This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In an 8-1 decision, the US Supreme Court Thursday ruled that Congress does not have to provide Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits to residents of PuertoRico. The decision impacts the residents of PuertoRico and other US territories who are applying for government benefits. In United States v.
“Supreme CourtRules on Stolen Art, Signs and PuertoRico’s Status; The justices addressed federal benefits in PuertoRico, an effort to reclaim an Impressionist masterpiece and whether the First Amendment allows some billboard regulations”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Friday’s edition of The New York Times.
After Ramos , criminal defendant asks justices to preserve non-unanimous acquittals in PuertoRico. Louisiana , the Supreme Courtruled that states could only convict defendants of serious offenses with a unanimous jury verdict. The PuertoRico Supreme Court, however, disagreed, ruling that Ramos applied to both.
They argued that the common law definition of birthright citizenship includes any territory under a country’s dominion, and American Samoans should receive the same citizenship granted to people born in other US territories like PuertoRico.
NYT ]. * SCOTUS rules denying PuertoRico's residents Supplemental Security Income is no biggie. wants to overturn an Iowa Supreme Courtruling that bans cops from searching people's trash without a warrant. Some think so. [ Show me the money! Lawmakers hope new regulations can combat hiding assets in the states.
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme CourtRules on Stolen Art, Signs and PuertoRico’s Status (Adam Liptak, The New York Times). Supreme Court considers whether high school football coach has right to pray on the field (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal).
Bidwell , which excluded PuertoRico from Article I tax law, refers to “an uncivilized race” and the danger of “incorporat[ing] an alien and hostile people into the United States.”. People born in the other territories — Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, PuertoRico, and the U.S. territories. Then in Dred Scott v.
A lower Washington state court found that the strike was protected by the NLRA, which would mean the issue is properly heard before the National Labor Relations Board. The Teamsters are asking that the court affirm this lower courtruling, while Glacier seeks to enforce state tort law.
Share Thursday’s decision in Financial Oversight & Management Board for PuertoRico v. Ignoring the threshold questions on which the court had not granted review and applying a longstanding clear-statement rule, a near-unanimous courtruled in favor of PuertoRico’s financial oversight board.
Under a series of cases the Supreme Court decided over 100 ago, known as the Insular Cases, people born in unincorporated U.S. People born in the other territories — Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, PuertoRico, and the U.S. citizenship. Virgin Islands — do have birthright citizenship by act of Congress.)
Share An intriguingly divided courtruled Monday in Denezpi v. United States , upholding the federal court conviction of a defendant previously prosecuted and sentenced by a Court of Indian Offenses for charges stemming from the same incident. Wheeler and, more recently, PuertoRico v.
Share Residents of PuertoRico and other U.S. territories do not have a constitutional right to receive certain federal benefits that the government provides to people who live in the 50 states, the Supreme Courtruled on Thursday in an 8-1 decision. The case, United States v. Jose Luis Vaello-Madero, a U.S.
The US Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a group of PuertoRico journalists who were seeking documents from the island’s financial oversight board, saying that the board is protected from such information requests by sovereign immunity. The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for PuertoRico v.
and PuertoRico. Ltd have since been battling over the rights in the Fiorucci name with the Italian Supreme Courtruling in October 2016 that the designer’s estate may not use his name. Payless filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in St. Paul Jones said in a statement. Ltd, for roughly $41 million in 1990.
In an earlier blogpost we reported that the Amsterdam District Courtruled that it had international jurisdiction under the Brussels I-bis Regulation and the GDPR. The settlement addressed issues very similar to those raised in this case, as explicitly outlined in the agreement.
In 2014, the Supreme Courtruled in Harris v. After the court’s decision in Harris , the challengers in this case – home health care workers and a non-profit group – began a campaign to notify other workers of the ruling and to try to unseat one of the unions representing the workers. territories.
In that case, Ann Hopkins was denied a promotion because she was perceived as “pushy” and “too macho,” and the Supreme Courtruled in 1989 that the company’s actions violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. It was the first time the court recognized that gender stereotyping qualifies as unlawful sex discrimination.
Share Jose Luis Vaello-Madero is an American citizen who was born in PuertoRico. But when he moved back to PuertoRico to be closer to his family, Vaello-Madero lost his SSI benefits because, by law, PuertoRico residents are excluded from the program. Two lower courtsruled in favor of Vaello-Madero.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content