between what he did then and his current dangerousness, that’s why we have the youth offender statute,” Shaddow said. “We

Attorney 116
article thumbnail

How Do Lawyers Plan for Retirement?

MyCase

The article also states, “It is critically important to understand the labyrinth of potentially applicable ethics rules that intertwine with certain court rules on retirement.”. According to Law.com , attorney retirement in New York is “remarkably complex” with “variations of ‘retire’… used in different contexts.”

Lawyer 52
article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The appellate court also found that even if the trial court erred, the error was harmless because the State proved both acts beyond a reasonable doubt. Hawaii Court Ruled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review. Environmental Groups Challenged Authorization for New Natural Gas Plant in Oregon.

Court 59
article thumbnail

Timber industry, federal government battle over preservation of southern Oregon forest

SCOTUSBlog

This week,we highlight petitions that ask the court to consider, among other things, whether Barack Obama had the authority as president to expand a national monument in the forests of Oregon into land overseen by the Interior Department. The Oregon district court rejected the timber company’s challenge. But the D.C.