This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A federal appeals courtruled Tuesday that RhodeIsland students can’t proceed with their lawsuit contending that the state failed to provide an adequate civics…
In 1984, the Supreme Courtruled in Chevron U.S.A. We should acknowledge forthrightly that Chevron did not undo, and could not have undone, the judicial duty to provide an independent judgment of the law’s meaning in the cases that come before the Nation’s courts.” The cases are Loper Bright Enterprises v.
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear an appeal to expand gun rights in the United States in a New York case over the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense, marking the court’s first foray into gun rights since Justice Amy Coney Barrett came on board in October, making a 6-3 conservative majority, reports the Chicago Tribune.
Federal: Federal CourtRules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. Yellen that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) exceeds Congress’s constitutional power. To read more on Senate Bill 8059, please go here.
The court relisted Escobar back in June 2024 and has been holding it ever since, pending the resolution of Glossip. The Supreme Courtruled in favor of Richard Glossip in late February , holding that the prosecution there violated its constitutional obligation under Napue to correct false testimony. Relisted after the Dec.
Recently, a federal court denied two back-to-back motions by a group called Green Oceans to preliminarily enjoin construction of the 704-megawatt Revolution Wind project off the coast of RhodeIsland.
Alex and Ani filed a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on June 9, citing assets and liabilities that both range from $100 million to $500 million. NOW: Fiorucci was rescued by the Tacchella brothers of Italian jeans company Carrera S.p.A.,
Neillys petition for review will presumably be put on hold until the justices rule sometime next year on Ellingburgs case. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit allowing the state to enforce most of the law was only a preliminary one and may change as the litigation continues.
Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. RhodeIsland v. West Virginia v. 19-1818 (1st Cir.).
RhodeIsland Federal Court Denied Motion to Stay Remand Order in RhodeIsland’s Climate Change Case. RhodeIsland v. Colorado Federal Court Remanded Local Governments’ Climate Case to State Court. The case was argued before the High Court on January 22, 2019. BP p.l.c. ,
University of RhodeIsland professor Erik Loomis defended the murder of a conservative protester and said he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. It has lost major courtrulings due to its unconstitutional treatment of conservative speakers.
Ohio , the Supreme Courtruled in 1969 that even calling for violence is protected under the First Amendment unless there is a threat of “ imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”. That is legitimately concerning and chilling language. In Brandenburg v.
Nevertheless, in the past, I have defended extremist views on academic freedom grounds like those of University of RhodeIsland professor Erik Loomis, who rationalized the murder of a conservative protester and said that he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. Other academics have called for or defended violent acts.
RhodeIsland v. Montana and Wyoming Asked Supreme Court to Consider Claims That Washington Impermissibly Blocked Access for Coal Shipments. Swiss CourtRuled that Imminent Danger of Climate Crisis Justified Protesters’ Actions. .); Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County v. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.)
They contended that it would seem to follow from Apprendi that a jury must find any facts necessary to support a (nonzero) restitution order, and they suggested that the court should take up a lower courtruling to the contrary. Relisted after the Jan. 10 conference.) Ocean State Tactical, LLC v.
The federal district court for the Eastern District of California held that more analysis of the impacts climate change would have on a water transfer program for the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta was required under NEPA. In a letter to the court on March 2, the parties asked the court to defer further briefing on the U.S.-based
RhodeIsland , No. Connecticut Federal Court Granted State’s Motion to Remand Unfair Trade Practices Lawsuit Against Exxon. Among the arguments rejected by the court were claims that the Forest Service’s consideration of the project’s greenhouse gas effects in the final environmental impact statement (EIS) was deficient.
It also once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review, including a challenge to Marylands ban on military-style assault weapons and a challenge to RhodeIslands ban on large-capacity magazines. Alito would reverse the lower courtsruling without additional briefing or oral arguments.
Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. RhodeIsland v. Shell Oil Products Co. , 19-1818 (1st Cir.).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 99,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content