JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 10, 2022

The court ruled for Google: “I conclude that it does not require the imposition of a duty. The family is obviously grieving and North Carolina generally allows three years for the filing of a personal injury action under the statute of limitations.

Tort 36

Tort Personal Injury Legal Legal 36

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 25, 2021

The case is brought under statutes like 18 U.S.C. 2255, “Civil Remedy for Personal Injuries,” which provides that any person who is a victim of a violation of child pornography may recover the actual damages or liquidated damages in the amount of $150,000 per victim, and reasonable attorney’s fees. In 2002, the U.S.

Personal Injury 58

Personal Injury Tort Court Rules Statute 58

Day on Torts

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

This ruling was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff argued in this appeal that despite failing to meet this 90-day time limitation, her filing with the Claims Commission was not time-barred because it fell within the one-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims found in Tenn. Code Ann. §

Statute 52

Statute Personal Injury Court Construction 52

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 30, 2023

Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personal injury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. ” __ Another case in the court is a cautionary tale about those creating their own haunted houses. See Pennsylvania General Assembly Statute §7102. Johnson & Johnson Perper v.

Tort 59

Tort Litigation Litigating Construction 59

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 31, 2023

The court ruled against her and found that the park’s duty was only to “make conditions as safe as they appear to be” and that Munoz “ was aware of the risk she encountered, and expected to be surprised, startled, and scared.” She sued for negligence of the park in maintaining a safe environment and the training of staff.

Tort 58

Tort Lawyer Lawyers Personal Injury Lawyer 58

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Supreme Court held that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that its review of the remand order in Baltimore’s climate change case against fossil fuel companies was limited to determining whether the defendants properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute.

Court 45

Court Statute Government Litigation 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The court further found that EPCA’s legislative history did not support the plaintiff’s “expansive interpretation.”

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 10, 2025

An association of private, for-profit colleges in Texas went to federal court to challenge that regulation. Last April, the 5th Circuit agreed with the challengers and invalidated the rule. Oklahoma v. Gauthier v.

Education 88

Education Contract Government Court 88