Conflict of Laws
OCTOBER 16, 2021
Written by Marco Farina, Italian lawyer, PhD in Civil Procedural Law at the University La Sapienza of Rome – Adjunct Professor of Civil Procedural Law at the University LUISS of Rome.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 24, 2025
Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether the courts ruling would have any practical effect in the FDAs e-cigarette disputes, in light of the governments concession that litigating in the 5th Circuit does not create logistical problems. Almost all of the cases are being filed in the Fifth Circuit, he emphasized.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
DECEMBER 12, 2023
The mere admissibility of the lawsuit is a victory in itself, given that German environmental law – at least in its express wording – does not give environmental associations the right to sue for the implementation of immediate action programs under the CCA. On the merits as well, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
Conflict of Laws
DECEMBER 12, 2020
The Jurisdiction of the Chinese Court: Prorogated Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the first issue that the Court had to consider when it dealt with the dispute. However, the Court ruled that its jurisdiction over the case was established pursuant to the prorogated jurisdiction under the CPL regime. Concluding Remarks.
Conflict of Laws
MARCH 16, 2025
The court held that, under the disputed clause, only when the option holder chooses to take the proceedings in the designated court will that court have exclusive jurisdiction, but this does not exclude the right of the option holder to sue in other competent courts. [9] 18] In Picc Xiamen Branch v.
Conflict of Laws
AUGUST 5, 2024
On 18 June 2024, the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area Nanning International Commercial Tribunal under the Nanning Railway Transportation Intermediate Court, Guangxi (hereafter the “Nanning Court”), ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment.
Conflict of Laws
FEBRUARY 2, 2022
First and second instance courts decided in favour of Z. the Supreme Court ruled that the Athens Court of Appeal failed to examine two grounds of appeal raised by M. The case was sent back to the appellate court [Supreme Court nr. As a next step, Z. Upon second appeal (cassation) of M., 635/20.5.2021].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content