This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Balancing “the interests of homeowners in default against those seeking affordable home loans,” the Supreme Court in Sheen v. ” The court settles a conflict in Court of Appeal case law and notes a similar divide in federal district courtrulings.
5th 93 — “ Missed break premiums count as wages, State Supreme Courtrules.” 5th 905 — “ Lenders don’t owe borrowers a general duty of care, top state courtrules.” Related: Supreme Court immigration decision recognized as one of the “Top Verdicts of 2022” 2022) 13 Cal.5th
All of the work that a litigation paralegal does is usually tied to a deadline set by the courtrules or the judge. Free Guide for PersonalInjury Paralegals Are you ready to be a rockstar personalinjury paralegal?! As part of this, time management is important.
The only issue in this personalinjury case was damages. Plaintiff and his experts also testified that plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury in the accident. The Courtruled that this was sufficient material evidence from which the jury could find a permanent injury in this case.
A tragedy in North Carolina could present rather difficult torts questions in a wrongful death case for a grieving family. The courtruled for Google: “I conclude that it does not require the imposition of a duty. She was seriously injured after being struck by an automobile that was negligently driven by Harwood.
Supreme Court has held that issuing foreign government bonds is a commercial activity, even if done for a sovereign purpose. It is unclear if Chinese courts applying the FSIL will reach the same conclusion. to Article 14(3) is significant because Chinese court decisions that recognize foreign judgments are considered “rulings.”
Share The Supreme Court on Thursday put a bankruptcy plan for Purdue Pharma, the manufacturer of the highly addictive opioid painkiller OxyContin, on hold while it reviews a challenge to the legality of the plan, which would shield the Sackler family, the owners of the drug company, from lawsuits. There were no recorded dissents.
2255, “Civil Remedy for PersonalInjuries,” which provides that any person who is a victim of a violation of child pornography may recover the actual damages or liquidated damages in the amount of $150,000 per victim, and reasonable attorney’s fees. The case is brought under statutes like 18 U.S.C. In 2002, the U.S.
Here is my annual list of Halloween torts and crimes. Halloween of course remains a holiday seemingly designed for personalinjury lawyers around the world and this year’s additions show why. Halloween has everything for a torts-filled holiday: battery, trespass, defamation, nuisance, product liability and more.
The result is a wicked brew of negligence, product defects, intentional torts, and every other tort and crime known above the netherworld. So without further ado, here are this year’s spookiest of torts. Both Kelly and Rando sued for torts ranging from assault to intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The court denied, however, Connecticut’s motion for costs and fees, noting that several issues raised by Exxon were novel in the Second Circuit and that many relevant portions of district courtrulings in other circuits had not been subject to appellate review until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Baltimore case.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content