This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. Shchukin A.I.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. 103-113.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. 103-113.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. Shchukin A.I.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. 103-113.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. 103-113.
The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Martiny, Dieter. Baden-Baden 2021, pp 127-146. Codifying Comity: The Case for U.S. 108-138. “The Xu, Guojian. 103-113.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
Martiny, Dieter “The Recognition and Enforcement of Court Decisions Between the EU and Third States”, in Alexander Trunk, Nikitas Hatzimihail (eds.), EU Civil ProcedureLaw and Third Countries – Which Way Forward?, Lignes de force, état des lieux et perspectives pour la Belgique », Journal des Tribunaux (JT) 2022-12, pp.
The FDP, on the other hand, is pursuing an increasingly aggressive strategy, rejecting numerous climate measures by referring to emerging “future technologies,” and “freedoms” (such as the freedom to drive without speed limits). On the merits as well, the courtruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
Sonner sought restitution for a past harm but failed to demonstrate that she lacked an adequate remedy at law. The issue was whether federal courts can award equitable relief when state law permits it, but an adequate legal remedy exists. Decision The courtruled in favor of Bachmann, granting her qualified immunity.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content